• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CTA 在疑似主动脉夹层的 ED 患者评估中的差异。

Variation in CTA evaluation of ED patients suspected of aortic dissection.

机构信息

John A. Burns School of Medicine, 651 Ilalo St, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.

Punahou School, 1601 Punahou St, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA.

出版信息

Emerg Radiol. 2022 Aug;29(4):709-713. doi: 10.1007/s10140-022-02054-0. Epub 2022 May 5.

DOI:10.1007/s10140-022-02054-0
PMID:35513545
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was performed to investigate the variation in CTA imaging for AoD in an ED to determine if limiting the scanned region to the chest can effectively rule-out AoD without delaying care.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients belonging to a geographically isolated health maintenance organization who underwent CTA evaluation for possible acute AoD in the emergency department between 2016 and 2020. We evaluated for the regions included in the CTA, the presence of an acute AoD, and clinical outcomes. For those who were ruled-out of an AoD with a CTA limited to the chest, we investigated clinical follow-up up to 6 months after their initial presentation.

RESULTS

Over the study period, there were 1143 CT scans ordered by ED physicians to evaluate for AoD in patients without a history of AoD. Only 23.0% of screening studies were of the chest only. There were 29 acute AoDs diagnosed (14 type A and 15 type B) making for a prevalence of 2.5%. Only one patient with an acute AoD detected on a chest-only CTA required farther imaging, which did not delay clinical care. No patients ruled-out for acute AoD with a chest-only CTA had a return ED visit or repeat CTA within 6 months diagnosing a missed AoD. There were no AoDs limited to the abdominal aorta that would have been missed on a chest-only study.

CONCLUSION

In patients in the ED with suspected new acute AoD, a CTA limited to the chest can effectively evaluate the condition without delaying care in this integrated healthcare system with 24/7 CT availability.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨急诊科急性主动脉夹层(AoD)患者 CTA 成像的变化,以确定仅扫描胸部是否可以有效地排除 AoD 而不延迟治疗。

方法

对 2016 年至 2020 年间在急诊科因疑似急性 AoD 接受 CTA 评估的、来自地理位置孤立的健康维护组织的所有患者进行回顾性图表审查。我们评估了 CTA 包括的区域、急性 AoD 的存在以及临床结局。对于那些 CTA 仅局限于胸部而排除 AoD 的患者,我们调查了他们在初次就诊后 6 个月的临床随访情况。

结果

在研究期间,急诊科医生为评估无 AoD 病史的患者进行了 1143 次 CT 扫描以排除 AoD。仅有 23.0%的筛选研究仅为胸部 CT。共诊断出 29 例急性 AoD(14 型 A 和 15 型 B),患病率为 2.5%。仅 1 例急性 AoD 患者在胸部 CT 上检测到 AoD 需要进一步影像学检查,但并未延迟临床治疗。在胸部 CT 排除急性 AoD 的患者中,无 6 个月内返回急诊科就诊或重复 CTA 诊断漏诊 AoD。在仅进行胸部 CT 检查的情况下,不会漏诊局限于腹主动脉的 AoD。

结论

在急诊科疑似新发急性 AoD 的患者中,在 24/7 具备 CT 检查的综合性医疗体系中,仅行胸部 CTA 即可有效地评估病情而不延迟治疗。

相似文献

1
Variation in CTA evaluation of ED patients suspected of aortic dissection.CTA 在疑似主动脉夹层的 ED 患者评估中的差异。
Emerg Radiol. 2022 Aug;29(4):709-713. doi: 10.1007/s10140-022-02054-0. Epub 2022 May 5.
2
MR angiography can guide ED management of suspected acute aortic dissection.磁共振血管造影可指导对疑似急性主动脉夹层的急诊处理。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;35(4):527-530. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.11.039. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
3
Implementation of an aortic dissection CT protocol with clinical decision support aimed at decreasing radiation exposure by reducing routine abdominopelvic imaging.实施主动脉夹层 CT 协议,并结合临床决策支持,旨在通过减少常规的腹盆成像来降低辐射暴露。
Clin Imaging. 2020 Nov;67:108-112. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
4
In-Hospital Cost Comparison of Triple-Rule-Out Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Acute Chest Pain.三联征计算机断层血管摄影术与急性胸痛患者标准治疗方案的住院费用比较。
J Thorac Imaging. 2020 May;35(3):198-203. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000474.
5
CT of suspected thoracic acute aortic injury in the emergency department: is routine abdominopelvic imaging worth the additional collective radiation dose?急诊科疑似胸部急性主动脉损伤的CT检查:常规腹盆腔成像增加的集体辐射剂量是否值得?
Emerg Radiol. 2017 Feb;24(1):13-20. doi: 10.1007/s10140-016-1435-9. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
6
Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Stress Echocardiography in Acute Chest Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.冠状动脉 CT 血管造影与应激超声心动图在急性胸痛中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Sep;11(9):1288-1297. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.03.024. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
7
Safety and efficiency of outpatient versus emergency department-based coronary CT angiography for evaluation of patients with potential ischemic chest pain.门诊与急诊科基于冠状动脉 CT 血管造影评估疑似缺血性胸痛患者的安全性和效率。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015 Nov-Dec;9(6):534-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
8
Non-gated high-pitch computed tomography aortic angiography: Myocardial perfusion defects in patients with suspected aortic dissection.非门控高分辨率计算机断层扫描主动脉血管造影:疑似主动脉夹层患者的心肌灌注缺损
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 May-Jun;11(3):208-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
9
The characteristics of acute aortic dissection among young Chinese patients: a comparison between Marfan syndrome and non-Marfan syndrome patients.中国年轻患者急性主动脉夹层的特征:马凡综合征与非马凡综合征患者的比较。
Yonsei Med J. 2009 Apr 30;50(2):239-44. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2009.50.2.239.
10
Can multiphase dynamic CT angiography provide a better assessment of aortic dissection compared with the standard triphasic protocol?与标准三相方案相比,多期动态CT血管造影能否更好地评估主动脉夹层?
Acta Radiol. 2018 Jan;59(1):58-64. doi: 10.1177/0284185117704236. Epub 2017 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
A deep learning algorithm for the detection of aortic dissection on non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography via the identification and segmentation of the true and false lumens of the aorta.一种用于在非增强计算机断层扫描上检测主动脉夹层的深度学习算法,通过识别和分割主动脉的真腔和假腔来实现。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Oct 1;14(10):7365-7378. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-533. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
2
Low D-dimer in acute coronary syndrome and heart failure: Screening for large vessel diseases in patients with chest symptoms.急性冠状动脉综合征和心力衰竭中的低D-二聚体:对有胸部症状患者的大血管疾病筛查
Heliyon. 2024 May 14;10(10):e31210. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31210. eCollection 2024 May 30.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Sex differences and temporal trends in aortic dissection: a population-based study of incidence, treatment strategies, and outcome in Swedish patients during 15 years.性别差异与主动脉夹层的时间趋势:15 年间瑞典人群中发病率、治疗策略和预后的基于人群研究。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jul 7;41(26):2430-2438. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa446.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of isolated abdominal aortic dissection.孤立性腹主动脉夹层的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Dec;70(6):2046-2053.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.467. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
3
Variation in emergency department use of computed tomography for investigation of acute aortic dissection.
A Novel Tool for Distinguishing Type A Acute Aortic Syndrome from Heart Failure and Acute Coronary Syndrome.
一种区分A型急性主动脉综合征与心力衰竭和急性冠状动脉综合征的新型工具。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 18;13(22):3472. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13223472.
4
Evaluation of the Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines Risk Prediction Tool for Acute Aortic Syndrome: The RIPP Score.加拿大急性主动脉综合征临床实践指南风险预测工具评估:RIPP评分
Emerg Med Int. 2023 May 25;2023:6636800. doi: 10.1155/2023/6636800. eCollection 2023.
急诊科对急性主动脉夹层进行计算机断层扫描检查的使用差异。
Emerg Radiol. 2018 Jun;25(3):293-298. doi: 10.1007/s10140-018-1587-x. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
4
Preliminary development of a clinical decision rule for acute aortic syndromes.急性主动脉综合征临床决策规则的初步制定。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Nov;31(11):1546-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
5
Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer.与常见计算机断层扫描检查相关的辐射剂量及相关的终生可归因癌症风险。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Dec 14;169(22):2078-86. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.427.