Ngo Christian, Akoum Nazem
Department of Cardiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2022 Apr 15;13(4):4968-4980. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2022.130402. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Catheter ablation as a treatment method for both ventricular and atrial arrhythmias has evolved significantly over the past 40 years since it was first performed in humans. This evolution has been paralleled by a similar expansion in both invasive and non-invasive imaging modalities directed at further elucidating cardiac morphology and arrhythmia substrate pathophysiology. Access to multimodality imaging options is a significant piece of the armamentarium available to interventional electrophysiologists who are tackling increasingly complex rhythm problems with catheter ablation. This presents a unique problem to the practicing electrophysiologist in selecting the most pertinent imaging modalities that will improve the safety and efficacy of a procedure and winnowing out potential imaging studies that offer minimal or marginal benefit. In this review, we evaluate the various modalities that are useful in planning and executing successful ablation and weigh the evidence for benefit.
自首次应用于人体以来,在过去40年里,导管消融作为治疗室性和房性心律失常的一种方法已经有了显著发展。在侵入性和非侵入性成像模式方面也有类似的扩展,旨在进一步阐明心脏形态和心律失常基质的病理生理学,这种扩展与导管消融的发展并行。对于那些通过导管消融处理日益复杂的节律问题的介入电生理学家来说,获得多模态成像选项是其可用装备中的重要组成部分。这给执业电生理学家带来了一个独特的问题,即选择最相关的成像模式以提高手术的安全性和有效性,并筛选出益处最小或微不足道的潜在成像研究。在本综述中,我们评估了有助于规划和实施成功消融的各种模式,并权衡了其获益证据。