• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

是否存在结局获益?择期结直肠手术后,除电子病历患者门户之外的患者参与技术。

Is there an outcome benefit? Patient engagement technology in addition to the electronic medical record patient portal following elective colorectal surgery.

作者信息

Melucci Alexa D, Flodman Kiersten, Loria Anthony, Swanson Holli L, Robinson Mary K, Hasselberg Michael J, Evans Lara, Temple Larissa K, Fleming Fergal J

机构信息

Surgical Health Outcomes and Research Enterprise (SHORE), Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.

Surgical Health Outcomes & Research Enterprise (SHORE), The University of Rochester Medical Center, Saunders Research Building, Suite 124003, 265 Crittenden Blvd, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9275-9282. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10478-z. Epub 2023 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-023-10478-z
PMID:37880445
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient engagement technologies (PET) are an area of growing innovation and investment, but whether PET use in the setting of electronic medical record (EMR) supported patient portals are associated with improved outcomes is unknown. Therefore, we assessed PET and EMR activation among patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery on an enhanced recovery pathway.

METHODS

We identified adults undergoing elective colorectal surgery between 1/2017 and 7/2021. EMR activations were assessed and patients were considered PET users if they used a proprietary PET application. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with PET use and determine whether the level of engagement (percentage of messages read by the patient) was associated with 30-day outcomes.

RESULTS

484 patients (53.5% PET users, 81.6% with an activated EMR patient portal, 30.8% ≥ 70 years of age) were included. PET users were younger, more likely to have their EMR portal activated and had decreased odds of prolonged length of stay [odds ratio (OR) 0.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-0.8]. Among patients ≥ 70 years, PET users had reduced odds of readmissions (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.9) compared to PET non-users. The most engaged PET users had decreased morbidity (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.8) and readmissions (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.8) compared to the least engaged PET users.

CONCLUSION

When controlling for EMR activation, patients who use PET, specifically those with higher levels of engagement or aged ≥ 70, have improved outcomes following elective colorectal surgery. Interventions aimed at increasing the adoption of PET among older adults may be warranted.

摘要

背景

患者参与技术(PET)是一个创新和投资不断增长的领域,但在电子病历(EMR)支持的患者门户环境中使用PET是否与改善预后相关尚不清楚。因此,我们评估了接受择期结直肠手术且采用强化康复路径的患者的PET和EMR激活情况。

方法

我们确定了2017年1月至2021年7月期间接受择期结直肠手术的成年人。评估EMR激活情况,如果患者使用了专有的PET应用程序,则将其视为PET用户。使用多变量逻辑回归来确定与PET使用相关的因素,并确定参与程度(患者阅读消息的百分比)是否与30天预后相关。

结果

纳入484例患者(53.5%为PET用户,81.6%的EMR患者门户已激活,30.8%年龄≥70岁)。PET用户更年轻,EMR门户激活的可能性更大,住院时间延长的几率降低[比值比(OR)0.5,95%置信区间(CI)0.4 - 0.8]。在≥70岁的患者中,与非PET用户相比,PET用户再入院的几率降低(OR 0.2,95% CI 0.1 - 0.9)。与参与程度最低的PET用户相比,参与程度最高的PET用户发病率降低(OR 0.2,95% CI 0.1 - 0.8),再入院率降低(OR 0.3,95% CI 0.1 - 0.8)。

结论

在控制EMR激活的情况下,使用PET的患者,特别是那些参与程度较高或年龄≥70岁的患者,在择期结直肠手术后预后改善。可能有必要采取干预措施以提高老年人对PET的采用率。

相似文献

1
Is there an outcome benefit? Patient engagement technology in addition to the electronic medical record patient portal following elective colorectal surgery.是否存在结局获益?择期结直肠手术后,除电子病历患者门户之外的患者参与技术。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9275-9282. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10478-z. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
2
Patient Portals Facilitating Engagement With Inpatient Electronic Medical Records: A Systematic Review.促进住院电子病历参与度的患者门户:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 11;21(4):e12779. doi: 10.2196/12779.
3
Patient Portal Use, Perceptions of Electronic Health Record Value, and Self-Rated Primary Care Quality Among Older Adults: Cross-sectional Survey.患者门户使用情况、对电子健康记录价值的认知以及老年人对初级保健质量的自我评估:横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 10;23(5):e22549. doi: 10.2196/22549.
4
Cost-benefit analysis of a patient engagement technology (PET) in cardiac, thoracic, and colorectal surgery.心脏、胸科和结直肠手术中患者参与技术(PET)的成本效益分析。
Am J Surg. 2022 Sep;224(3):979-986. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.04.030. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
5
Patient Portals: Who uses them? What features do they use? And do they reduce hospital readmissions?患者门户网站:谁在使用它们?他们使用哪些功能?它们能降低医院再入院率吗?
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Jun 6;7(2):489-501. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-01-RA-0003. eCollection 2016.
6
Dual Use of a Patient Portal and Clinical Video Telehealth by Veterans with Mental Health Diagnoses: Retrospective, Cross-Sectional Analysis.患有精神健康诊断的退伍军人对患者门户网站和临床视频远程医疗的双重使用:回顾性横断面分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 7;20(11):e11350. doi: 10.2196/11350.
7
A retrospective observational study of enhanced recovery after surgery in older patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.择期结直肠手术老年患者术后加速康复的回顾性观察研究。
PLoS One. 2020 May 8;15(5):e0232857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232857. eCollection 2020.
8
Determinants of Use of the Care Information Exchange Portal: Cross-sectional Study.使用护理信息交换门户的决定因素:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 11;23(11):e23481. doi: 10.2196/23481.
9
A Web-Based Patient Portal for Mental Health Care: Benefits Evaluation.用于精神卫生保健的基于网络的患者门户:效益评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 16;18(11):e294. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6483.
10
Impact of Surgical Resident Education and EMR Standardization in Enhancing ERAS Adherence and Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery.手术住院医师教育和电子病历标准化对增强结直肠手术中 ERAS 依从性和结果的影响。
J Surg Educ. 2024 Feb;81(2):257-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.10.010. Epub 2023 Dec 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Disparities in Perioperative Use of Patient Engagement Technologies - Not All Use is Equal.围手术期患者参与技术使用的差异 - 并非所有使用都是平等的。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jan 1;277(1):e218-e225. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004970. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
2
Ileostomy Patients Using Patient Engagement Technology Experience Decreased Length of Stay.使用患者参与技术的回肠造口患者的住院时间缩短。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Mar;26(3):635-642. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05158-z. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
3
Does health literacy impact technological comfort in cancer patients?
健康素养是否会影响癌症患者对技术的舒适度?
Am J Surg. 2022 Apr;223(4):722-728. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.08.006. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
4
Home to Stay: An Integrated Monitoring System Using a Mobile App to Support Patients at Home Following Colorectal Surgery.居家护理:一种使用移动应用程序的综合监测系统,用于在结直肠癌手术后为居家患者提供支持。
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1241-1246. doi: 10.1177/2374373520904194. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
5
Trends in emergency department utilization following common operations in New York State, 2005-2014.纽约州 2005-2014 年常见手术的急诊利用趋势。
Surg Endosc. 2020 May;34(5):1994-1999. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06975-9. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
6
S128: Active post discharge surveillance program as a part of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol decreases emergency department visits and readmissions in colorectal patients.S128:作为强化术后康复方案的一部分,主动出院后监测计划可降低结直肠患者的急诊就诊次数和再入院率。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3816-3827. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06725-x. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
7
A Mobile Health Application to Track Patients After Gastrointestinal Surgery: Results from a Pilot Study.移动医疗应用程序追踪胃肠道手术后的患者:一项试点研究的结果。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Sep;21(9):1500-1505. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3482-2. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
8
Exploring the burden of inpatient readmissions after major cancer surgery.探索重大癌症手术后住院再入院的负担。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 10;33(5):455-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.5938. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
9
Advancing age and 30-day adverse outcomes after nonemergent general surgeries.非紧急普通外科手术后年龄增长与 30 天不良结局。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Sep;61(9):1608-14. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12401. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
10
Readmission rates and cost following colorectal surgery.结直肠手术后的再入院率和费用。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Dec;54(12):1475-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31822ff8f0.