Suppr超能文献

一种新的检测方法会使血浆中的乳酸脱氢酶假性升高,但血清中不会。

A new assay falsely increases lactate dehydrogenase in plasma but not in serum.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Slagelse-Næstved-Nykøbing F. Hospital, Ringstedgade 61, 4700 Næstved, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Holbæk Hospital, Smedelundsgade 60, 4300 Holbæk, Denmark.

出版信息

Clin Biochem. 2024 Oct;131-132:110804. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2024.110804. Epub 2024 Jul 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Serum is the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC)-recommended matrix for the measurement of lactate dehydrogenase (LD); however, many laboratories opt for lithium heparin plasma to achieve quicker turnaround times and minimize tube usage. When introducing the new Sigma-Strong IFCC-recommended LDH2 assay from Abbott Laboratories on lithium-heparin collected samples, we observed a rise in the patient median LD activity as well as several samples exhibiting falsely elevated values.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

120 + serum and plasma samples from consenting patients were collected and evaluated for complete blood count and lactate dehydrogenase using two different assays. Aggregated patient results before and after introduction of the LDH2 assay were compared.

RESULTS

Mean LD was 14% higher in plasma than in serum when using the LDH2 assay but only 5% higher when using the previous LDH legacy assay from Abbott Laboratories. Similarly, platelets and leukocytes were 10-30 times higher in plasma than in serum. Aggregated lactate dehydrogenase patient results demonstrated a dramatic increase in patient median following introduction of the LDH2 assay. Various experiments were tried to reduce cellular interference, but the only viable solution we found, apart from reverting to the LDH legacy assay, was to utilize serum tubes.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that lithium-heparin plasma leads to falsely elevated lactate dehydrogenase activity when using the LDH2 assay. These errors can be prevented by using serum collected in gel separator tubes.

摘要

简介

血清是国际临床化学联合会(IFCC)推荐用于测量乳酸脱氢酶(LD)的基质;然而,许多实验室选择使用肝素锂血浆来实现更快的周转时间并尽量减少管的使用。当引入雅培实验室的新 Sigma-Strong IFCC 推荐的 LDH2 检测方法用于肝素锂采集的样本时,我们观察到患者的中位 LD 活性升高,并且有几个样本显示出假性升高值。

材料和方法

收集了 120 例以上同意的患者的血清和血浆样本,并使用两种不同的检测方法对全血细胞计数和乳酸脱氢酶进行了评估。比较了引入 LDH2 检测方法前后的汇总患者结果。

结果

使用 LDH2 检测方法时,血浆中的 LD 比血清中的高 14%,而使用雅培实验室以前的 LDH 传统检测方法时,LD 只高 5%。同样,血小板和白细胞在血浆中的含量比血清中的高 10-30 倍。汇总的乳酸脱氢酶患者结果显示,引入 LDH2 检测方法后,患者中位数明显升高。我们尝试了各种实验来减少细胞干扰,但除了恢复使用 LDH 传统检测方法外,我们发现的唯一可行解决方案是使用血清管。

结论

我们得出结论,当使用 LDH2 检测方法时,肝素锂血浆会导致乳酸脱氢酶活性假性升高。可以通过使用凝胶分离管采集的血清来预防这些错误。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验