• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受多基因检测或基因组测序的意义未明变异体的临床和心理结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Clinical and psychological outcomes of receiving a variant of uncertain significance from multigene panel testing or genomic sequencing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Mighton Chloe, Shickh Salma, Uleryk Elizabeth, Pechlivanoglou Petros, Bombard Yvonne

机构信息

Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2021 Jan;23(1):22-33. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-00957-2. Epub 2020 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1038/s41436-020-00957-2
PMID:32921787
Abstract

This study systematically reviewed and synthesized the literature on psychological and clinical outcomes of receiving a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) from multigene panel testing or genomic sequencing. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched. Two reviewers screened studies and extracted data. Data were synthesized through meta-analysis and meta-aggregation. The search identified 4539 unique studies and 15 were included in the review. Patients with VUS reported higher genetic test-specific concerns on the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) scale than patients with negative results (mean difference 3.73 [95% CI 0.80 to 6.66] P = 0.0126), and lower than patients with positive results (mean difference -7.01 [95% CI -11.31 to -2.71], P = 0.0014). Patients with VUS and patients with negative results were similarly likely to have a change in their clinical management (OR 1.41 [95% CI 0.90 to 2.21], P = 0.182), and less likely to have a change in management than patients with positive results (OR 0.09 [95% CI 0.05 to 0.19], P < 0.0001). Factors that contributed to how patients responded to their VUS included their interpretation of the result and their health-care provider's counseling and recommendations. Review findings suggest there may be a need for practice guidelines or clinical decision support tools for VUS disclosure and management.

摘要

本研究系统回顾并综合了关于多基因检测或基因组测序中意义未明变异(VUS)的心理和临床结局的文献。检索了MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库。两名研究者筛选研究并提取数据。通过荟萃分析和元聚合对数据进行综合分析。检索共识别出4539项独特研究,其中15项纳入本综述。与检测结果为阴性的患者相比,携带VUS的患者在癌症风险评估多维影响量表(MICRA)上报告的基因检测相关担忧更高(平均差异3.73 [95%CI 0.80至6.66],P = 0.0126),且低于检测结果为阳性的患者(平均差异 -7.01 [95%CI -11.31至 -2.71],P = 0.0014)。携带VUS的患者和检测结果为阴性的患者在临床管理上发生改变的可能性相似(比值比1.41 [95%CI 0.90至2.21],P = 0.182),且与检测结果为阳性的患者相比,临床管理发生改变的可能性更小(比值比0.09 [95%CI 0.05至0.19],P < 0.0001)。影响患者对VUS反应的因素包括他们对检测结果的解读以及医疗服务提供者的咨询和建议。综述结果表明,可能需要针对VUS披露和管理的实践指南或临床决策支持工具。

相似文献

1
Clinical and psychological outcomes of receiving a variant of uncertain significance from multigene panel testing or genomic sequencing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.接受多基因检测或基因组测序的意义未明变异体的临床和心理结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Genet Med. 2021 Jan;23(1):22-33. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-00957-2. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
2
Psychosocial outcomes following germline multigene panel testing in an ethnically and economically diverse cohort of patients.种系多基因panel 检测后在一个具有种族和经济多样性的患者队列中的心理社会结果。
Cancer. 2021 Apr 15;127(8):1275-1285. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33357. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
3
Impact of Multigene Panel Testing on Surgical Decision Making in Breast Cancer Patients.多基因面板检测对乳腺癌患者手术决策的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr;226(4):560-565. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.037. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
4
Clinical Management of Patients at Risk for Hereditary Breast Cancer with Variants of Uncertain Significance in the Era of Multigene Panel Testing.在多基因 panel 检测时代具有不确定意义的变异的遗传性乳腺癌风险患者的临床管理。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(10):3389-3396. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07595-2. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
5
Understanding variants of uncertain significance in the era of multigene panels: Through the eyes of the patient.在多基因检测时代理解意义未明的变异:从患者的视角出发。
J Genet Couns. 2019 Aug;28(4):878-886. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1130. Epub 2019 May 3.
6
Clinical Utility of Reinterpreting Previously Reported Genomic Epilepsy Test Results for Pediatric Patients.重新解读先前报告的儿科患者基因组癫痫检测结果的临床实用性。
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Jan 1;173(1):e182302. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2302. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
7
The role of a multidisciplinary team in managing variants of uncertain clinical significance in prenatal genetic diagnosis.多学科团队在管理产前遗传诊断中不确定临床意义的变异体中的作用。
Eur J Med Genet. 2023 Oct;66(10):104844. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2023.104844. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
8
Prevalence of pathogenic variants and variants of unknown significance in patients at high risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of gene-panel data.高乳腺癌风险患者中致病性变异体和意义不明变异体的流行率:基因-panel 数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2018 Dec;132:138-144. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
9
The landscape of reported VUS in multi-gene panel and genomic testing: Time for a change.多基因panel 及基因组检测中报告的 VUS 景观:是时候改变了。
Genet Med. 2023 Dec;25(12):100947. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100947. Epub 2023 Jul 30.
10
Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer using the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines.采用 ACMG/AMP 2015 指南重新解读遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌患者中意义未明的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变异。
Breast Cancer. 2019 Jul;26(4):510-519. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-00951-w. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic architecture of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in individuals of Chinese and United Kingdom ancestry.中国和英国血统个体肥厚型心肌病的遗传结构。
Precis Clin Med. 2025 Jul 24;8(3):pbaf019. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbaf019. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Genetic risk in telomere biology disorders: it adds up.端粒生物学障碍中的遗传风险:累积而成。
J Clin Invest. 2025 Aug 15;135(16). doi: 10.1172/JCI195921.
3
Role of Genetics in Early-Onset Cardiovascular Disease.遗传学在早发性心血管疾病中的作用。

本文引用的文献

1
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 1.2020.NCCN 指南解读:遗传/家族性高风险评估:乳腺、卵巢和胰腺,第 1.2020 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Apr;18(4):380-391. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0017.
2
Psychological outcomes related to exome and genome sequencing result disclosure: a meta-analysis of seven Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium studies.外显子组和基因组测序结果披露相关的心理结果:七项临床测序探索性研究(CSER)联盟研究的荟萃分析。
Genet Med. 2019 Dec;21(12):2781-2790. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0565-3. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
3
Cureus. 2025 Jun 14;17(6):e85988. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85988. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Clinical Predictors of Inherited Breast Cancer at a Comprehensive Cancer Centre in Oman:阿曼一家综合癌症中心遗传性乳腺癌的临床预测因素:
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2025 May 2;25(1):341-348. doi: 10.18295/2075-0528.2843.
5
Incidental findings related to genes associated to HAE-nC1INH: how to proceed?与遗传性血管性水肿 - C1酯酶抑制剂缺乏症(HAE - nC1INH)相关基因的偶然发现:如何应对?
Front Immunol. 2025 Jun 17;16:1605727. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1605727. eCollection 2025.
6
Developing the MyCancerGene Digital Health Portal to Improve Patients' Understanding of Germline Cancer Genetic Test Results: Development, User, and Usability Testing Study.开发MyCancerGene数字健康门户网站以提高患者对遗传性癌症基因检测结果的理解:开发、用户及可用性测试研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 May 14;9:e56282. doi: 10.2196/56282.
7
The Time Lag Associated With the Reclassification of Germline BRCA Variants' Pathogenicity Is Critical for Cancer Patients.种系BRCA基因变异致病性重新分类相关的时间滞后对癌症患者至关重要。
Cancer Sci. 2025 Sep;116(9):2613-2615. doi: 10.1111/cas.70040. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
8
Considerations for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome molecular diagnosis: experience from the clinical practice.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌综合征分子诊断的考量:临床实践经验
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Apr;210(3):507-519. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07643-4. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
9
Parental knowledge, attitudes, satisfaction and decisional conflict regarding whole genome sequencing in the Genomic Medicine Service: a multisite survey study in England.基因组医学服务中父母对全基因组测序的认知、态度、满意度及决策冲突:英国的一项多中心调查研究
J Med Genet. 2025 Mar 20;62(4):289-297. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2024-110458.
10
Joint analysis of germline genetic data from over 29,000 cases with suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) as part of the NASGE initiative.作为NASGE计划的一部分,对超过29000例疑似遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌(HBOC)病例的种系遗传数据进行联合分析。
Breast. 2025 Apr;80:103887. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.103887. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
Variant classification changes over time in BRCA1 and BRCA2.
BRCA1 和 BRCA2 中的变异分类随时间变化。
Genet Med. 2019 Oct;21(10):2248-2254. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0493-2. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
4
The Feelings About genomiC Testing Results (FACToR) Questionnaire: Development and Preliminary Validation.基因组检测结果感受(FACToR)问卷:编制与初步验证
J Genet Couns. 2019 Apr;28(2):477-490. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0286-9. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
5
The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research Results.遗传和基因组研究结果重新解释后联系研究参与者的责任。
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Apr 4;104(4):578-595. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.02.025.
6
Patient re-contact after revision of genomic test results: points to consider-a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).基因组检测结果修订后的患者重新联系:需考虑的要点——美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)声明
Genet Med. 2019 Apr;21(4):769-771. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0391-z. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
7
Recontacting clinical genetics patients with reclassified results: equity and policy challenges.向临床遗传学患者重新传达重新分类的结果:公平性与政策挑战
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Apr;27(4):505-506. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0313-1.
8
Uncertainty related to multigene panel testing for cancer: a qualitative study on counsellors' and counselees' views.癌症多基因检测相关的不确定性:关于咨询师和咨询对象观点的定性研究
J Community Genet. 2019 Apr;10(2):303-312. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-0393-1. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
9
Adherence of meta-aggregative systematic reviews to reporting standards and methodological guidance: a methodological review protocol.元聚合系统评价对报告标准和方法学指南的遵循情况:一项方法学综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Apr;17(4):444-450. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003550.
10
"Possibly positive or certainly uncertain?": participants' responses to uncertain diagnostic results from exome sequencing.“可能阳性还是肯定不确定?”:参与者对外显子组测序不确定诊断结果的反应。
Genet Med. 2018 Mar;20(3):313-319. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.135. Epub 2017 Oct 2.