• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立护理实践博士项目伦理审查流程,以提高标准化、效率和及时性。

Establishing the doctor of nursing practice project ethical review process to improve standardization, efficiency, and timeliness.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD.

Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Nurs Outlook. 2022 Jul-Aug;70(4):616-624. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 May 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.outlook.2022.03.002
PMID:35513900
Abstract

BACKGROUND

DNP Scholarly projects require review for scientific merit and human subject protection. Rapid growth of DNP programs and projects has increased Institutional Review Board (IRB) burden and increased the length of project approval time when most DNP scholarly projects are quality improvement (QI) projects and not deemed Human Subjects Research (HSR).

PURPOSE

Develop a process and describe the rationale for creating and implementing a Project Ethical Review Committee (PERC) in the School of Nursing and to evaluate the experience of the first cohort of submissions.

PROCESS

Committee was formed using expert consensus approach, in collaboration with IRB. Standards of Procedures and training materials created.

OUTCOME MEASURE

100 projects submitted to committee; 95 deemed QI (95%) and 5 projects considered HSR (5%). First 94 projects were reviewed, and approval letters sent within 8 weeks.

DISCUSSION

This paper discusses how PERC ensures rigorous and ethical review process for standardization, timeliness, and efficiency.

摘要

背景

DNP 学术项目需要进行科学价值和人类受试者保护的审查。DNP 项目和计划的快速增长增加了机构审查委员会(IRB)的负担,并且当大多数 DNP 学术项目是质量改进(QI)项目而不被视为人类主题研究(HSR)时,项目批准时间延长。

目的

在护理学院开发一个流程,并描述创建和实施项目伦理审查委员会(PERC)的基本原理,并评估第一批提交材料的经验。

过程

委员会是使用专家共识方法与 IRB 合作组建的。制定了程序标准和培训材料。

结果衡量

向委员会提交了 100 个项目;95 个被认为是 QI(95%),5 个被认为是 HSR(5%)。前 94 个项目进行了审查,并在 8 周内发送了批准信。

讨论

本文讨论了 PERC 如何确保标准化、及时性和效率的严格和道德审查过程。

相似文献

1
Establishing the doctor of nursing practice project ethical review process to improve standardization, efficiency, and timeliness.建立护理实践博士项目伦理审查流程,以提高标准化、效率和及时性。
Nurs Outlook. 2022 Jul-Aug;70(4):616-624. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 May 3.
2
Development of an institutional review board preapproval process for Doctor of Nursing Practice students: process and outcome.发展护理实践博士学生机构审查委员会预批准流程:过程和结果。
J Nurs Educ. 2013 Jan;52(1):51-5. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20121212-01. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
3
Academic and Institutional Review Board Collaboration to Ensure Ethical Conduct of Doctor of Nursing Practice Projects.
J Nurs Educ. 2015 Jul;54(7):372-7. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20150617-03.
4
Doctoral graduates' attitudes toward scholarly work and Institutional Review Board and Quality Improvement Committee education and submission processes: A pilot study.博士生对学术工作、机构审查委员会和质量改进委员会教育以及提交过程的态度:一项试点研究。
Nurs Outlook. 2024 Jul-Aug;72(4):102179. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102179. Epub 2024 May 15.
5
Research in nursing education and the institutional review board/ethics committee.护理教育研究与机构审查委员会/伦理委员会
J Prof Nurs. 2021 Mar-Apr;37(2):342-347. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
6
The evolution of a doctor of nursing practice capstone process: programmatic revisions to improve the quality of student projects.护理实践博士顶点项目流程的演变:为提高学生项目质量而进行的方案修订
J Prof Nurs. 2013 Nov-Dec;29(6):370-80. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.05.018. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
7
Academic-Practice Partnerships: Building a sustainable model for Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) projects.学术-实践伙伴关系:为护理实践博士(DNP)项目建立可持续的模式。
J Prof Nurs. 2020 Nov-Dec;36(6):569-578. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
8
DNP scholarly projects: Unintended consequences for academic-practice partnerships.DNP 学术项目:对学术-实践伙伴关系的意外后果。
J Prof Nurs. 2021 May-Jun;37(3):516-520. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
9
An examination of the rigor and value of final scholarly projects completed by DNP nursing students.对护理实践博士(DNP)学生完成的最终学术项目的严谨性和价值的考察。
J Prof Nurs. 2018 Nov-Dec;34(6):437-443. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
10
Navigating the Doctor of Nursing Practice project within an academic practice partnership.在学术实践伙伴关系中驾驭护理实践博士项目。
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2021 May 18;33(12):1125-1130. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000600.