Universitat de les Illes Balears, Department of Biology, INAGEA, Carretera de Valldemossa Km 7.5, 07122, Palma de Mallorca, Illes Balears, Spain.
Universidad de La Laguna, Department of Botany, Ecology and Plant Physiology, Av. Astrofísico Francisco Sánchez, S/N, 38200 La Laguna, Canary Islands, Spain.
J Exp Bot. 2022 Jul 16;73(13):4592-4604. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac189.
Bryophytes are the group of land plants with the lowest photosynthetic rates, which was considered to be a consequence of their higher anatomical CO2 diffusional limitation compared with tracheophytes. However, the most recent studies assessing limitations due to biochemistry and mesophyll conductance in bryophytes reveal discrepancies based on the methodology used. In this study, we compared data calculated from two different methodologies for estimating mesophyll conductance: variable J and the curve-fitting method. Although correlated, mesophyll conductance estimated by the curve-fitting method was on average 4-fold higher than the conductance obtained by the variable J method; a large enough difference to account for the scale of differences previously shown between the biochemical and diffusional limitations to photosynthesis. Biochemical limitations were predominant when the curve-fitting method was used. We also demonstrated that variations in bryophyte relative water content during measurements can also introduce errors in the estimation of mesophyll conductance, especially for samples which are overly desiccated. Furthermore, total chlorophyll concentration and soluble proteins were significantly lower in bryophytes than in tracheophytes, and the percentage of proteins quantified as Rubisco was also significantly lower in bryophytes (<6.3% in all studied species) than in angiosperms (>16% in all non-stressed cases). Photosynthetic rates normalized by Rubisco were not significantly different between bryophytes and angiosperms. Our data suggest that the biochemical limitation to photosynthesis in bryophytes is more relevant than so far assumed.
苔藓植物是光合速率最低的陆生植物群体,这被认为是由于与维管植物相比,它们的解剖结构 CO2 扩散限制更高所致。然而,最近评估苔藓植物中由于生物化学和叶肉导度引起的限制的研究基于所使用的方法存在差异。在这项研究中,我们比较了两种不同方法估算叶肉导度的数据:变量 J 和曲线拟合方法。尽管相关,但通过曲线拟合方法估算的叶肉导度平均比通过变量 J 方法获得的导度高 4 倍;这种差异足够大,可以解释之前在生物化学和扩散限制对光合作用之间显示的差异规模。当使用曲线拟合方法时,生物化学限制占主导地位。我们还表明,在测量过程中苔藓植物的相对含水量的变化也会导致叶肉导度的估算误差,尤其是对于过度干燥的样本。此外,苔藓植物的总叶绿素浓度和可溶性蛋白质明显低于维管植物,并且在苔藓植物中作为 Rubisco 定量的蛋白质百分比也明显低于被子植物(所有非胁迫情况下均大于 16%)(所有研究物种中均小于 6.3%)。Rubisco 归一化的光合速率在苔藓植物和被子植物之间没有显著差异。我们的数据表明,苔藓植物光合作用的生物化学限制比目前假设的更为重要。