Suppr超能文献

避孕价值观和偏好:全球系统评价。

Values and preferences for contraception: A global systematic review.

机构信息

Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Contraception and Fertility Care Team, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Genève, Switzerland.

出版信息

Contraception. 2022 Jul;111:3-21. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.04.011. Epub 2022 May 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify and synthesize original research on contraceptive user values, preferences, views, and concerns about specific family planning methods, as well as perspectives from health workers.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a systematic review of global contraceptive user values and preferences. We searched 10 electronic databases for qualitative and quantitative studies published from 2005 to 2020 and extracted data in duplicate using standard forms.

RESULTS

Overall, 423 original research articles from 93 countries among various groups of end-users and health workers in all 6 World Health Organization regions and all 4 World Bank income classification categories met inclusion criteria. Of these, 250 (59%) articles were from high-income countries, mostly from the United States of America (n = 139), the United Kingdom (n = 29), and Australia (n = 23). Quantitative methods were used in 269 articles, most often cross-sectional surveys (n = 190). Qualitative interviews were used in 116 articles and focus group discussions in 69 articles. The most commonly reported themes included side effects, effectiveness, and ease/frequency/duration of use. Interference in sex and partner relations, menstrual effects, reversibility, counseling/interactions with health workers, cost/availability, autonomy, and discreet use were also important. Users generally reported satisfaction with (and more accurate knowledge about) the methods they were using.

CONCLUSIONS

Contraceptive users have diverse values and preferences, although there is consistency in core themes across settings. Despite the large body of literature identified and relevance to person-centered care, varied reporting of findings limited robust synthesis and quantification of the review results.

摘要

目的

识别和综合原始研究,了解避孕使用者对特定计划生育方法的价值观、偏好、观点和关注,以及卫生工作者的观点。

研究设计

我们对全球避孕使用者的价值观和偏好进行了系统评价。我们在 10 个电子数据库中搜索了 2005 年至 2020 年发表的定性和定量研究,并使用标准表格重复提取数据。

结果

总体而言,来自全球 6 个世界卫生组织区域和 4 个世界银行收入分类类别的各种最终用户群体和卫生工作者的 93 个国家的 423 篇原始研究文章符合纳入标准。其中,250 篇(59%)文章来自高收入国家,主要来自美国(n=139)、英国(n=29)和澳大利亚(n=23)。269 篇文章使用了定量方法,最常见的是横断面调查(n=190)。116 篇文章使用了定性访谈,69 篇文章使用了焦点小组讨论。最常报道的主题包括副作用、效果以及使用的方便性/频率/持续时间。干扰性生活和伴侣关系、月经影响、可逆性、与卫生工作者的咨询/互动、成本/可获得性、自主性和谨慎使用也很重要。使用者通常对他们正在使用的方法表示满意(并且对方法有更准确的了解)。

结论

避孕使用者有不同的价值观和偏好,尽管在不同的环境下存在核心主题的一致性。尽管确定了大量的文献,并且与以患者为中心的护理相关,但发现结果的报告方式各不相同,限制了对综述结果的稳健综合和量化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ab8/9232836/46fc7ad7f84d/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验