University of Toronto Mississauga, Department of Psychology, Canada.
University of Guelph, Industrial Organizational Psychology, Canada.
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2022 Aug;142:105789. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105789. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
Errors in lethal force by police are met with significant demand for explanations as to why they occur, stimulating a growing body of multidisciplinary research. Acutely stressful occupational conditions result in decrements to police performance, including lethal force decision-making. Further, although it is known that repeated and prolonged exposure to potentially traumatic work-related encounters is linked to higher rates of mental health symptoms, it is unclear if psychological symptoms are related to police performance, and lethal force errors specifically. The present study tested the relationships between biological stress and psychological symptoms on lethal force errors among a combined sample of non-clinical, active-duty frontline (n = 57) and tactical (n = 44) police officers. Specifically, biological measures included: diurnal (cortisol awakening response - CAR), and reactive cortisol (prior to and in response to realistic critical incident (CI) simulations). Psychological self-reported symptoms included: pre-CI stress, depression, anxiety, PTSD, and occupational stress. Tactical officers displayed higher CAR compared to frontline officers, consistent with prior research. When including outliers, CAR significantly predicted lethal force decision-making errors; however, the effect does not remain once removing the influence of outlier CAR observations. The current findings suggest that biological measures of reactive cortisol may be too nonspecific to predict lethal force errors during acutely stressful police operations and measures of diurnal cortisol are heavily influenced by outlier values. Non-clinical levels of psychological symptoms (as measured in this study) do not appear to interfere with lethal force decision-making. It remains to be tested if clinically diagnosed disorders would interfere with police performance. Implications for future applied health research are discussed.
警察在使用致命武力时出现错误,会引起公众对错误原因的强烈质疑,这刺激了越来越多的多学科研究。警察面临的职业压力会导致他们的表现下降,包括致命武力决策。此外,虽然已知反复和长期接触潜在创伤性工作相关事件与更高的心理健康症状发生率有关,但尚不清楚心理症状是否与警察表现,特别是致命武力错误有关。本研究在一个由非临床、现役一线(n=57)和战术(n=44)警察组成的综合样本中测试了生物应激和心理症状与致命武力错误之间的关系。具体而言,生物测量包括:日间(皮质醇觉醒反应-CAR)和反应性皮质醇(在现实关键事件(CI)模拟之前和之后)。心理自我报告的症状包括:CI 前压力、抑郁、焦虑、创伤后应激障碍和职业压力。与先前的研究一致,战术人员的 CAR 明显高于一线人员。当包括异常值时,CAR 显著预测了致命武力决策错误;然而,一旦去除异常 CAR 观察值的影响,这种效应就不再存在。目前的研究结果表明,反应性皮质醇的生物测量可能不够具体,无法预测在急性应激的警察行动中使用致命武力的错误,而日间皮质醇的测量受到异常值的影响很大。(在本研究中测量的)非临床水平的心理症状似乎不会干扰致命武力决策。目前还需要测试临床诊断的障碍是否会干扰警察的表现。讨论了对未来应用健康研究的影响。