A comparative study of demarcation line diagnostic performance between non-magnifying observation with white light and non-magnifying observation with narrow-band light for early gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

With the improvement in endoscopic equipment functions, narrow-band imaging (NBI) for endoscopic observation of the stomach, which is an organ with a large lumen, is now feasible. Studies evaluating the NBI utility without magnifying endoscopy to diagnose the invasion extent for the demarcation line identification in early gastric cancer have not been reported. This study aimed to investigate the demarcation line diagnostic performance of NBI in early gastric cancer compared to that of white-light imaging (WLI) using prospectively collected consecutive specimens from early gastric cancer patients.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive lesions were collected from patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Next, 30 NBI and 30 WLI images, each with the same degree of gastric wall extension, angle, and layout for one lesion, were selected, and a total of 60 images were prepared for testing. The early gastric cancer invasion ranges in the endoscopic images was plotted using the web-developed software, and 264 independent endoscopists, unaware of the diagnosis, performed the web tests, with the concordance rates between the ranges of responses. After estimating the actual early gastric cancer invasion ranges, the NBI and WLI results were compared.

RESULTS

The concordance rates for NBI and WLI images were 43.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 42.5-43.7%) and 37.2% (95% CI 36.6-37.7%), respectively, showing that the concordance rate for NBI was significantly higher than that for WLI.

CONCLUSION

This study suggested that NBI was more useful for identifying demarcation lines than WLI.