From School of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
J Pers Disord. 2020 Dec;34(Suppl C):95-123. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2020_34_511.
To evaluate the reliability and convergent validity of the Structured Clinical Interview for Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (SCID-5-AMPD) Module I and Module II, 88 adult psychotherapy participants were administered the Italian translations of the SCID-5-AMPD Module I and Module II, Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form (LPFS-BF), Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report (LPFS-SF), Personality Inventory for (PID-5), Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+), and Structured Clinical Interview for Personality Disorders (SCID-5-PD) relying on a Williams crossover design. SCID-5-AMPD Module I and Module II showed excellent inter-rater reliability. In terms of convergent validity, meaningful associations were observed between SCID-5-AMPD Module I scores and self-report measures of Criterion A; similarly, SCID-5-AMPD Module II trait scores were meaningfully related to PID-5 trait scores. As a whole, our preliminary findings supported the clinical utility of 5 AMPD.
为了评估《替代人格障碍模型的结构临床访谈》（SCID-5-AMPD）模块 I 和模块 II 的可靠性和收敛效度，88 名成人心理治疗参与者接受了 SCID-5-AMPD 模块 I 和模块 II、人格功能水平量表-简短形式（LPFS-BF）、人格功能水平量表-自我报告（LPFS-SF）、人格检查表-5（PID-5）、人格诊断问卷-4+（PDQ-4+）和《人格障碍的结构临床访谈》（SCID-5-PD）的意大利语翻译，采用 Williams 交叉设计。SCID-5-AMPD 模块 I 和模块 II 显示出极好的评分者间信度。在收敛效度方面，SCID-5-AMPD 模块 I 评分与 A 标准的自我报告测量之间存在有意义的关联；同样，SCID-5-AMPD 模块 II 特质评分与 PID-5 特质评分也有意义相关。总的来说，我们的初步发现支持了 5 AMPD 的临床效用。
