Suppr超能文献

HCR-20在澳大利亚法医精神病患者样本中的预测效度。

Predictive validity of the HCR-20 in a sample of Australian forensic psychiatric patients.

作者信息

Brookstein Delene M, Daffern Michael, Ogloff James R P, Campbell Rachel E, Chu Chi Meng

机构信息

Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Alphington, VIC, Australia.

Victorian Institute of Forensic Mental Health (Forensicare), Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Jun 16;28(3):325-342. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1775152. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The Historical Clinical Risk Management-20 Version 3 is the latest iteration in the HCR-20 series, adopting novel changes such as the addition of Relevance ratings and non-requirement to include the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. This study aimed to examine these changes and compare the predictive validity of the HCR-20 to the HCR-20. The sample comprised of 100 forensic psychiatric patients, retrospectively followed up for a maximum period of approximately 13 years post-discharge from the Thomas Embling Hospital. Recidivism data were sourced from official police records. Results indicated good to excellent inter-rater reliability. The HCR-20 significantly predicted violent recidivism (area under the curve = .70 to .77), levels of accuracy that were not significantly different from the HCR-20. HCR-20 Relevance ratings failed to add incremental validity above Presence ratings; however, the PCL-R improved upon the HCR-20's validity. The study represented one of the first evaluations of the HCR-20 in Australia.

摘要

《历史临床风险管理-20第三版》是HCR-20系列的最新版本,采用了一些新的变化,如增加了相关性评级,且无需纳入《修订版精神病态量表》。本研究旨在考察这些变化,并比较HCR-20与HCR-20的预测效度。样本包括100名法医精神病患者,对其进行回顾性随访,最长随访期为从托马斯·恩布林医院出院后的约13年。再犯数据来自警方官方记录。结果表明评分者间信度良好至优秀。HCR-20能显著预测暴力再犯(曲线下面积=0.70至0.77),其准确性水平与HCR-20无显著差异。HCR-20相关性评级未能在存在性评级之上增加额外效度;然而,《修订版精神病态量表》提升了HCR-20的效度。该研究是澳大利亚对HCR-20的首批评估之一。

相似文献

1
Predictive validity of the HCR-20 in a sample of Australian forensic psychiatric patients.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Jun 16;28(3):325-342. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1775152. eCollection 2021.
5
Discriminative and predictive validity of risk assessment measures for women incarcerated for serious violent offences in Australia.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2024 Jan 8;31(5):963-985. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2242437. eCollection 2024.
7
Assessing risk for aggression in forensic psychiatric inpatients: An examination of five measures.
Law Hum Behav. 2016 Jun;40(3):233-43. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000179. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
9
Risk assessment of criminal offenders in Ghana: An investigation of the discriminant validity of the HCR-20.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Sep-Oct;66:101458. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101458. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
10
Recidivism in female offenders: PCL-R lifestyle factor and VRAG show predictive validity in a German sample.
Behav Sci Law. 2012 Sep-Oct;30(5):575-84. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2013. Epub 2012 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Discriminative and predictive validity of risk assessment measures for women incarcerated for serious violent offences in Australia.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2024 Jan 8;31(5):963-985. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2242437. eCollection 2024.
2
Predicting violence in female forensic inpatients with substance use disorders - the utility of a gender-responsive assessment.
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 29;15:1346815. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1346815. eCollection 2024.
3
Violence risk assessment instruments in forensic psychiatric populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2023 Oct;10(10):780-789. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00256-0.
4
Validation of a violence risk screening for youth in psychiatric inpatient care-a pilot study of V-RISK-Y.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 26;14:1210871. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1210871. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The assessment of dynamic risk among forensic psychiatric patients transitioning to the community.
Law Hum Behav. 2016 Aug;40(4):374-86. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000183. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
2
Assessing risk for aggression in forensic psychiatric inpatients: An examination of five measures.
Law Hum Behav. 2016 Jun;40(3):233-43. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000179. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
4
Reporting guidance for violence risk assessment predictive validity studies: the RAGEE Statement.
Law Hum Behav. 2015 Feb;39(1):15-22. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000090. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
7
The role of psychopathic personality disorder in violence risk assessments using the HCR-20.
J Pers Disord. 2010 Oct;24(5):551-80. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2010.24.5.551.
8
A large-scale meta-analysis relating the hare measures of psychopathy to antisocial conduct.
Law Hum Behav. 2008 Feb;32(1):28-45. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9096-6. Epub 2007 Jul 13.
9
Youth psychopathy and criminal recidivism: a meta-analysis of the psychopathy checklist measures.
Law Hum Behav. 2007 Feb;31(1):53-75. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9019-y.
10
Psychopathy/antisocial personality disorder conundrum.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006 Jun-Jul;40(6-7):519-28. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01834.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验