• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫苗实施计划与公平获取疫苗。

COVAX and equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines.

机构信息

Health Nutrition and Population, World Bank, 701 18th St NW, Washington, DC 20006, United States of America (USA).

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 2022 May 1;100(5):315-328. doi: 10.2471/BLT.21.287516. Epub 2022 Mar 25.

DOI:10.2471/BLT.21.287516
PMID:35521037
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9047429/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate equity in the allocation and distribution of vaccines for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to countries and territories participating in the COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access (COVAX) Facility.

METHODS

We used publicly available data on the numbers of COVAX vaccine doses allocated and distributed to 88 countries and territories qualifying for COVAX-sponsored vaccine doses and 60 countries self-financing their vaccine doses facilitated by COVAX. We conducted a benefit-incident analysis to examine the allocation and distribution of vaccines based on countries' gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. We plotted cumulative country-level per capita allocation and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines from COVAX against the ranked per capita GDP of the countries and territories to generate a measure of the equity of COVAX benefits.

FINDINGS

By 23 January 2022 the COVAX Facility had allocated a total of 1 678 517 990 COVID-19 vaccine doses, of which 1 028 291 430 (61%) doses were distributed to 148 countries and territories. Taking account of COVAX subsidies, we found that countries and territories with low per capita GDP benefited more than higher-income countries in the numbers of vaccines. The benefits increased further when the analysis was adjusted by population age group (aged 65 years and older).

CONCLUSION

The COVAX Facility is helping to balance global inequities in the allocation and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines. However, COVAX alone has not been enough to reverse the inequality of total COVID-19 vaccine distribution. Future studies could examine the equity of all COVID-19 vaccine allocation and distribution beyond the COVAX-facilitated vaccines.

摘要

目的

评估参与新冠肺炎疫苗实施计划(COVAX)的国家和地区获得 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗的分配和供应的公平性。

方法

我们使用了公开的数据,这些数据涉及到向有资格获得 COVAX 赞助疫苗剂量的 88 个国家和地区以及由 COVAX 提供便利、自行出资购买疫苗的 60 个国家分配和供应的 COVAX 疫苗数量。我们进行了受益事件分析,根据各国人均国内生产总值(GDP)来检查疫苗的分配和供应情况。我们绘制了 COVAX 分配的 COVID-19 疫苗在各国的人均累计分配和供应情况,以及这些国家和地区的人均 GDP 排名,以衡量 COVAX 利益的公平性。

发现

截至 2022 年 1 月 23 日,COVAX 基金总共分配了 1678517990 剂 COVID-19 疫苗,其中 1028291430 剂(61%)分配给了 148 个国家和地区。考虑到 COVAX 的补贴,我们发现人均 GDP 较低的国家和地区在疫苗数量上比高收入国家受益更多。当按人口年龄组(65 岁及以上)调整分析时,获益进一步增加。

结论

COVAX 基金有助于平衡 COVID-19 疫苗在分配和供应方面的全球不平等。然而,仅 COVAX 基金本身还不足以扭转 COVID-19 疫苗总分配的不平等。未来的研究可以在 COVAX 便利疫苗之外,进一步审查所有 COVID-19 疫苗分配和供应的公平性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfb2/9047429/c7a9b2ce0d56/BLT.21.287516-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfb2/9047429/484146330a6e/BLT.21.287516-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfb2/9047429/4c0e6110cbe5/BLT.21.287516-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfb2/9047429/9dd91d76750c/BLT.21.287516-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfb2/9047429/c7a9b2ce0d56/BLT.21.287516-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfb2/9047429/484146330a6e/BLT.21.287516-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfb2/9047429/4c0e6110cbe5/BLT.21.287516-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfb2/9047429/9dd91d76750c/BLT.21.287516-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfb2/9047429/c7a9b2ce0d56/BLT.21.287516-F4.jpg

相似文献

1
COVAX and equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines.新冠疫苗实施计划与公平获取疫苗。
Bull World Health Organ. 2022 May 1;100(5):315-328. doi: 10.2471/BLT.21.287516. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
2
International Collaboration to Ensure Equitable Access to Vaccines for COVID-19: The ACT-Accelerator and the COVAX Facility.国际合作确保公平获取 COVID-19 疫苗:ACT-Accelerator 和 COVAX 设施。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):426-449. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12503. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
3
Risky business: COVAX and the financialization of global vaccine equity.高风险的生意:COVAX 与全球疫苗公平的金融化。
Global Health. 2021 Sep 20;17(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00763-8.
4
Reserving coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines for global access: cross sectional analysis.预留 2019 冠状病毒病疫苗以实现全球可及:横断面分析。
BMJ. 2020 Dec 15;371:m4750. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4750.
5
COVAX, vaccine donations and the politics of global vaccine inequity.新冠疫苗全球获取机制、疫苗捐赠与全球疫苗不平等的政治问题
Global Health. 2022 Mar 5;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00801-z.
6
Mitigating donor interests in the case of COVID-19 vaccine: the implication of COVAX and DAC membership.减轻 COVID-19 疫苗供应方的利益考量:COVAX 和 DAC 成员资格的影响。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jan;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010188.
7
[Dilemma, causes and countermeasures of global health governance: taking COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access Facility as an example].[全球卫生治理的困境、成因与对策:以新冠疫苗全球获取机制为例]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Apr 10;43(4):483-487. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20211216-00987.
8
Expert Views on COVAX and Equitable Global Access to COVID-19 Vaccines.专家观点:关于 COVAX 以及公平获取 COVID-19 疫苗
Int J Public Health. 2021 Dec 31;66:1604236. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2021.1604236. eCollection 2021.
9
Inequities in the deployment of COVID-19 vaccine in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region, 2020-2021.2020-2021 年世卫组织东地中海区域 COVID-19 疫苗部署的不公平现象。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Jun;7(Suppl 4). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008139.
10
Business as Usual? Centering Human Rights to Advance Global COVID-19 Vaccine Equity Through COVAX.一切照旧?通过 COVAX 以人权为中心推进全球 COVID-19 疫苗公平性。
Health Hum Rights. 2022 Dec;24(2):219-228.

引用本文的文献

1
Key lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic: Role of intensive care, politics and science communication (Review).2019冠状病毒病大流行的关键经验教训:重症监护、政治及科学传播的作用(综述)
Med Int (Lond). 2025 Aug 8;5(5):60. doi: 10.3892/mi.2025.259. eCollection 2025 Sep-Oct.
2
Pandemic paradox: How the COVID-19 crisis transformed vaccine hesitancy into a two-edged sword.大流行悖论:新冠疫情危机如何将疫苗犹豫变成一把双刃剑。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2543167. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2543167. Epub 2025 Aug 12.
3
COVID-19 Predeparture Test Results and Vaccination Coverage among US-Bound Refugees, 2020-2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Global impact of vaccine nationalism during COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间疫苗民族主义的全球影响。
Trop Med Health. 2021 Dec 29;49(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s41182-021-00394-0.
2
The fight to manufacture COVID vaccines in lower-income countries.在低收入国家生产新冠疫苗的斗争。
Nature. 2021 Sep;597(7877):455-457. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-02383-z.
3
A global database of COVID-19 vaccinations.一个全球 COVID-19 疫苗接种数据库。
2020 - 2022年美国难民出发前新冠病毒检测结果及疫苗接种覆盖率
Emerg Infect Dis. 2025 Aug;31(8):1630-1635. doi: 10.3201/eid3108.250088.
4
Antispike IgG antibody decay after immunisation with fractional versus full booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines: a 6-month longitudinal analysis of the FRACT-COV trial in Brazil.接种部分剂量与完整加强剂量新冠疫苗后抗刺突 IgG 抗体的衰减情况:巴西 FRACT-COV 试验的 6 个月纵向分析
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Jul 5;3(2):e002331. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-002331. eCollection 2025.
5
On-Chip De Novo Production of mRNA Vaccine in Lipid Nanoparticles.脂质纳米颗粒中mRNA疫苗的片上从头生产
Small. 2025 Aug;21(32):e2500114. doi: 10.1002/smll.202500114. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
6
Beyond the Pandemic Era: Recent Advances and Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Against Emerging Variants of Concern.后疫情时代:SARS-CoV-2疫苗针对新出现的关注变异株的最新进展与效果
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;13(4):424. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13040424.
7
Global maternal mortality associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染相关的全球孕产妇死亡率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Apr 21;10(4):e015815. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015815.
8
Experts' Views on Factors Influencing Resource Allocation for Infectious Disease Emergencies Based on Humanitarian Principles: A Qualitative Study.基于人道主义原则的传染病突发事件资源分配影响因素专家观点:一项定性研究
AJPM Focus. 2024 Oct 5;4(1):100286. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100286. eCollection 2025 Feb.
9
COVID-19 Vaccination and Public Health: Addressing Global, Regional, and Within-Country Inequalities.2019冠状病毒病疫苗接种与公共卫生:应对全球、区域和国家内部的不平等问题
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Aug 4;12(8):885. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12080885.
10
Long COVID Syndrome: A Narrative Review on Burden of Age and Vaccination.长期新冠综合征:关于年龄负担和疫苗接种的叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 13;13(16):4756. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164756.
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jul;5(7):947-953. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01122-8. Epub 2021 May 10.
4
From Vaccine Nationalism to Vaccine Equity - Finding a Path Forward.从疫苗民族主义到疫苗公平——探寻前进之路
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 8;384(14):1281-1283. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2103614. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
5
Enhancing the WHO's Proposed Framework for Distributing COVID-19 Vaccines Among Countries.加强世界卫生组织关于在各国间分配新冠疫苗的提议框架。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Mar;111(3):371-373. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306098.
6
Covid-19: WHO warns against "vaccine nationalism" or face further virus mutations.新冠疫情:世卫组织警告谨防“疫苗民族主义”,否则将面临病毒进一步变异。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 1;372:n292. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n292.
7
Benefit incidence analysis in public health facilities in India: utilization and benefits at the national and state levels.印度公共卫生机构的受益情况分析:国家和邦层面的利用情况和受益情况。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jan 21;18(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0921-6.
8
On correcting the concentration index for binary variables.纠正二项变量集中指数。
J Health Econ. 2013 May;32(3):659-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
9
Measuring socioeconomic inequality in health, health care and health financing by means of rank-dependent indices: a recipe for good practice.用基于等级的指数衡量健康、医疗保健和卫生筹资方面的社会经济不平等:良好实践的秘诀。
J Health Econ. 2011 Jul;30(4):685-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 May 11.
10
On the measurement of inequalities in health.论健康不平等的衡量。
Soc Sci Med. 1991;33(5):545-57. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90212-u.