• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解语言和阅读理解困难学生的阅读困难的性质和严重程度。

Understanding the nature and severity of reading difficulties among students with language and reading comprehension difficulties.

机构信息

Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk, Department of Special Education, College of Education SZB 228, The University of Texas at Austin, 1912 Speedway, Austin, TX, D4900, USA.

Department of Communicative Disorders and Deaf Education, Utah State University, Logan, USA.

出版信息

Ann Dyslexia. 2022 Jul;72(2):249-275. doi: 10.1007/s11881-022-00255-3. Epub 2022 May 7.

DOI:10.1007/s11881-022-00255-3
PMID:35524931
Abstract

This study investigated the presence of word reading difficulties in a sample of students in Grades 1-4 (n = 357) identified with language and reading comprehension difficulties. This study also examined whether distinct word reading and listening comprehension profiles emerged within this sample and the extent to which these groups varied in performance on cognitive and demographic variables. Findings showed that the majority of students (51%) with language and reading comprehension difficulties demonstrated significant risk in word reading (more than 1 SD below the mean), even though the participant screening procedures did not examine word reading directly. Three latent profiles emerged when students were classified into subgroups based on their performance in listening comprehension (LC) and word reading (WR): (1) severe difficulties in LC and moderate difficulties in WR (11%), (2) mild difficulties in both LC and WR (50%), and (3) moderate difficulties in LC and mild difficulties in WR (39%). Of note, even though students were identified for participation on the basis of poor oral language and reading comprehension abilities, all profiles demonstrated some degree of word reading difficulties. Findings revealed there were differences in age and performance on measures of working memory, nonverbal reasoning, and reading comprehension performance between profiles. Implications for educators providing instruction to students with or at risk for dyslexia and developmental language disorders were discussed.

摘要

本研究调查了在一个 1-4 年级(n=357)被确定有语言和阅读理解困难的学生样本中,是否存在单词阅读困难。本研究还探讨了在这个样本中是否出现了不同的单词阅读和听力理解能力的情况,以及这些群体在认知和人口统计学变量上的表现差异程度。研究结果表明,尽管参与者筛选程序没有直接检查单词阅读,但大多数(51%)有语言和阅读理解困难的学生在单词阅读方面表现出显著的风险(低于平均值 1 个标准差以上)。当根据学生在听力理解(LC)和单词阅读(WR)方面的表现将他们分为亚组时,出现了三个潜在的特征:(1)LC 严重困难,WR 中度困难(11%);(2)LC 和 WR 轻度困难(50%);(3)LC 中度困难,WR 轻度困难(39%)。值得注意的是,尽管学生是基于口语语言和阅读理解能力差而被确定参加研究,但所有特征都表现出一定程度的单词阅读困难。研究结果表明,在年龄和工作记忆、非言语推理以及阅读理解表现方面,各特征之间存在差异。本文讨论了为有阅读障碍和发展性语言障碍风险的学生提供教学的教育工作者的相关启示。

相似文献

1
Understanding the nature and severity of reading difficulties among students with language and reading comprehension difficulties.了解语言和阅读理解困难学生的阅读困难的性质和严重程度。
Ann Dyslexia. 2022 Jul;72(2):249-275. doi: 10.1007/s11881-022-00255-3. Epub 2022 May 7.
2
Examining the Reading and Cognitive Profiles of Students With Significant Reading Comprehension Difficulties.考察有显著阅读理解困难学生的阅读和认知概况。
Learn Disabil Q. 2021 Aug;44(3):183-196. doi: 10.1177/0731948721989973. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
3
The relationship between different measures of oral reading fluency and reading comprehension in second-grade students who evidence different oral reading fluency difficulties.不同阅读流畅度测量指标与具有不同阅读流畅度困难的二年级学生阅读理解之间的关系。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2010 Jul;41(3):340-8. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0093). Epub 2010 Apr 26.
4
The summary writing performance of bilingual learners with reading difficulties.阅读困难双语学习者的摘要写作表现。
Ann Dyslexia. 2023 Apr;73(1):109-129. doi: 10.1007/s11881-022-00258-0. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
5
Reading profiles in secondary school: concurrent language and cognitive abilities, and retrospective and prospective reading skills.中学阅读概况:并发语言和认知能力,以及回顾性和前瞻性阅读技能。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 19;14:1287134. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1287134. eCollection 2023.
6
A comparison of the language skills of ELLs and monolinguals who are poor decoders, poor comprehenders, or normal readers.比较语言技能:英语语言学习者和以英语为母语者在解码能力差、理解能力差和正常读者方面的差异。
J Learn Disabil. 2013 Sep-Oct;46(5):387-401. doi: 10.1177/0022219412466651. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
7
The Critical Role of Word Reading as a Predictor of Response to Intervention.阅读能力对干预反应的关键作用。
J Learn Disabil. 2020 Nov/Dec;53(6):415-427. doi: 10.1177/0022219419891412. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
8
A Longitudinal Analysis of the Trajectories and Predictors of Word Reading and Reading Comprehension Development Among At-Risk Readers.高危阅读者的单词阅读和阅读理解发展轨迹及其预测因素的纵向分析。
J Learn Disabil. 2019 May/Jun;52(3):195-208. doi: 10.1177/0022219418809080. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
9
Reading comprehension difficulties in children with rolandic epilepsy.儿童罗兰多癫痫的阅读理解困难。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018 Mar;60(3):275-282. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13628. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
10
Impacts of cognitive flexibility on central word identification: evidence from poor comprehenders' discourse comprehension of first graders with ADHD.认知灵活性对中心词识别的影响:来自 ADHD 一年级学生语篇理解困难的阅读理解者的证据。
Ann Dyslexia. 2023 Jul;73(2):314-335. doi: 10.1007/s11881-023-00280-w. Epub 2023 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Linguistic and Cognitive Abilities in Children with Dyslexia: A Comparative Analysis.阅读障碍儿童的语言和认知能力:一项比较分析
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Mar 18;15(3):37. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15030037.
2
Latent profiles as predictors of response to instruction for students with reading difficulties.潜在特征作为阅读困难学生对教学反应的预测指标
J Educ Psychol. 2024 Apr;116(3):363-376. doi: 10.1037/edu0000832. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
3
Spatiotemporal Eye-Tracking Feature Set for Improved Recognition of Dyslexic Reading Patterns in Children.
用于提高儿童阅读障碍识别的时空眼动特征集。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 29;22(13):4900. doi: 10.3390/s22134900.