From the Division of Allergy and Immunology, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Division of Biostatistics, Department of Preventative Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; and.
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2022 May 1;43(3):226-233. doi: 10.2500/aap.2022.43.220021.
Peanut component tests (PCT) have become important in the evaluation of peanut allergy. There remains a paucity of research across the United States in investigating the utility of PCT in clinical practice in conjunction with current standards of care. The primary aims were to evaluate the performance and sensitization patterns of PCT in clinical practice when first available at our institution. We performed a retrospective chart review of 184 children with PCT and oral food challenge (OFC) results between 2012 and 2017. Simple logistic regression models assessed the associations between PCT and OFC outcomes. Receiver operator characteristic curves were constructed, and a predicted probability curve was derived for Ara h2. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age at OFC was 4 years (2-7 years), and 111 patients (60%) were boys. Ara h 2 was the most commonly sensitized PCT. Sixty-one patients (33%) reacted at OFC. Ara h 2 specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) ≥ 0.35 kU/L was associated with increased odds of reacting at OFC (odds ratio 5.91 95% confidence interval, 2.93-11.89; < 0.001); however, 19 patients (37%) positive for Ara h 2 did not react. Ara h 2 sIgE of 0.49 kU/L and 4.58 kU/L were associated with 50% and 90% probability, respectively, of reacting at OFC. Among those sensitized only to Ara h 8 or 9 ( = 21), 86% had no reaction. There was no statistically significant association with polysensitization to Ara h 1, 2, and 3, and peanut OFC outcome. Although the Ara h 2 sIgE value was associated with clinical reactivity, a significant proportion of the patients sensitized to Ara h 2 tolerated peanut. OFC remains an important tool in the evaluation of peanut allergy.
花生成分测试(PCT)在评估花生过敏方面变得非常重要。在美国,针对 PCT 在临床实践中的应用结合现行护理标准的研究相对较少。主要目的是评估我们机构首次提供 PCT 时其在临床实践中的性能和致敏模式。我们对 2012 年至 2017 年间进行的 184 例 PCT 和口服食物挑战(OFC)结果的儿童进行了回顾性图表审查。简单的逻辑回归模型评估了 PCT 与 OFC 结果之间的关联。构建了受试者工作特征曲线,并为 Ara h2 绘制了预测概率曲线。OFC 的中位(四分位距[IQR])年龄为 4 岁(2-7 岁),111 例患者(60%)为男性。Ara h2 是最常见的致敏 PCT。61 例患者(33%)在 OFC 中出现反应。Ara h2 特异性免疫球蛋白 E(sIgE)≥0.35 kU/L 与 OFC 反应的几率增加相关(比值比 5.91,95%置信区间,2.93-11.89;<0.001);然而,19 例(37%)Ara h2 阳性的患者未出现反应。Ara h2 sIgE 为 0.49 kU/L 和 4.58 kU/L 时,分别与 OFC 反应的概率为 50%和 90%相关。在仅对 Ara h8 或 9 致敏的患者中(=21),86%无反应。与对 Ara h1、2 和 3 多致敏以及花生 OFC 结果之间没有统计学意义的关联。尽管 Ara h2 sIgE 值与临床反应性相关,但相当一部分对 Ara h2 致敏的患者可以耐受花生。OFC 仍然是评估花生过敏的重要工具。