Sheshadri Veena, Wasserman Isaac, Peters Alexander W, Santhirapala Vatshalan, Mitra Shivani, Sandler Simone, Svensson Emma, Ljungman David, George Regi, Ambepu Arundhathi, Krishnan Jithendranath, Kataria Raman, Afshar Salim, Meara John G, Galea Jerome T, Weinstock Peter, Roussin Christopher, Taylor Matthew, Menon Nandakumar, McClain Craig D
Gudalur Adivasi Hospital, Gudalur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Aug 13;7(3):140-145. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000577. eCollection 2021.
The benefits of simulation-based medical training are well described. The most effective way to plant and scale simulation training in rural locations remains undescribed. We sought to plant simulation training programmes for anaesthesia emergencies in two rural Indian hospitals.
Two Indian consultant anaesthetists without experience in medical simulation underwent a 3-day course at the Boston Children's Hospital's (BCH) Simulator Program. They returned to their institutions and launched simulation programmes with an airway manikin and mock patient monitor. The 1-year experience was evaluated using individual, in-depth interviews of simulation facilitators. Three staff members (responsible for facilitating medical simulations over the prior year) at two rural hospitals in India were interviewed. None attended the BCH training; instead, they received on-the-job training from the BCH-trained, consultant anaesthetist colleagues.
Successes included organisational adoption of simulation training with exercises 1 year after the initial BCH-training, increased interdisciplinary teamwork and improved clinical competency in managing emergencies. Barriers to effective, local implementation of simulation programmes fell into three categories: time required to run simulations, fixed and rigid roles, and variable resources. Thematic improvement requests were for standardised resources to help train simulation facilitators and demonstrate to participants a well-run simulation, in addition to context-sensitive scenarios.
An in-person training of simulation facilitators to promote medical simulation programmes in rural hospitals produced ongoing simulation programmes 1 year later. In order to make these programmes sustainable, however, increased investment in developing simulation facilitators is required. In particular, simulation facilitators must be prepared to formally train other simulation facilitators, too.
基于模拟的医学培训的益处已得到充分描述。在农村地区开展和推广模拟培训的最有效方法仍未得到描述。我们试图在印度的两家农村医院开展麻醉急救模拟培训项目。
两名没有医学模拟经验的印度麻醉科顾问医师在波士顿儿童医院(BCH)模拟项目参加了为期3天的课程。他们回到各自的机构,使用气道模型和模拟患者监护仪启动了模拟项目。通过对模拟培训促进者进行个人深度访谈来评估这一年的经验。对印度两家农村医院的三名工作人员(负责前一年的医学模拟促进工作)进行了访谈。他们都没有参加BCH的培训;相反,他们接受了来自参加过BCH培训的麻醉科顾问医师同事的在职培训。
成功之处包括在最初的BCH培训一年后,机构采用了模拟培训并开展了演练,跨学科团队合作增加,以及在处理紧急情况方面临床能力得到提高。有效在当地实施模拟项目的障碍分为三类:开展模拟所需的时间、固定且刻板的角色以及资源的变化。主题改进要求包括提供标准化资源,以帮助培训模拟培训促进者,并向参与者展示一场运作良好的模拟,此外还需要根据具体情况设置场景。
对模拟培训促进者进行面对面培训以在农村医院推广医学模拟项目,一年后产生了持续开展的模拟项目。然而,为了使这些项目可持续,需要增加对培养模拟培训促进者的投入。特别是,模拟培训促进者必须准备好也对其他模拟培训促进者进行正式培训。