Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
J Affect Disord. 2022 Aug 1;310:354-368. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.151. Epub 2022 May 3.
Lifestyle medicine (LM) is gaining increasing attention as a treatment option for anxiety, but the current state of evidence has not yet been systematically examined.
Six electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to February 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of multicomponent LM interventions on anxiety symptoms with either care-as-usual, waitlist, no intervention, or attention control group on anxiety symptoms were identified.
A total of 53 RCTs with 18,894 participants were included for qualitative synthesis, in which 45 RCTs with data available were included for meta-analysis. Multicomponent LM intervention was significantly more effective than the control groups in reducing anxiety symptoms at immediate posttreatment (d = 0.19, p < .001) and at short-term follow-up (d = 0.29, p < .001). However, no significant difference at medium-term was found (p = .14), whereas more studies are needed to study the long-term effects. The subgroup analyses suggested that baseline anxiety symptoms was a significant moderator, suggesting that those with moderate level of baseline anxiety symptoms appeared to have greater improvements (d = 0.66, p < .05).
Minimal anxiety symptoms at baseline contributed to the floor effect and influenced the degree of improvement. The included RCTs had a high risk of bias in general with potential publication bias detected.
The findings of this meta-analysis provided support for the positive effects of multicomponent LM interventions for anxiety symptoms. Future research is needed to determine the long-term effects of multicimponent LM and the optimal baseline anxiety severity.
生活方式医学(LM)作为一种治疗焦虑的方法越来越受到关注,但目前的证据状况尚未得到系统检查。
从成立到 2022 年 2 月,系统地在六个电子数据库中进行了搜索。确定了比较多成分 LM 干预对焦虑症状的影响与常规护理、候补名单、无干预或对照组对焦虑症状的影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。
共有 53 项 RCT 纳入了 18894 名参与者进行定性综合分析,其中 45 项 RCT 提供了可用数据进行荟萃分析。多成分 LM 干预在治疗后即刻(d=0.19,p<.001)和短期随访(d=0.29,p<.001)时,与对照组相比,对焦虑症状的缓解效果更为显著。然而,在中期没有发现显著差异(p=.14),而需要更多的研究来研究长期效果。亚组分析表明,基线焦虑症状是一个显著的调节因素,表明那些基线焦虑症状处于中度水平的人似乎有更大的改善(d=0.66,p<.05)。
基线时的轻度焦虑症状导致了地板效应,并影响了改善的程度。纳入的 RCT 普遍存在高偏倚风险,并且检测到了潜在的发表偏倚。
这项荟萃分析的结果为多成分 LM 干预对焦虑症状的积极效果提供了支持。需要进一步的研究来确定多成分 LM 的长期效果和最佳基线焦虑严重程度。