• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同设计罕见病基因检测结果沟通模型:捷克共和国与英国的比较研究

Co-designing models for the communication of genomic results for rare diseases: a comparative study in the Czech Republic and the United Kingdom.

作者信息

Costa Alessia, Franková Věra, Robert Glenn, Macek Milan, Patch Christine, Alexander Elizabeth, Arellanesova Anna, Clayton-Smith Jill, Hunter Amy, Havlovicová Markéta, Pourová Radka, Pritchard Marie, Roberts Lauren, Zoubková Veronika, Metcalfe Alison

机构信息

Engagement and Society, Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, Cambridgeshire, UK.

Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, SE1 8WA, UK.

出版信息

J Community Genet. 2022 Jun;13(3):313-327. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00589-w. Epub 2022 May 6.

DOI:10.1007/s12687-022-00589-w
PMID:35523996
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9075921/
Abstract

The communication of genomic results to patients and families with rare diseases raise distinctive challenges. However, there is little evidence about optimal methods to communicate results to this group of service users. To address this gap, we worked with rare disease families and health professionals from two genetic/genomic services, one in the United Kingdom and one in the Czech Republic, to co-design that best meet their needs. Using the participatory methodology of Experience-Based Co-Design (EBCD), we conducted observations of clinical appointments (n=49) and interviews with family participants (n=23) and health professionals (n=22) to gather their experience of sharing/receiving results. The findings informed a facilitated co-design process, comprising 3 feedback events at each site and a series of meetings and remote consultations. Participants identified a total of four areas of current service models in need of improvement, and co-designed six prototypes of quality improvement interventions. The main finding was the identification of post-test care as the shared priority for improvement for both health professionals and families at the two sites. Our findings indicate the need to strengthen the link between diagnostics (whether or not a pathogenic variant is found) and post-test care, including psychosocial and community support. This raises implications for the reconfigurations of genomic service models, the redefinition of professional roles and responsibilities and the involvement of rare disease patients and families in health care research.

摘要

向患有罕见病的患者及其家属传达基因组检测结果带来了独特的挑战。然而,几乎没有证据表明向这类服务用户传达结果的最佳方法是什么。为了填补这一空白,我们与来自英国和捷克共和国的两个遗传/基因组服务机构的罕见病患者家庭及医疗专业人员合作,共同设计最能满足他们需求的方法。我们采用基于经验的协同设计(EBCD)这一参与式方法,对临床预约进行了观察(n = 49),并对患者家属(n = 23)和医疗专业人员(n = 22)进行了访谈,以收集他们分享/接收检测结果的经验。这些发现为一个促进性的协同设计过程提供了依据,该过程包括在每个地点举办3次反馈活动以及一系列会议和远程咨询。参与者共确定了当前服务模式中需要改进的四个领域,并共同设计了六个质量改进干预措施的原型。主要发现是,两个地点的医疗专业人员和患者家庭都将检测后护理视为共同的优先改进事项。我们的研究结果表明,需要加强诊断(无论是否发现致病变异)与检测后护理之间的联系,包括心理社会和社区支持。这对基因组服务模式的重新配置、专业角色和职责的重新定义以及罕见病患者和家庭参与医疗保健研究都具有启示意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64bc/9270547/23d77da946ab/12687_2022_589_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64bc/9270547/23d77da946ab/12687_2022_589_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64bc/9270547/23d77da946ab/12687_2022_589_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Co-designing models for the communication of genomic results for rare diseases: a comparative study in the Czech Republic and the United Kingdom.共同设计罕见病基因检测结果沟通模型:捷克共和国与英国的比较研究
J Community Genet. 2022 Jun;13(3):313-327. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00589-w. Epub 2022 May 6.
2
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers.在孩子被诊断为残疾前后满足家长的需求:对一项由关键工作者提供信息、支持和联络的新项目的评估。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):e477-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0240.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
Using Experience-based Co-design with older patients, their families and staff to improve palliative care experiences in the Emergency Department: A reflective critique on the process and outcomes.与老年患者、其家属及工作人员采用基于经验的协同设计来改善急诊科的姑息治疗体验:对过程与结果的反思性批判
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Mar;68:83-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
8
Using experience-based co-design to improve the pre-treatment care pathway for people diagnosed with head and neck cancer.运用基于经验的共同设计来改善诊断为头颈部癌症患者的治疗前护理途径。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Feb;28(2):739-745. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04877-z. Epub 2019 May 28.
9
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence of inequities experienced by the rare disease community with respect to receipt of a diagnosis and access to services: a scoping review of UK and international evidence.罕见病群体在获得诊断和服务方面所经历的不平等证据:对英国及国际证据的范围审查
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Jun 12;20(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03818-w.
2
"I am not a number!" Opinions and preferences of people with intellectual disability about genetic healthcare.“我不是一个数字!”智障人士对基因健康护理的意见和偏好。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Sep;31(9):1057-1065. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01282-3. Epub 2023 Jan 20.

本文引用的文献

1
100,000 Genomes Pilot on Rare-Disease Diagnosis in Health Care - Preliminary Report.10 万基因组计划在医疗保健中的罕见病诊断 - 初步报告。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 11;385(20):1868-1880. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035790.
2
Effectively communicating comprehensive tumor genomic profiling results: Mitigating uncertainty for advanced cancer patients.有效传达全面的肿瘤基因组分析结果:减轻晚期癌症患者的不确定性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Feb;105(2):452-459. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.05.018. Epub 2021 May 14.
3
Advancing genomic translation: Investigations in communication. A special series on communication research in the context of genomic medicine.
推进基因组学转化:沟通方面的研究。基因组医学背景下沟通研究的特别系列。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 May;104(5):933-934. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.025.
4
The 2019 US medical genetics workforce: a focus on clinical genetics.2019 年美国医学遗传学劳动力:聚焦临床遗传学。
Genet Med. 2021 Aug;23(8):1458-1464. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01162-5. Epub 2021 May 3.
5
"Is that something that should concern me?": a qualitative exploration of parent understanding of their child's genomic test results.“这是我该担心的事吗?”:对父母对其孩子基因组检测结果理解情况的质性探索
HGG Adv. 2021 Apr 8;2(2). doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2021.100027. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
6
Rare disease care pathways in the EU: from odysseys and labyrinths towards highways.欧盟的罕见病护理路径:从漫长旅程和迷宫走向高速公路。
J Community Genet. 2021 Apr;12(2):231-239. doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00520-9. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
7
How are patients with rare diseases and their carers in the UK impacted by the way care is coordinated? An exploratory qualitative interview study.英国罕见病患者及其照护者的护理协调方式会产生怎样的影响?一项探索性定性访谈研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Feb 10;16(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01664-6.
8
Clinical and psychological outcomes of receiving a variant of uncertain significance from multigene panel testing or genomic sequencing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.接受多基因检测或基因组测序的意义未明变异体的临床和心理结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Genet Med. 2021 Jan;23(1):22-33. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-00957-2. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
9
Differences in cancer patients' and clinicians' preferences for disclosure of uncertain genomic tumor testing results.癌症患者与临床医生在对不确定的基因组肿瘤检测结果披露偏好上的差异。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jan;104(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
10
Patient experience of uncertainty in cancer genomics: a systematic review.癌症基因组学不确定性的患者体验:系统评价。
Genet Med. 2020 Sep;22(9):1450-1460. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0829-y. Epub 2020 May 19.