Violet Vines Marshman Research Centre, Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 May 6;22(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00621-9.
Workplace violence by patients and bystanders against health care workers, is a major problem, for workers, organizations, patients, and society. It is estimated to affect up to 95% of health care workers. Emergency health care workers experience very high levels of workplace violence, with one study finding that paramedics had nearly triple the odds of experiencing physical and verbal violence. Many interventions have been developed, ranging from zero-tolerance approaches to engaging with the violent perpetrator. Unfortunately, as a recent Cochrane review showed, there is no evidence that any of these interventions work in reducing or minimizing violence. To design better interventions to prevent and minimize workplace violence, more information is needed on those strategies emergency health care workers currently use to prevent or minimize violence. The objective of the study was to identify and discuss strategies used by prehospital emergency health care workers, in response to violence and aggression from patients and bystanders. Mapping the strategies used and their perceived usefulness will inform the development of tailored interventions to reduce the risk of serious harm to health care workers. In this study the following research questions were addressed: (1) What strategies do prehospital emergency health care workers utilize against workplace violence from patients or bystanders? (2) What is their experience with these strategies?
Five focus groups with paramedics and dispatchers were held at different urban and rural locations in Canada. The focus group responses were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis.
It became apparent that emergency healthcare workers use a variety of strategies when dealing with violent patients or bystanders. Most strategies, other than generic de-escalation techniques, reflect a reliance on the systems the workers work with and within.
The study results support the move away from focusing on the individual worker, who is the victim, to a systems-based approach to help reduce and minimize violence against health care workers. For this to be effective, system-based strategies need to be implemented and supported in healthcare organizations and legitimized through professional bodies, unions, public policies, and regulations.
患者和旁观者对医护人员的工作场所暴力是一个主要问题,对工作人员、组织、患者和社会都有影响。据估计,高达 95%的医护人员会受到影响。急救医护人员经历着非常高程度的工作场所暴力,有一项研究发现,护理人员遭受身体和言语暴力的可能性几乎是三倍。已经开发了许多干预措施,从零容忍方法到与暴力肇事者接触。不幸的是,正如最近的 Cochrane 综述所示,没有证据表明这些干预措施中的任何一种在减少或最小化暴力方面有效。为了设计更好的干预措施来预防和最小化工作场所暴力,需要更多关于急救医护人员目前用于预防或最小化暴力的策略的信息。该研究的目的是确定和讨论院前急救医护人员在应对患者和旁观者的暴力和攻击时使用的策略。对使用的策略及其感知有用性进行映射,将为制定减少医护人员遭受严重伤害风险的针对性干预措施提供信息。在这项研究中,提出了以下研究问题:(1) 院前急救医护人员针对来自患者或旁观者的工作场所暴力使用了哪些策略?(2) 他们对这些策略的经验是什么?
在加拿大不同的城市和农村地区举行了五次护理人员和调度员的焦点小组会议。将焦点小组的回应逐字转录,并使用主题分析进行分析。
很明显,急救医护人员在处理暴力患者或旁观者时会使用各种策略。除了一般的降级技术外,大多数策略都反映了对他们所工作的系统的依赖。
研究结果支持从关注作为受害者的个体工作人员转向基于系统的方法,以帮助减少和最小化医护人员的暴力行为。为了使这一方法有效,需要在医疗保健组织中实施和支持基于系统的策略,并通过专业机构、工会、公共政策和法规使其合法化。