Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Tulare 93274.
Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Tulare 93274; Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis 93274.
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Jul;105(7):6240-6250. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20940. Epub 2022 May 5.
Our objectives were to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a rapid and novel immunochromatography-based mastitis kit that includes 3 independent tests to detect coliforms (Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae), Streptococcus spp., and Staphylococcus aureus. The kit was developed to facilitate diagnostic-based mastitis treatment. Validation of the kit was based on 154 aseptically collected mastitis samples from 2 clinical herds (clinical population) and 120 milk samples from 3 nonclinical herds (nonclinical population) without clinical cases at the time of enrollment. One herd sampled at different times was common to both populations. A 3-test in 2-population Bayesian latent class model with uniform priors for all test parameters except specificity of culture, which was modeled informatively, was used to estimate sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of the test kit, culture, and PCR at the cow level. The mastitis test kit's 96.9% Sp for Streptococcus spp. had a low false positive percentage (3.1%), which, together with the kit's rapid turnaround time for results, makes it a suitable initial screening test that producers can use to identify clinical cows to treat based on Streptococcus spp. mastitis in kit-positive results. Due to the 60.4% kit Se, producers should follow up on Streptococcus spp. kit-negative cows using a confirmatory test such as PCR (Sp of 98.4%) or culture (Sp of 99.6%). In contrast, aerobic culture had Se of 76.5% and Sp of 99.6% for Streptococcus spp. Similarly, the Sp of the kit (98.2%) and culture (99.8%) for Staph. aureus were particularly high, and even though the kit's Se (61.0%) was lower than culture (88.4%; posterior probability of difference 98%), the kit could be beneficial before use of a confirmatory test for kit-negative samples due to its ease and rapid turnaround time. Mostly, quantitative real-time (q)PCR outperformed the kit's Se (37.7%) and Sp (92.9%) for coliforms, as well as the kit's Se (60.4%) for Streptococcus spp. However, qPCR may require more technical skills and turnaround time for final results. Use of the on-farm mastitis test kit evaluated in the present study could enhance sustainable antimicrobial drug use by rapidly identifying Streptococcus mastitis for targeted treatment. Furthermore, the kit may be used in a Staph. aureus outbreak where cows can be rapidly screened to identify cases for segregation or culling during an outbreak and kit-negative cows further confirmed by milk culture or qPCR. However, the cost-effectiveness of such an approach has not been investigated.
我们的目标是评估一种快速且新颖的免疫层析试剂盒的诊断准确性,该试剂盒包括 3 项独立的测试,用于检测大肠埃希氏菌或肺炎克雷伯菌、链球菌属和金黄色葡萄球菌等肠杆菌科。该试剂盒的开发旨在促进基于诊断的乳腺炎治疗。试剂盒的验证基于来自 2 个临床牛群(临床人群)的 154 个无菌采集的乳腺炎样本和来自 3 个非临床牛群(非临床人群)的 120 个无临床病例的牛奶样本。在两个群体中,一个在不同时间采样的牛群是共同的。使用具有所有测试参数的均匀先验(除了培养特异性)的三测试两群体贝叶斯潜在类别模型来估计牛水平测试试剂盒、培养和 PCR 的敏感性 (Se) 和特异性 (Sp)。乳腺炎测试试剂盒对链球菌属的 96.9%特异性具有低假阳性率(3.1%),再加上试剂盒结果的快速周转时间,使其成为生产者可以使用的合适初始筛选测试,以根据链球菌属的乳腺炎来识别临床牛群进行治疗。由于试剂盒的 Se 为 60.4%,因此生产者应使用确认测试(如 PCR(Sp 为 98.4%)或培养(Sp 为 99.6%))来跟进链球菌属试剂盒阴性的牛群。相比之下,需氧培养对链球菌属的 Se 为 76.5%,Sp 为 99.6%。同样,试剂盒(98.2%)和培养(99.8%)对金黄色葡萄球菌的 Sp 特别高,尽管试剂盒的 Se(61.0%)低于培养(88.4%;差异后验概率为 98%),但由于其简便和快速周转时间,在对试剂盒阴性样本使用确认测试之前,试剂盒可能会有所帮助。总的来说,定量实时 (q)PCR 的肠杆菌科的 Se(37.7%)和 Sp(92.9%)优于试剂盒,以及链球菌属的试剂盒 Se(60.4%)。然而,qPCR 可能需要更多的技术技能和最终结果的周转时间。在本研究中评估的农场乳腺炎测试试剂盒的使用可以通过快速识别用于靶向治疗的乳腺炎链球菌属来增强可持续的抗菌药物使用。此外,该试剂盒可用于金黄色葡萄球菌爆发期间,可快速筛选出病例进行隔离或淘汰,并通过牛奶培养或 qPCR 进一步确认试剂盒阴性的牛群。然而,这种方法的成本效益尚未得到调查。