Gehrsitz Markus, Saffer Henry, Grossman Michael
University of Strathclyde & IZA.
NBER.
J Public Econ. 2021 Dec;204. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104520. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
We show that tax-induced increases in alcohol prices can lead to substantial substitution and avoidance behavior that limits reductions in alcohol consumption. Causal estimates are derived from a natural experiment in Illinois where spirits and wine taxes were raised sharply and unexpectedly in 2009. Beer taxes were increased by only a trivial amount. We construct representative and consistent measures of alcohol prices and sales from scanner data collected for hundreds of products in thousands of stores across the US. Using several difference-in-differences models, we show that alcohol excise taxes are instantly over-shifted. That is, a $1 tax increase translates into a price increase of up to $1.50. We find evidence suggesting that consumers react by switching to less expensive products. In particular, they increase purchases of beer, thus significantly moderating any tax-induced reductions in total ethanol consumption. Our study highlights the importance of tax-induced substitution, the implications of differential tax increases by beverage group and the impacts on public health of alternative types of tax hikes whose main aims are to increase revenue.
我们表明,税收导致的酒精价格上涨会引发大量的替代和规避行为,从而限制酒精消费的减少。因果估计来自伊利诺伊州的一项自然实验,2009年该州烈酒和葡萄酒税大幅意外上调,啤酒税仅略有增加。我们利用在美国数千家商店收集的数百种产品的扫描仪数据构建了具有代表性且一致的酒精价格和销售指标。使用几种双重差分模型,我们表明酒精消费税会立即过度转嫁。也就是说,税收每增加1美元,价格上涨幅度高达1.50美元。我们发现有证据表明消费者会转而购买价格较低的产品。特别是,他们增加了啤酒的购买量,从而显著缓解了税收导致的总乙醇消费量的任何减少。我们的研究强调了税收诱导替代的重要性、饮料类别间差异化税收增加的影响以及主要旨在增加收入的其他类型税收上调对公众健康的影响。