Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin.
Department of Psychology, University of Kassel.
Personal Disord. 2023 May;14(3):287-299. doi: 10.1037/per0000576. Epub 2022 May 5.
According to the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) of the a moderate or greater impairment in personality functioning is the essential criterion for a personality disorder diagnosis. Personality functioning is operationalized in the Level of Personality Functioning Scale via 4 domains (identity, self-direction, empathy, and intimacy) and 2 higher order dimensions (self and interpersonal functioning). The current study examined the reliability (interrater, test-retest), structure, and validity (convergent, discriminant, and incremental) of the Structured Clinical Interview for the AMPD-Module I (SCID-5-AMPD-I). A clinical sample ( = 121) completed the SCID-5-AMPD-I, along with an interview for - Section II personality disorders and self-reports for personality pathology (personality functioning, personality organization, personality structure, and pathological personality traits) and other forms of psychopathology (depression, anxiety, somatization, and general disability). Interrater and test-retest reliability was excellent for overall personality functioning, the higher order dimensions, and the domains, except for the empathy domain in the test-retest condition. Factor analyses suggest that personality functioning is an essentially unidimensional construct. Personality functioning demonstrated high convergence with other forms of personality pathology and showed good discriminant validity in relation to depression, anxiety, and somatization but not in relation to the broader construct of general disability. Personality functioning (Criterion A) showed incremental validity over pathological personality traits (Criterion B) in predicting interview-assessed DSM-5 Section II personality disorders but not in predicting self-reported personality and general psychopathology. The present study suggests that the SCID-5-AMPD-I is a viable measure for personality functioning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
根据人格障碍的替代模型(AMPD),人格功能的中度或更大损害是人格障碍诊断的基本标准。人格功能在人格功能水平量表中通过 4 个领域(身份、自我导向、同理心和亲密关系)和 2 个高阶维度(自我和人际关系功能)来操作化。本研究考察了 AMPD 模块 I(SCID-5-AMPD-I)的结构临床访谈的可靠性(评估者间、测试-重测)、结构和有效性(收敛、区别和增量)。一个临床样本(n=121)完成了 SCID-5-AMPD-I,以及人格障碍的访谈-第二部分和人格病理学的自我报告(人格功能、人格组织、人格结构和病理性人格特质)和其他形式的精神病理学(抑郁、焦虑、躯体化和一般残疾)。评估者间和测试-重测的可靠性在总体人格功能、高阶维度和领域方面都非常好,除了测试-重测条件下的同理心领域。因素分析表明,人格功能是一个基本的单维结构。人格功能与其他形式的人格病理学有很高的收敛性,与抑郁、焦虑和躯体化有很好的区别有效性,但与更广泛的一般残疾结构没有区别。人格功能(标准 A)在预测 DSM-5 第二部分人格障碍的访谈评估方面比病理性人格特质(标准 B)具有增量有效性,但在预测自我报告的人格和一般心理病理学方面没有。本研究表明,SCID-5-AMPD-I 是一种可行的人格功能测量工具。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。