• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于治疗胸段食管癌的调强质子治疗射束配置的比较。

Comparison of intensity modulated proton therapy beam configurations for treating thoracic esophageal cancer.

作者信息

Oonsiri Sornjarod, Kitpanit Sarin, Kannarunimit Danita, Chakkabat Chakkapong, Lertbutsayanukul Chawalit, Prayongrat Anussara

机构信息

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022 Apr 28;22:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.04.005. eCollection 2022 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.phro.2022.04.005
PMID:35514527
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9065423/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Specific proton-beam configurations are needed to spare organs at risk (OARs), including lungs, heart, and spinal cord, when treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the thoracic region. This study aimed to propose new intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) beam configurations and to demonstrate the benefit of IMPT compared with intensity-modulated x-ray therapy (IMXT) for treating ESCC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

IMPT plans with three different beam angle configurations were generated on CT datasets of 25 ESCC patients that were treated with IMXT. The IMPT beam designs were two commonly-used beam configurations (anteroposterior and posterior oblique) and a recently proposed beam configuration (anterosuperior with posteroinferior). The target doses were 50-54 Gy(RBE) and 60-64 Gy(RBE) to the low-risk and high-risk target volumes, respectively. Robust optimization was applied for the IMPT plans. The differences in the dose-volume parameters between the IMXT and IMPT plans were compared.

RESULTS

With target coverage comparable to standard IMXT, IMPT had significantly lower mean doses to the OARs. IMPT with an anteroposterior opposing beam generated the lowest lung dose (mean = 7.1 Gy(RBE), V = 14.1%) and the anterosuperior with posteroinferior beam resulted in the lowest heart dose (mean = 12.8 Gy(RBE), V = 15.7%) and liver dose (mean = 3.9 Gy(RBE), V = 5.9%). For the subgroup of patients with an inferior tumor location (PTVs overlapping a part of the contoured heart), the novel beam demonstrated the optimal OARs sparing.

CONCLUSION

Compared with IMXT, the IMPT plans significantly reduced the radiation dose to the surrounding organs when treating ESCC. IMPT beam configuration selection depends on the tumor location relative to the heart.

摘要

背景与目的

在治疗胸段食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)时,需要特定的质子束配置来保护包括肺、心脏和脊髓在内的危及器官(OARs)。本研究旨在提出新的调强质子治疗(IMPT)束配置,并证明IMPT相较于调强X线治疗(IMXT)在治疗ESCC方面的优势。

材料与方法

在25例接受IMXT治疗的ESCC患者的CT数据集上生成了具有三种不同束角配置的IMPT计划。IMPT束设计为两种常用束配置(前后向和后斜向)以及一种最近提出的束配置(前上向后下)。低危和高危靶区的靶剂量分别为50 - 54 Gy(RBE)和60 - 64 Gy(RBE)。对IMPT计划应用稳健优化。比较了IMXT和IMPT计划之间剂量体积参数的差异。

结果

在靶区覆盖与标准IMXT相当的情况下,IMPT对危及器官的平均剂量显著更低。前后对置束的IMPT产生的肺剂量最低(平均 = 7.1 Gy(RBE),V = 14.1%),前上向后下束导致心脏剂量最低(平均 = 12.8 Gy(RBE),V = 15.7%)和肝脏剂量最低(平均 = 3.9 Gy(RBE),V = 5.9%)。对于肿瘤位于下方(计划靶体积(PTV)与勾勒出的心脏部分重叠)的患者亚组,新束显示出最佳的危及器官 sparing。

结论

与IMXT相比,IMPT计划在治疗ESCC时显著降低了对周围器官的辐射剂量。IMPT束配置的选择取决于肿瘤相对于心脏的位置。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d15b/9065423/e5e4fc5c11aa/fx3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d15b/9065423/5e923123f169/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d15b/9065423/775df33e1d2c/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d15b/9065423/ba74b904e75c/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d15b/9065423/e5e4fc5c11aa/fx3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d15b/9065423/5e923123f169/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d15b/9065423/775df33e1d2c/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d15b/9065423/ba74b904e75c/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d15b/9065423/e5e4fc5c11aa/fx3.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of intensity modulated proton therapy beam configurations for treating thoracic esophageal cancer.用于治疗胸段食管癌的调强质子治疗射束配置的比较。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022 Apr 28;22:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.04.005. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Intensity-modulated proton and carbon-ion radiotherapy using a fixed-beam system for locally advanced lung cancer: dosimetric comparison with x-ray radiotherapy and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) evaluation.使用固定束流系统的调强质子和碳离子放射治疗局部晚期肺癌:与X射线放射治疗的剂量学比较及正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)评估
Phys Med Biol. 2024 Jan 2;69(1). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad13d1.
3
Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in the treatment of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.调强放射治疗与调强质子治疗在复发性鼻咽癌治疗中的剂量学比较
Med Dosim. 2022;47(1):14-19. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2021.07.002. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
4
Potential skin morbidity reduction with intensity-modulated proton therapy for breast cancer with nodal involvement.调强质子治疗乳腺癌伴淋巴结受累可降低皮肤潜在发病率。
Acta Oncol. 2019 Jun;58(6):934-942. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1591638. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
5
Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.网格大小对XiO脑癌治疗计划系统中均匀扫描和调强质子治疗计划的影响。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Sep 8;16(5):447–456. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5510.
6
Dosimetric and radiobiological impact of intensity modulated proton therapy and RapidArc planning for high-risk prostate cancer with seminal vesicles.调强质子治疗和容积旋转调强放疗计划对伴有精囊的高危前列腺癌的剂量学和放射生物学影响
J Med Radiat Sci. 2017 Mar;64(1):18-24. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.175. Epub 2016 May 11.
7
Clinical implementation of intensity modulated proton therapy for thoracic malignancies.调强质子治疗在胸部恶性肿瘤中的临床应用
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Nov 15;90(4):809-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.07.045. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
8
Use of single-energy proton pencil beam scanning Bragg peak for intensity-modulated proton therapy FLASH treatment planning in liver-hypofractionated radiation therapy.在肝部超分割放射治疗中,使用单能量质子笔形束扫描布拉格峰进行强度调制质子治疗 FLASH 治疗计划。
Med Phys. 2022 Oct;49(10):6560-6574. doi: 10.1002/mp.15894. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
9
PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.基于 PTV 的 IMPT 优化,结合了计划风险体积与稳健优化。
Med Phys. 2013 Feb;40(2):021709. doi: 10.1118/1.4774363.
10
The feasibility of dose escalation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) with FDG PET/CT guided in esophageal cancer.在食管癌中使用氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层显像/计算机断层扫描(FDG PET/CT)引导的调强放射治疗(IMRT)和调强质子治疗(IMPT)进行剂量递增的可行性。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2022 Sep;18(5):1261-1267. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_382_22.

引用本文的文献

1
Proton beam therapy for esophageal cancer compared to existing treatments, including X-ray therapy and surgery.与包括X射线疗法和手术在内的现有治疗方法相比,质子束疗法用于治疗食管癌。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):106767. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106767.
2
Current status and prospect of particle therapy for esophageal cancer.食管癌粒子治疗的现状与展望
Precis Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jun 27;8(2):92-98. doi: 10.1002/pro6.1232. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Potential of automated online adaptive proton therapy to reduce margins for oesophageal cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Mean heart dose-based normal tissue complication probability model for pericardial effusion: a study in oesophageal cancer patients.基于平均心脏剂量的心包积液正常组织并发症概率模型:一项食管癌患者的研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 13;11(1):18166. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97605-9.
2
Randomized Study on Dose Escalation in Definitive Chemoradiation for Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer (ARTDECO Study).局部晚期食管癌患者根治性放化疗剂量递增的随机研究(ARTDECO研究)
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep 1;39(25):2816-2824. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03697. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
3
Ten-Year Outcome of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: The Randomized Controlled CROSS Trial.
自动化在线自适应质子治疗在减少食管癌边界方面的潜力。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jan 31;33:100712. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100712. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Efficacy and Safety in Proton Therapy and Photon Therapy for Patients With Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.质子治疗与光子治疗食管癌患者的疗效与安全性:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328136. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28136.
5
Achievements and challenges in normal tissue response modelling for proton therapy.质子治疗正常组织反应建模的成果与挑战
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022 Nov 7;24:118-120. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.11.004. eCollection 2022 Oct.
新辅助放化疗联合手术治疗食管癌的 10 年结果:随机对照 CROSS 试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jun 20;39(18):1995-2004. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03614. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
4
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
5
A study to investigate the influence of cardiac motion on the robustness of pencil beam scanning proton plans in oesophageal cancer.一项关于研究心脏运动对食管癌笔形束扫描质子治疗计划稳健性影响的研究。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020 Oct 13;16:50-53. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.09.003. eCollection 2020 Oct.
6
Acute Toxicities and Short-Term Patient Outcomes After Intensity-Modulated Proton Beam Radiation Therapy or Intensity-Modulated Photon Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Mayo Clinic Experience.调强质子束放疗或调强光子放疗治疗食管癌后的急性毒性和短期患者预后:梅奥诊所经验
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020 May 19;5(5):871-879. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.04.026. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.
7
Beam angle comparison for distal esophageal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy.调强质子治疗远端食管癌患者的射束角度比较。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Nov;21(11):141-152. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13049. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
8
High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis.现代放疗技术下食管癌同步放化疗高剂量与低剂量辐射的比较:一项荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2020 Aug 4;10:1222. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01222. eCollection 2020.
9
Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated proton therapy in neoadjuvant irradiation of locally advanced oesophageal cancer.容积调强弧形放疗与调强质子放疗在局部晚期食管癌新辅助放疗中的应用比较
Radiat Oncol. 2020 May 24;15(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01570-y.
10
Randomized Phase IIB Trial of Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.随机化的质子束治疗与调强放射治疗局部晚期食管癌的 IIB 期临床试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 10;38(14):1569-1579. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02503. Epub 2020 Mar 11.