• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏、胸科和结直肠手术中患者参与技术(PET)的成本效益分析。

Cost-benefit analysis of a patient engagement technology (PET) in cardiac, thoracic, and colorectal surgery.

机构信息

Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2022 Sep;224(3):979-986. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.04.030. Epub 2022 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.04.030
PMID:35525626
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient engagement technologies (PETs) guide patients through perioperative care, but little is known about their costs-benefits.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing elective colorectal, cardiac, thoracic surgery 2015-2020. PET was implemented 2018. Patients were propensity-matched in pre-PET, PET, non-PET groups. Costs of surgical encounter and 30 days post-discharge, mortality, length-of-stay, readmissions, complications, satisfaction were compared.

RESULTS

Overall, 4,373 patients underwent surgery and 607 (13.9%) patients enrolled in the PET. PET patients did not have increased costs in any specialty. Colorectal PET patients' variable costs of surgical encounter were $102 lower than non-PET, $1495 lower than pre-PET (p = 0.03). Thoracic PET patients' total costs of surgical encounter were $9224 lower than non-PET, $2187 lower than pre-PET (p = 0.03). Thoracic PET patients had lower mean LOS (2.4 days, 5.1 non-PET, 3.1 pre-PET, p = 0.03). PET patient satisfaction ranged 86.0%-97.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a PET did not increase costs and was associated with benefits for patients undergoing elective surgery.

摘要

背景

患者参与技术(PET)指导患者进行围手术期护理,但对于其成本效益知之甚少。

方法

回顾性队列研究了 2015 年至 2020 年期间接受择期结直肠、心脏、胸外科手术的患者。2018 年实施了 PET。在 PET 前、PET 中、非 PET 组中进行倾向匹配。比较手术和 30 天出院后的成本、死亡率、住院时间、再入院率、并发症、满意度。

结果

总体而言,4373 名患者接受了手术,607 名(13.9%)患者参加了 PET。任何专业的 PET 患者都没有增加成本。结直肠 PET 患者手术费用的变动成本比非 PET 患者低 102 美元,比 PET 前低 1495 美元(p=0.03)。胸科 PET 患者的手术总费用比非 PET 患者低 9224 美元,比 PET 前低 2187 美元(p=0.03)。胸科 PET 患者的平均住院时间较短(2.4 天,5.1 非 PET,3.1 PET 前,p=0.03)。PET 患者的满意度在 86.0%至 97.8%之间。

结论

使用 PET 不会增加成本,并为接受择期手术的患者带来益处。

相似文献

1
Cost-benefit analysis of a patient engagement technology (PET) in cardiac, thoracic, and colorectal surgery.心脏、胸科和结直肠手术中患者参与技术(PET)的成本效益分析。
Am J Surg. 2022 Sep;224(3):979-986. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.04.030. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
2
Can screen-time help? An analysis of usage of patient engagement technology following colorectal surgery.屏幕时间(使用)有用吗?一项分析了结直肠手术后使用患者参与技术的情况。
Am J Surg. 2024 Jul;233:78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.02.015. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
3
Ileostomy Patients Using Patient Engagement Technology Experience Decreased Length of Stay.使用患者参与技术的回肠造口患者的住院时间缩短。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Mar;26(3):635-642. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05158-z. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
4
A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery.开放与腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的临床及经济结局的全国性评估。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4220-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4732-6. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
5
Feasibility and Safety of Ambulatory Surgery as the Next Management Paradigm in Colorectal Resection Surgery.门诊手术作为结直肠切除术的下一个管理模式的可行性和安全性。
Ann Surg. 2022 Sep 1;276(3):562-569. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005561. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
6
Reducing Readmissions While Shortening Length of Stay: The Positive Impact of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol in Colorectal Surgery.在缩短住院时间的同时减少再入院率:强化康复方案在结直肠癌手术中的积极影响。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Feb;60(2):219-227. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000748.
7
The impact of preoperative opioid use on outcomes after elective colorectal surgery: A propensity-matched comparison study.术前阿片类药物使用对择期结直肠手术后结局的影响:一项倾向评分匹配比较研究。
Surgery. 2019 Oct;166(4):632-638. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
8
Standardization of care: impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery.护理标准化:强化康复方案对结直肠手术后住院时间、并发症及直接费用的影响
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Apr;220(4):430-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.042. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
9
Is there an outcome benefit? Patient engagement technology in addition to the electronic medical record patient portal following elective colorectal surgery.是否存在结局获益?择期结直肠手术后,除电子病历患者门户之外的患者参与技术。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9275-9282. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10478-z. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
10
Reducing hospital stay for colorectal surgery in ERAS setting by means of perioperative patient education of expected day of discharge.通过对预期出院日期进行围手术期患者教育,在加速康复外科(ERAS)环境下缩短结直肠手术的住院时间。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Jul;36(7):1535-1542. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03948-0. Epub 2021 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of a mobile health patient engagement technology improves perioperative outcomes in gynecologic oncology patients.移动医疗患者参与技术的使用改善了妇科肿瘤患者的围手术期结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Nov;178:23-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.09.008. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
2
Innovating for Value-Based Surgical Care in Canada: A Post-Pandemic Necessity.为加拿大基于价值的外科护理创新:后疫情时代的必要之举。
Healthc Policy. 2023 May;18(4):43-56. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2023.27094.