McEwan Troy E, Simmons Melanie, Clothier Taryn, Senkans Svenja
Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology and Forensicare, Alphington, VIC, Australia.
AMEOS Klinikum für Forensische Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Neustadt i. H., Germany.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Jul 28;28(3):435-461. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1787904. eCollection 2021.
Accurate measurement of stalking has proven difficult, partly because stalking is characterised by the cumulative effects of a pattern of behaviour. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a new measure of stalking that overcomes the observed shortcomings of existing tools. The Stalking Assessment Indices (SAI) were created using index development principles and evaluated in 244 Australian undergraduate students ( = 33.7, 77% female). Seventy-three reported stalking victimisation (experiencing at least five intrusions over at least two weeks causing substantial fear or distress), and 51 reported stalking perpetration. Stalking behaviours reported by victims formed a two-component structure, which was also observed in multidimensional scaling analysis. The perpetration index showed good convergent validity with measures of rumination and aggression, and both indices had adequate test-retest reliability over four weeks. These results suggest that the SAI could provide a consistent and inclusive measure of stalking for use across different research settings.
事实证明,准确测量跟踪行为很困难,部分原因是跟踪行为具有行为模式累积效应的特点。本研究旨在开发和评估一种新的跟踪行为测量方法,以克服现有工具所观察到的缺点。跟踪行为评估指数(SAI)是根据指数开发原则创建的,并在244名澳大利亚本科生中进行了评估(平均年龄 = 33.7岁,77%为女性)。73人报告曾是跟踪行为的受害者(在至少两周内经历至少五次侵扰,造成严重恐惧或困扰),51人报告实施过跟踪行为。受害者报告的跟踪行为形成了一个两成分结构,在多维尺度分析中也观察到了这一点。实施指数与沉思和攻击测量方法具有良好的收敛效度,并且两个指数在四周内都具有足够的重测信度。这些结果表明,SAI可以为不同研究环境下的跟踪行为提供一种一致且全面的测量方法。