肾损伤重症患者预后的猜谜游戏：有满分答案吗？
Guessing Game of Patient Outcomes in the Renally Injured Critically Ill: Is There a Perfect Score?
作者信息
Raju Gautham M
机构信息
Department of Critical Care, St John's Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
出版信息
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar;26(3):253-255. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24177.
Abstract
Raju GM. Guessing Game of Patient Outcomes in the Renally Injured Critically Ill: Is There a Perfect Score? Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(3):253-255.
摘要
拉朱·GM。危重症肾损伤患者预后的猜谜游戏：有满分答案吗？《印度重症监护医学杂志》2022年；26(3):253 - 255。
相似文献
1
Guessing Game of Patient Outcomes in the Renally Injured Critically Ill: Is There a Perfect Score?肾损伤重症患者预后的猜谜游戏：有满分答案吗？
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar;26(3):253-255. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24177.
2
Evaluation and Validation of Four Scoring Systems: the APACHE IV, SAPS III, MPM0 II, and ICMM in Critically Ill Cancer Patients.四种评分系统的评估与验证：急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统IV（APACHE IV）、序贯器官衰竭评估（SAPS III）、第二代多器官功能不全评分（MPM0 II）以及危重症癌症患者综合评分（ICMM）
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr;24(4):263-269. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23407.
3
Comparison of the Performance of APACHE II, SOFA, and mNUTRIC Scoring Systems in Critically Ill Patients: A 2-year Cross-sectional Study.急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II（APACHE II）、序贯器官衰竭评估（SOFA）和改良营养风险及预后评估（mNUTRIC）评分系统在危重症患者中的性能比较：一项为期2年的横断面研究
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;24(11):1057-1061. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23549.
4
Role of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scoring system in determining the severity and prognosis of critically ill patients in pediatric intensive care unit.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估II评分系统在判定儿科重症监护病房危重症患儿病情严重程度及预后中的作用
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2015 Aug;19(8):462-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.162463.
5
Performance evaluation of APACHE II score for an Indian patient with respiratory problems.用于评估印度呼吸疾病患者的急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统（APACHE II）的性能评价
Indian J Med Res. 2004 Jun;119(6):273-82.
6
iPad with iPad-based Apps: An Optimal Communications Tool in the Intensive Care Unit?配备基于iPad应用程序的iPad：重症监护病房中的最佳通信工具？
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov;25(11):1217-1218. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24034.
7
Comparison of Epidemiology and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients with and without Sepsis.伴有和不伴有脓毒症的危重症患者急性肾损伤的流行病学及预后比较
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr;24(4):258-262. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23386.
8
AKI-CLIF-SOFA: a novel prognostic score for critically ill cirrhotic patients with acute kidney injury.AKI-CLIF-SOFA：一种用于急性肾损伤的危重症肝硬化患者的新型预后评分系统。
Aging (Albany NY). 2017 Jan 19;9(1):286-296. doi: 10.18632/aging.101161.
9
Performance of standard severity scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients admitted to a respiratory intensive care unit in North India.印度北部一家呼吸重症监护病房收治患者的标准严重程度评分系统对预后预测的性能。
Respirology. 2006 Mar;11(2):196-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.00828.x.
10
[Clinical characteristics of critically ill pregnant women with different admission methods to intensive care unit: data analysis from 2006 to 2019 in the university hospital].[重症监护病房不同收治方式的危重症孕妇临床特征：某大学医院2006年至2019年数据分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Oct;33(10):1249-1254. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210106-00013.
本文引用的文献
1
Assessment of APACHE II Score to Predict ICU Outcomes of Patients with AKI: A Single-center Experience from Haryana, North India.评估急性肾损伤患者的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II（APACHE II）得分以预测其重症监护病房结局：来自印度北部哈里亚纳邦的单中心经验。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar;26(3):276-281. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24142.
2
SOFA score is superior to APACHE-II score in predicting the prognosis of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.SOFA 评分优于 APACHE-II 评分，可预测行连续性肾脏替代治疗的急性肾损伤危重患者的预后。
Ren Fail. 2020 Nov;42(1):638-645. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2020.1788581.
3
Discrimination and Calibration of Clinical Prediction Models: Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.临床预测模型的判别与校准：医学文献的使用者指南。
JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1377-1384. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12126.
4
AKI and Long-Term Risk for Cardiovascular Events and Mortality.急性肾损伤与心血管事件和死亡的长期风险
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jan;28(1):377-387. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016010105. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
5
A calibration hierarchy for risk models was defined: from utopia to empirical data.定义了风险模型的校准层次结构：从理想状态到经验数据。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;74:167-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.005. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
6
Evaluating Discrimination of Risk Prediction Models: The C Statistic.评估风险预测模型的判别力：C统计量
JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1063-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.11082.
7
A Prospective International Multicenter Study of AKI in the Intensive Care Unit.一项关于重症监护病房急性肾损伤的前瞻性国际多中心研究。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Aug 7;10(8):1324-31. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04360514. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
8
Assessment of KDIGO definitions in patients with histopathologic evidence of acute renal disease.对有急性肾疾病组织病理学证据患者的KDIGO定义评估。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Jul;9(7):1175-82. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06150613. Epub 2014 May 1.
9
Performance of the third-generation models of severity scoring systems (APACHE IV, SAPS 3 and MPM-III) in acute kidney injury critically ill patients.第三代严重程度评分系统（APACHE IV、SAPS 3 和 MPM-III）在急性肾损伤危重症患者中的表现。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Dec;26(12):3894-901. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr201. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
10
Identifying critically ill patients at high risk for developing acute renal failure: a pilot study.识别有发生急性肾衰竭高风险的重症患者：一项试点研究。
Kidney Int. 2005 Nov;68(5):2274-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00686.x.
Zotero 插件