Suppr超能文献

电子烟产品中调味成分的毒理学评估。

Toxicological Assessment of Flavor Ingredients in E-Vapor Products.

作者信息

Sciuscio Davide, Calvino-Martin Florian, Kumar Ashutosh, Langston Timothy B, Martin Elyette, Marescotti Diego, Mathis Carole, Hoeng Julia, Peitsch Manuel C, Smith Donna C, Gogova Maria, Vanscheeuwijck Patrick, Lee Kyeonghee M

机构信息

PMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A., Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

Altria Client Services LLC, Richmond, VA, United States.

出版信息

Front Toxicol. 2022 Apr 20;4:878976. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2022.878976. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Many flavor ingredients are often used in potentially reduced-risk tobacco products (such as e-vapor products). Although most are "generally recognized as safe (GRAS)" when used in food, there is limited information available on their long-term health effects when delivered by inhalation. While obtaining route-of-exposure-specific toxicological data on flavor ingredients is critical to product evaluation, the large number of individual flavor ingredients available and their potential combinations render classical toxicological assessment approaches impractical, as they may require years of preclinical investigations and thousands of laboratory animals. Therefore, we propose a pragmatic approach in which flavor ingredients are initially assigned to groups of structurally related compounds (Flavor Groups), from which flavor group representatives (FGR) are then selected and tested individually and as a mixture and . The premise is that structurally related compounds would have comparable metabolic and biological activity and that the data generated using FGRs could support the toxicological assessment of other structurally related flavor ingredients of their respective Flavor Groups. This approach is explained in a step-wise manner and exemplified by a case study, along with its strengths, limitations as well as recommendations for further confirmatory testing. Once completed, this FGR approach could significantly reduce the time and resources required for filling the data gap in understanding the health risks of many flavor ingredients while also minimizing the need for laboratory animals.

摘要

许多调味成分常用于潜在风险降低的烟草制品(如电子烟产品)中。虽然大多数在用于食品时被“普遍认为是安全的(GRAS)”,但关于通过吸入方式摄入时它们对健康的长期影响,现有信息有限。虽然获取特定暴露途径的调味成分毒理学数据对产品评估至关重要,但现有的大量单一调味成分及其潜在组合使得传统毒理学评估方法不切实际,因为这可能需要数年的临床前研究和数千只实验动物。因此,我们提出一种务实的方法,即首先将调味成分分配到结构相关化合物组(调味组),然后从这些组中选择调味组代表(FGR)进行单独测试和混合测试。前提是结构相关的化合物具有可比的代谢和生物活性,并且使用FGR生成的数据可以支持对其各自调味组中其他结构相关调味成分的毒理学评估。本文将逐步解释这种方法,并通过一个案例研究进行举例说明,同时阐述其优点、局限性以及进一步验证性测试的建议。一旦完成,这种FGR方法可以显著减少填补许多调味成分健康风险数据空白所需的时间和资源,同时也最大限度地减少对实验动物的数据需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ad/9065440/93b689676417/ftox-04-878976-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验