Suppr超能文献

证据表明英语、荷兰语和德语共享一个工具原型。

Evidence for a Shared Instrument Prototype from English, Dutch, and German.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Center for Language Studies, Radboud University.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2022 May;46(5):e13140. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13140.

Abstract

At conceptual and linguistic levels of cognition, events are said to be represented in terms of abstract categories, for example, the sentence Jackie cut the bagel with a knife encodes the categories Agent (i.e., Jackie) and Patient (i.e., the bagel). In this paper, we ask whether entities such as the knife are also represented in terms of such a category (often labeled "Instrument") and, if so, whether this category has a prototype structure. We hypothesized the Proto-instrument is a tool: a physical object manipulated by an intentional agent to affect a change in another individual or object. To test this, we asked speakers of English, Dutch, and German to complete an event description task and a sentence acceptability judgment task in which events were viewed with more or less prototypical instruments. We found broad similarities in how English, Dutch, and German partition the semantic space of instrumental events, suggesting there is a shared concept of the Instrument category. However, there was no evidence to support the specific hypothesis that tools are the core of the Instrument category-instead, our results suggest the most prototypical Instrument is the direct extension of an intentional agent. This paper supports theoretical frameworks where thematic roles are analyzed in terms of prototypes and suggests new avenues of research on how instrumental category structure differs across linguistic and conceptual domains.

摘要

在认知的概念和语言层面上,事件据说可以用抽象类别来表示,例如,句子“Jackie 用刀切开了百吉饼”编码了两个类别:施事者(即 Jackie)和受事者(即百吉饼)。在本文中,我们询问诸如刀之类的实体是否也可以用这样的类别(通常称为“工具”)来表示,如果是这样,这个类别是否具有原型结构。我们假设原型工具是一种工具:一种由意向主体操纵以影响另一个个体或物体变化的物理对象。为了检验这一点,我们要求说英语、荷兰语和德语的人完成一个事件描述任务和一个句子可接受性判断任务,在这些任务中,使用了或多或少具有原型工具的事件。我们发现英语、荷兰语和德语在划分工具事件的语义空间方面有广泛的相似之处,这表明存在一种共享的工具类别概念。然而,没有证据支持工具是工具类别核心的具体假设——相反,我们的结果表明,最具原型性的工具是意向主体的直接延伸。本文支持了将主题角色分析为原型的理论框架,并为研究语言和概念领域中工具类别结构的差异提供了新的研究途径。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/805b/9285710/7de827ca8eb7/COGS-46-0-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验