• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血浆乳酸脱氢酶浓度升高与血清相比。

Elevated Lactate Dehydrogenase Concentrations in Plasma Compared to Serum.

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.

Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Lab Med. 2022 Sep 1;53(5):479-482. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmac026.

DOI:10.1093/labmed/lmac026
PMID:35512404
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the difference in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) concentrations in plasma vs serum specimens in our patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We measured LDH in 110 paired plasma and serum specimens over a 2-week period. Hemolytic indices were performed on each specimen. These paired specimens were drawn in a single setting and stored under the same conditions. For the last 14 paired specimens, cell counts were performed on the plasma/serum.

RESULTS

Plasma LDH was on average 22% higher than serum LDH. There was no difference in the hemolytic indices between the plasma and the serum specimens. In the last 14 specimens, cell counts revealed increased platelets in the plasma specimens compared to the serum specimens.

CONCLUSION

We propose switching back to using serum for LDH testing because there was unpredictable elevation in plasma LDH concentrations. These elevations in LDH levels may be linked to the platelets present in plasma and that may lyse or become activated with storage at refrigerated temperature.

摘要

目的

评估本患者人群中血浆与血清标本中乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)浓度的差异。

材料与方法

我们在两周内测量了 110 对血浆和血清标本中的 LDH。对每个标本进行溶血指数检测。这些配对标本均在同一时间采集,并在相同条件下储存。对于最后 14 对配对标本,对血浆/血清进行细胞计数。

结果

血浆 LDH 平均比血清 LDH 高 22%。血浆和血清标本之间的溶血指数无差异。在最后 14 个标本中,细胞计数显示血浆标本中的血小板数量高于血清标本。

结论

我们建议改用血清进行 LDH 检测,因为血浆 LDH 浓度不可预测地升高。LDH 水平的这些升高可能与存在于血浆中的血小板有关,这些血小板可能在冷藏温度下储存时发生裂解或被激活。

相似文献

1
Elevated Lactate Dehydrogenase Concentrations in Plasma Compared to Serum.血浆乳酸脱氢酶浓度升高与血清相比。
Lab Med. 2022 Sep 1;53(5):479-482. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmac026.
2
Falsely Increased Plasma Lactate Dehydrogenase without Hemolysis Following Transport through Pneumatic Tube System.经气动管道系统传输后无溶血情况下血浆乳酸脱氢酶假性升高
J Appl Lab Med. 2019 Nov;4(3):433-438. doi: 10.1373/jalm.2018.028928. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
3
Serum lactate and lactate dehydrogenase as parameters for the prediction of dengue severity.血清乳酸和乳酸脱氢酶作为预测登革热严重程度的参数。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Jun;97 Suppl 6:S220-31.
4
Comparison of serum and plasma lactate dehydrogenase in postburn patients.
Burns. 2000 Feb;26(1):46-8. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(99)00093-5.
5
Can elevated lactate and LDH produce a false positive enzymatic ethanol result in live patients presenting to the emergency department?在急诊就诊的患者中,升高的乳酸和 LDH 是否会导致酶法乙醇检测出现假阳性结果?
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2018 Mar;56(3):189-192. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2017.1357825. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
6
[Comparative studies on lactate dehydrogenase in serum and plasma of rats (author's transl)].
Jikken Dobutsu. 1978 Apr;27(2):167-75. doi: 10.1538/expanim1978.27.2_167.
7
A new assay falsely increases lactate dehydrogenase in plasma but not in serum.一种新的检测方法会使血浆中的乳酸脱氢酶假性升高,但血清中不会。
Clin Biochem. 2024 Oct;131-132:110804. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2024.110804. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
8
[Elevation of serum lactate dehydrogenase. Diagnostic, prognostic and evolutive values].[血清乳酸脱氢酶升高。诊断、预后及演变价值]
Presse Med. 2002 Jan 26;31(3):107-12.
9
Interference of the measurement of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity in human serum and plasma by LDH from blood cells.
Clin Chim Acta. 1979 Dec 3;99(2):135-42. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(79)90036-6.
10
Lactate dehydrogenase isoenzymes in patients with essential thrombocythemia.
Thromb Res. 1993 Apr 15;70(2):111-6. doi: 10.1016/0049-3848(93)90151-d.