Wright Christopher M, Baron Jonathan, Lee Daniel Y, Kim Michele, Barsky Andrew R, Teo Boon-Keng Kevin, Lukens John N, Swisher-McClure Samuel, Lin Alexander
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Int J Part Ther. 2021 Nov 24;8(4):47-54. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-D-21-00018. eCollection 2022 Spring.
One significant advantage of proton therapy is its ability to improve normal tissue sparing and toxicity mitigation, which is relevant in the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Here, we report our institutional experience and dosimetric results with adjuvant proton radiation therapy (PRT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-associated OPSCC.
This was a retrospective, single institutional study of all patients treated with adjuvant PRT for HPV-associated OPSCC from 2015 to 2019. Each patient had a treatment-approved equivalent IMRT plan to serve as a reference. Endpoints included dosimetric outcomes to the organs at risk (OARs), local regional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Descriptive statistics, a 2-tailed paired test for dosimetric comparisons, and the Kaplan-Meier method for disease outcomes were used.
Fifty-three patients were identified. Doses delivered to OARs compared favorably for PRT versus IMRT, particularly for the pharyngeal constrictors, esophagus, larynx, oral cavity, and submandibular and parotid glands. The achieved normal tissue sparing did not negatively impact disease outcomes, with 2-year LRC, PFS, and OS of 97.0%, 90.3%, and 97.5%, respectively.
Our study suggests that meaningful normal tissue sparing in the postoperative setting is achievable with PRT, without impacting disease outcomes.
质子治疗的一个显著优势在于其能够改善正常组织的保护并减轻毒性,这在口咽鳞状细胞癌(OPSCC)的治疗中具有重要意义。在此,我们报告了我们机构对于人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)相关的OPSCC采用辅助质子放射治疗(PRT)与调强放射治疗(IMRT)的经验及剂量学结果。
这是一项对2015年至2019年间接受HPV相关OPSCC辅助PRT治疗的所有患者进行的回顾性单机构研究。每位患者都有一个经治疗批准的等效IMRT计划作为参考。研究终点包括危及器官(OARs)的剂量学结果、局部区域控制(LRC)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。采用描述性统计、用于剂量学比较的双尾配对检验以及用于疾病结果的Kaplan-Meier方法。
共纳入53例患者。与IMRT相比,PRT对OARs的照射剂量更优,尤其是对咽缩肌、食管、喉、口腔以及下颌下腺和腮腺。所实现的正常组织保护并未对疾病结果产生负面影响,2年LRC、PFS和OS分别为97.0%、90.3%和97.5%。
我们的研究表明,PRT在术后能够实现有意义的正常组织保护,且不影响疾病结果。