Gouel Pierrick, Hapdey Sebastien, Dumouchel Arthur, Gardin Isabelle, Torfeh Eva, Hinault Pauline, Vera Pierre, Thureau Sebastien, Gensanne David
Quantification en Imagerie Fonctionnelle-Laboratoire d'Informatique, du Traitement de l'Information et des Systèmes Equipe d'accueil 4108 (QuantIF-LITIS EA4108), University of Rouen, Rouen, France.
Imaging Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France.
Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 20;12:841761. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.841761. eCollection 2022.
We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of and mappings derived from a multispectral pulse sequence (magnetic resonance image compilation, MAGiC) on 1.5-T MRI and with conventional sequences [gradient echo with variable flip angle (GRE-VFA) and multi-echo spin echo (ME-SE)] compared to the reference values for the purpose of radiotherapy treatment planning.
The accuracy of and measurements was evaluated with 2 coils [head and neck unit (HNU) and BODY coils] on phantoms using descriptive statistics and Bland-Altman analysis. The reproducibility and repeatability of and measurements were performed on 15 sessions with the HNU coil. The and synthetic sequences obtained by both methods were evaluated according to quality assurance (QA) requirements for radiotherapy. and measurements of the brain or prostate tissues of two groups of five subjects were also compared.
The phantom results showed good agreement (mean bias, 8.4%) between the two measurement methods for values between 490 and 2,385 ms and values between 25 and 400 ms. MAGiC gave discordant results for values below 220 ms (bias with the reference values, from 38% to 1,620%). measurements were accurately estimated below 400 ms (mean bias, 8.5%) by both methods. The QA assessments are in agreement with the recommendations of imaging for contouring purposes for radiotherapy planning. On patient data of the brain and prostate, the measurements of and by the two quantitative MRI (qMRI) methods were comparable (max difference, <7%).
This study shows that the accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of the multispectral pulse sequence (MAGiC) were compatible with its use for radiotherapy treatment planning in a range of values corresponding to soft tissues. Even validated for brain imaging, MAGiC could potentially be used for prostate qMRI.
我们旨在评估在1.5-T磁共振成像(MRI)上,通过多光谱脉冲序列(磁共振图像汇编,MAGiC)以及传统序列[可变翻转角梯度回波(GRE-VFA)和多回波自旋回波(ME-SE)]得出的 和 映射与参考值相比的准确性,以用于放射治疗计划。
使用描述性统计和Bland-Altman分析,在体模上用2个线圈[头颈单元(HNU)和体线圈]评估 和 测量的准确性。用HNU线圈在15个时间段内进行 和 测量的可重复性和重复性研究。根据放射治疗质量保证(QA)要求,对两种方法获得的 和 合成序列进行评估。还比较了两组各5名受试者的脑或前列腺组织的 和 测量值。
体模结果显示,对于490至2385毫秒之间的 值和25至400毫秒之间的 值,两种测量方法之间具有良好的一致性(平均偏差为8.4%)。对于低于220毫秒的 值,MAGiC给出了不一致的结果(与参考值的偏差为38%至1620%)。两种方法在400毫秒以下均能准确估计 测量值(平均偏差为8.5%)。QA评估与放射治疗计划轮廓勾画成像的建议一致。在脑和前列腺的患者数据上,两种定量MRI(qMRI)方法对 和 的测量结果具有可比性(最大差异<7%)。
本研究表明,多光谱脉冲序列(MAGiC)在一系列对应于软组织的值范围内,其准确性、可重复性和重复性与用于放射治疗计划是兼容的。即使已通过脑成像验证,但MAGiC也有可能用于前列腺qMRI。