• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量女性的避孕自我效能:土耳其的效度和信度研究。

Measuring contraceptive self-efficacy in women: the Turkish validity and reliability study.

作者信息

Dogan Gangal Aliye, Senturk Erenel Ayten

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Nursing, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.

Faculty of Health Science, Department of Nursing, Lokman Hekim University, Ankara, Türkiye.

出版信息

Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2025 May 6;26:e36. doi: 10.1017/S146342362500026X.

DOI:10.1017/S146342362500026X
PMID:40325868
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12099267/
Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Contraceptive Self-Efficacy in Women in Sub-Saharan Africa (CSESSA) scale.

BACKGROUND

Contraceptive self-efficacy is a crucial predictor of utilization of modern contraceptive methods. However, the existing tools for comprehensively assessing contraceptive self-efficacy are limited. Methods: The sample of this methodological study consisted of 510 female participants of reproductive age. The translation and cultural adaptation of the scale were performed. For validity, content validity and construct validity were tested. For reliability, test-retest reliability, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and item-total score correlations were evaluated. Findings: The goodness-of-fit indices showed an overall acceptable fit with the three-factor model. Cronbach's alpha for the overall CSESSA scale was 0.867, and for the three subscales, it ranged from 0.77 to 0.84. The scale's test-retest reliability was found to be r = 0.83 (p < 0.001), and the item-total correlations score ranged from 0.495 to 0.646. The Turkish version of the scale is a valid and reliable tool to measure the contraceptive self-efficacy of women of reproductive age. This scale can provide a comprehensive understanding of self-efficacy by assessing various dimensions of contraceptive self-efficacy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估《撒哈拉以南非洲女性避孕自我效能感量表》(CSESSA)土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性。

背景

避孕自我效能感是现代避孕方法使用情况的关键预测指标。然而,用于全面评估避孕自我效能感的现有工具有限。方法:本方法学研究的样本包括510名育龄女性参与者。对该量表进行了翻译和文化调适。在有效性方面,测试了内容效度和结构效度。在可靠性方面,评估了重测信度、克朗巴哈α系数以及项目与总分的相关性。结果:拟合优度指数显示与三因素模型总体拟合良好。CSESSA量表总体的克朗巴哈α系数为0.867,三个子量表的克朗巴哈α系数在0.77至0.84之间。该量表的重测信度为r = 0.83(p < 0.001),项目与总分的相关得分在0.495至0.646之间。该量表的土耳其语版本是测量育龄女性避孕自我效能感的有效且可靠的工具。该量表通过评估避孕自我效能感的各个维度,能够提供对自我效能感的全面理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e398/12099267/cac0066b675e/S146342362500026X_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e398/12099267/7c66948fb255/S146342362500026X_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e398/12099267/cac0066b675e/S146342362500026X_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e398/12099267/7c66948fb255/S146342362500026X_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e398/12099267/cac0066b675e/S146342362500026X_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring contraceptive self-efficacy in women: the Turkish validity and reliability study.测量女性的避孕自我效能:土耳其的效度和信度研究。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2025 May 6;26:e36. doi: 10.1017/S146342362500026X.
2
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Contraceptive Use Stigma Scale.《避孕使用耻辱感量表》土耳其语版本的效度与信度
Int J Nurs Pract. 2025 Apr;31(2):e70008. doi: 10.1111/ijn.70008.
3
The 6-Item Self-Efficacy Scale in Chronic Disease Management in Women With Endometriosis: A Turkish Validity and Reliability Study.子宫内膜异位症女性慢性病管理的6项自我效能量表:一项土耳其语的效度和信度研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14282. doi: 10.1111/jep.14282.
4
The validity and reliability of the Stoma Self-Efficacy Scale: A methodological study.造口自我效能感量表的有效性和信度:一项方法学研究。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2020 Dec;26(6):e12840. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12840. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
5
Turkish validity and reliability study of the adolescent asthma self-efficacy questionnaire.青少年哮喘自我效能感问卷的土耳其有效性和可靠性研究。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 Jul-Aug;77:e450-e457. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.05.009. Epub 2024 May 10.
6
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the health belief model scale for colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查健康信念模型量表土耳其语版本的效度与信度
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 22;25(1):1887. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23127-y.
7
Reliability and Validity of a Turkish version of the Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale.土耳其语版产前母乳喂养自我效能量表的信效度
Midwifery. 2018 Sep;64:11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 18.
8
The Turkish version of nursing practice readiness scale: Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation.护理实践准备就绪量表的土耳其语版本:跨文化调适和心理计量评估。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2024 Aug;30(4):e13254. doi: 10.1111/ijn.13254. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
9
Adaptation of the ''Food Allergy Self-Efficacy Scale for Parents''(FASE-P) to Turkish: a validity and reliability study.父母食物过敏自我效能量表(FASE-P)土耳其语适应性研究:有效性和信度研究。
Turk J Pediatr. 2024 Nov 16;66(5):534-543. doi: 10.24953/turkjpediatr.2024.4691.
10
Turkish Adaptation of the Psychometric Properties of the 'Nursing Learning Self-Efficacy Scale' for Nursing Students.《护理学生“护理学习自我效能感量表”心理测量学特性的土耳其语改编版》
Int J Nurs Pract. 2025 Apr;31(2):e70012. doi: 10.1111/ijn.70012.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of a family planning self-efficacy measure with married women in Bihar, India: Findings from the Bihar Integrated Family Planning Survey.印度比哈尔邦已婚妇女计划生育自我效能感测量方法的验证:比哈尔邦综合计划生育调查结果
Contracept X. 2024 Nov 13;6:100113. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2024.100113. eCollection 2024.
2
Effects of a clinic-based reproductive empowerment intervention on proximal outcomes of contraceptive use, self-efficacy, attitudes, and awareness and use of survivor services: a cluster-controlled trial in Nairobi, Kenya.以诊所为基础的生殖权利赋权干预对避孕使用的近期结局、自我效能、态度以及对幸存者服务的认识和使用的影响:肯尼亚内罗毕的一项群组对照试验。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2227371. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2227371.
3
Factors influencing contraception choice and use globally: a synthesis of systematic reviews.全球范围内影响避孕方法选择和使用的因素:系统评价综述。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2022 Oct;27(5):364-372. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2022.2096215. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
4
Reproductive empowerment and contraceptive self-care: a systematic review.生殖自主权与避孕自我保健:一项系统综述
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021;29(2):2090057. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2090057.
5
Values and preferences for contraception: A global systematic review.避孕价值观和偏好:全球系统评价。
Contraception. 2022 Jul;111:3-21. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.04.011. Epub 2022 May 4.
6
Exploring Readiness for Birth Control in Improving Women Health Status: Factors Influencing the Adoption of Modern Contraceptives Methods for Family Planning Practices.探讨通过控制生育改善妇女健康状况的准备情况:影响计划生育实践中现代避孕方法采用的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 12;18(22):11892. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211892.
7
Measuring contraceptive self-efficacy in sub-Saharan Africa: development and validation of the CSESSA scale in Kenya and Nigeria.在撒哈拉以南非洲地区测量避孕自我效能:肯尼亚和尼日利亚CSESSA量表的开发与验证。
Contracept X. 2020 Oct 9;2:100041. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100041. eCollection 2020.
8
Reasons for discontinuation of contraception among women with a current unintended pregnancy in 36 low and middle-income countries.36 个中低收入国家中,当前意外怀孕的女性停止避孕的原因。
Contraception. 2020 Jan;101(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
9
High Self-Efficacy Is Associated with Prescription Contraceptive Use.高自我效能感与避孕药具的使用有关。
Womens Health Issues. 2018 Nov-Dec;28(6):509-513. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
10
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践:入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.