Douglas K S, Ogloff J R, Nicholls T L, Grant I
Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Dec;67(6):917-30. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.67.6.917.
This study evaluated the predictive validity of the HCR-20 (Historical, Clinical, and Risk Management) violence risk assessment scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV). Files of 193 civilly committed patients were coded. Patients were followed up in the community for an average of 626 days. Receiver operating characteristic analyses with the HCR-20 yielded strong associations with violence (areas under curve [AUCs] = .76-.80). Persons scoring above the HCR-20 median were 6 to 13 times more likely to be violent than those scoring below the median. PCL:SV AUCs were more variable (.68-.79). Regression analyses revealed that the HCR-20 added incremental validity to the PCL:SV and that only HCR-20 subscales predicted violence. Implications for risk assessment research, and the clinical assessment and management of violence, are discussed.
本研究评估了HCR - 20(历史、临床和风险管理)暴力风险评估方案及《心理变态检查表:筛查版》(PCL:SV)的预测效度。对193名民事收容患者的档案进行了编码。患者在社区中平均随访626天。使用HCR - 20进行的受试者工作特征分析显示与暴力行为有很强的相关性(曲线下面积[AUCs]=.76 -.80)。HCR - 20得分高于中位数的人实施暴力的可能性比得分低于中位数的人高6至13倍。PCL:SV的AUCs更具变异性(.68 -.79)。回归分析表明,HCR - 20为PCL:SV增加了额外的效度,且只有HCR - 20分量表能预测暴力行为。文中讨论了对风险评估研究以及暴力行为的临床评估和管理的启示。