Author Affiliations: University of Florida, College of Nursing (Dr Bumbach), Gainesville; University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing (Dr Culross), Omaha; University of Florida, College of Public Health and Health Professions (Dr Datta), Gainesville.
Comput Inform Nurs. 2022 Sep 1;40(9):615-623. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000916.
To stimulate classroom discussion and collaboration amid the COVID-19 pandemic, increasingly creative pedological methods for nursing education are necessary. Traditionally, high-fidelity simulation has been the standard for nursing education, but the use of virtual reality simulation is increasing. One of the major evaluative measures of simulation clinical training is the cost associated with each modality. In this retrospective case analysis, budget impact analysis methods were employed to compare high-fidelity simulation with virtual reality simulation. The components of each simulation pedagogy were compared in categorized cost buckets. Overall, virtual reality simulation education was determined to require 22% less time than high-fidelity simulation education. The cost associated with the virtual reality simulation was found to be 40% less expensive than the high-fidelity simulation. Our results demonstrate that virtual reality simulation is a financially advantageous, resource conscious pedagogical option for nursing education.
为了在 COVID-19 大流行期间激发课堂讨论和协作,护理教育需要越来越有创意的教学方法。传统上,高保真模拟一直是护理教育的标准,但虚拟现实模拟的使用正在增加。模拟临床培训的主要评估措施之一是与每种模式相关的成本。在这项回顾性案例分析中,采用预算影响分析方法将高保真模拟与虚拟现实模拟进行比较。将每种模拟教学法的组成部分按分类成本进行比较。总体而言,虚拟现实模拟教育所需的时间比高保真模拟教育少 22%。发现虚拟现实模拟的成本比高保真模拟便宜 40%。我们的结果表明,虚拟现实模拟是一种具有成本效益、注重资源的护理教育教学选择。