• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predicting team-performance and leadership in emergency situations by observing standardised operational procedures: a prospective single-blind simulator-based trial.通过观察标准化操作程序预测紧急情况下的团队绩效和领导力:一项基于前瞻性单盲模拟的试验。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018 Jul 11;5(2):102-107. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000342. eCollection 2019.
2
Effects of team leaders' position in cardiopulmonary resuscitation teams on leadership behavior and team performance: A prospective randomized interventional cross-over simulation-based trial.心肺复苏团队中团队领导的职位对领导行为和团队表现的影响:一项前瞻性随机干预交叉模拟试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jul 7;102(27):e34235. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034235.
3
Factors affecting team leadership skills and their relationship with quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.影响团队领导技能的因素及其与心肺复苏质量的关系。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Sep;40(9):2617-21. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182591fda.
4
A comparative study of defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during simulated cardiac arrest in nursing student teams.在模拟心脏骤停期间对护理学生团队的除颤和心肺复苏表现进行比较研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Apr 2;20:23. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-23.
5
Cardiac Arrest Nurse Leadership (CANLEAD) trial: a simulation-based randomised controlled trial implementation of a new cardiac arrest role to facilitate cognitive offload for medical team leaders.心脏骤停护士领导(CANLEAD)试验:一项基于模拟的随机对照试验,实施一种新的心脏骤停角色,以方便医疗团队领导的认知减负。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Aug;38(8):572-578. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-209298. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
6
Effect of CRM team leader training on team performance and leadership behavior in simulated cardiac arrest scenarios: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.模拟心脏骤停场景中CRM团队领导者培训对团队绩效和领导行为的影响:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Jul 24;15:116. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0389-z.
7
Who is the real team leader? Comparing leadership performance of the team leader and CPR Coach during simulated cardiac arrest.谁是真正的团队领导者?比较团队领导者和心肺复苏教练在模拟心脏骤停期间的领导表现。
Resusc Plus. 2023 May 24;14:100400. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100400. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Leadership and teamwork in medical emergencies: performance of nursing students and registered nurses in simulated patient scenarios.医疗紧急情况中的领导力与团队合作:护理专业学生和注册护士在模拟患者场景中的表现
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Jan;24(1-2):90-100. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12611. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
9
Brief leadership instructions improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a high-fidelity simulation: a randomized controlled trial.简短的领导力指导可提高高保真模拟心肺复苏中的表现:一项随机对照试验。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Apr;38(4):1086-91. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cf7383.
10
Leadership of resuscitation teams: "Lighthouse Leadership'.复苏团队的领导:“灯塔式领导”
Resuscitation. 1999 Sep;42(1):27-45. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(99)00080-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Team leader communication in ad hoc teams and its impact on team outcomes: a systematic review.临时团队中的团队领导沟通及其对团队成果的影响:一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12887-3.

本文引用的文献

1
2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS.2016年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的心房颤动管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Oct 7;37(38):2893-2962. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
2
Cardioversion in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.非瓣膜性心房颤动的心脏复律
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Dec 11;112(50):856-62. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0856.
3
Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第5部分:成人基础生命支持和心肺复苏质量:2015美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南更新
Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S414-35. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000259.
4
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams.提高工作团队的效率。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Dec;7(3):77-124. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x. Epub 2006 Dec 1.
5
A systematic review of teamwork in the intensive care unit: what do we know about teamwork, team tasks, and improvement strategies?对重症监护病房团队合作的系统评价:我们对团队合作、团队任务和改进策略了解多少?
J Crit Care. 2014 Dec;29(6):908-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.05.025. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
6
Seven years experience of a nurse-led elective cardioversion service in a tertiary referral centre: an observational study.在一家三级转诊中心开展由护士主导的择期心脏复律服务的七年经验:一项观察性研究。
Heart Lung Circ. 2014 Jun;23(6):555-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
7
2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会心房颤动患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组及心律学会的报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 2;64(21):e1-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
8
Helping fluid teams work: A research agenda for effective team adaptation in healthcare.帮助流体团队工作:医疗保健中有效团队适应的研究议程。
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Dec;2(4):504-9. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0177-9.
9
Can medical school performance predict residency performance? Resident selection and predictors of successful performance in obstetrics and gynecology.医学院校的表现能否预测住院医师阶段的表现?妇产科住院医师选拔及成功表现的预测因素。
J Grad Med Educ. 2010 Sep;2(3):322-6. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-09-00101.1.
10
Activities during interruptions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a simulator study.心肺复苏中断期间的活动:一项模拟研究。
Resuscitation. 2011 Nov;82(11):1419-23. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.06.023. Epub 2011 Jun 29.

通过观察标准化操作程序预测紧急情况下的团队绩效和领导力:一项基于前瞻性单盲模拟的试验。

Predicting team-performance and leadership in emergency situations by observing standardised operational procedures: a prospective single-blind simulator-based trial.

作者信息

Tschan Franziska, Semmer Norbert K, Vetterli Maria, Hunziker Patrick R, Marsch Stephan C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

Department of Psychology, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018 Jul 11;5(2):102-107. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000342. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000342
PMID:35519829
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8936739/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Performance of interdisciplinary teams and their leaders is crucial in acute medical care and can be monitored by observing specific events. Standardised operational procedures (SOP) are easily observable, whereas the unpredictability of medical emergencies makes performance monitoring in these situations difficult. The aim of this study was therefore to assess whether performance in emergency situations can be predicted by performance observed during an SOP.

METHODS

30 intensive care unit teams composed of one staff physician (leader), one resident and three nurses performed a simulated scenario of an elective electrical cardioversion (SOP) followed by a cardiac arrest (emergency). Video recordings obtained during simulations were used for data analysis. The primary outcome was the correlation between performance scores of electrical cardioversion and performance during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (hands-on time, time to first defibrillation).

RESULTS

None of the cardioversion performance scores significantly correlated with resuscitation performance. Leadership scores during electrical cardioversion correlated positively with leadership scores during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (=0.365, p=0.047). Moreover, there was a positive correlation of leaders being hands-off during both electrical cardioversion and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (=0.645, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Team performance in SOP carried no predictive value for emergency situations. Observing teams in easily observable SOP is therefore no suitable substitute for monitoring the performance in medical emergencies. There was a between-situation consistency for specific elements of leadership.

摘要

背景

跨学科团队及其领导者在急性医疗护理中的表现至关重要,可通过观察特定事件进行监测。标准化操作程序(SOP)易于观察,而医疗紧急情况的不可预测性使得在这些情况下进行绩效监测变得困难。因此,本研究的目的是评估在SOP期间观察到的绩效是否可以预测紧急情况下的绩效。

方法

由一名主治医师(领导者)、一名住院医师和三名护士组成的30个重症监护病房团队进行了择期电复律模拟场景(SOP),随后进行心脏骤停(紧急情况)。模拟过程中获得的视频记录用于数据分析。主要结果是电复律绩效得分与心肺复苏期间的绩效(实际操作时间、首次除颤时间)之间的相关性。

结果

电复律绩效得分与复苏绩效均无显著相关性。电复律期间的领导能力得分与心肺复苏期间的领导能力得分呈正相关(=0.365,p=0.047)。此外,在电复律和心肺复苏期间领导者放手操作之间存在正相关(=0.645,p<0.0001)。

结论

SOP中的团队绩效对紧急情况没有预测价值。因此,在易于观察的SOP中观察团队并不能替代监测医疗紧急情况中的绩效。领导能力的特定要素在不同情境之间存在一致性。