Shawaqfeh Bara'a, Hughes Carmel M, McGuinness Bernadette, Barry Heather E
School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;37(6). doi: 10.1002/gps.5722.
This systematic review aimed to assess the types and effectiveness of interventions that sought to reduce anticholinergic burden (ACB) in people with dementia (PwD) in primary care.
One trial registry and eight electronic databases were systematically searched to identify eligible English language studies from inception until December 2021. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to be randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or non-randomised studies (NRS), including controlled before-and-after studies and interrupted time-series studies, of interventions to reduce ACB in PwD aged ≥65 years (either community-dwelling or care home residents). All outcomes were to be considered. Quality was to be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for RCTs and ROBINS-I tool for NRS. If data could not be pooled for meta-analysis, a narrative synthesis was to be conducted.
In total, 1880 records were found, with 1594 records remaining after removal of duplicates. Following title/abstract screening, 13 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. None of these studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. Reasons for exclusion were incorrect study design, ineligible study population, lack of focus on reducing ACB, and studies conducted outside the primary care setting.
This 'empty' systematic review highlights the lack of interventions to reduce ACB in PwD within primary care, despite this being highlighted as a priority area for research in recent clinical guidance. Future research should focus on development and testing of interventions to reduce ACB in this patient population through high-quality clinical trials.
本系统评价旨在评估在初级保健中旨在减轻痴呆症患者抗胆碱能负担(ACB)的干预措施的类型和效果。
系统检索了一个试验注册库和八个电子数据库,以识别从数据库建立至2021年12月符合条件的英文研究。要符合纳入标准,研究必须是随机对照试验(RCT)或非随机研究(NRS),包括前后对照研究和中断时间序列研究,针对年龄≥65岁的痴呆症患者(社区居住者或养老院居民)进行的减轻ACB的干预措施。所有结局均需考虑。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估RCT的质量,使用ROBINS-I工具评估NRS的质量。如果数据无法合并进行荟萃分析,则进行叙述性综合分析。
共找到1880条记录,去除重复记录后还剩1594条记录。经过标题/摘要筛选,对13篇全文文章进行了资格评估。这些研究均未符合本评价的纳入标准。排除原因包括研究设计不正确、研究人群不符合条件、未专注于减轻ACB以及在初级保健环境之外进行的研究。
这项“无内容”的系统评价凸显了初级保健中缺乏减轻痴呆症患者ACB的干预措施,尽管这在近期临床指南中被列为优先研究领域。未来的研究应侧重于通过高质量临床试验开发和测试针对该患者群体减轻ACB的干预措施。