Moyaho-Bernal María de Los Angeles, Badillo-Estévez Bitia Eunice, Soberanes-de la Fuente Ester Luminosa, González-Torres Maykel, Teutle-Coyotecatl Bernardo, Rubín de Celís-Quintana Gisela Nataly, Carrasco-Gutiérrez Rosendo, Vaillard-Jiménez Esther, Lezama-Flores Gloria
Laboratorio de Biomateriales Odontológicos, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla 72000 Mexico
Departamento de Odontología Pediátrica, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla 72000 Mexico
RSC Adv. 2019 Oct 9;9(55):32197-32204. doi: 10.1039/c9ra04159a. eCollection 2019 Oct 7.
The concept of minimally invasive technique in dentistry emphasizes conservative strategies in the management of caries, which results in less destruction of healthy tooth structure. The use of different techniques seems to interfere in the roughness of dentin and the mechanisms of adhesion with the restorative material. This study characterized the roughness of deciduous dentin surface treated with four minimally invasive techniques using profilometry, atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM); moreover, shear bond strength of Vitremer™ glass ionomer was determined. Samples were divided into four groups: G1_CB carbide bur, G2_PB polymer bur, G3_C Carisolv™, and G4_AA air abrasive. No differences were found between groups before and after treatment in the roughness. Samples treated with a carbide bur presented a smear layer; smart bur surface exhibited the remains of the material; G3_C Carisolv™ showed a rough surface, and air abrasive presented particle traces. Concerning the shear bond strength of Vitremer™ glass ionomer were not found differences after treatment ( > 0.05). It is concluded that roughness showed characteristic patterns derived from the technique used and the shear bond strength is not significantly affected after using any minimally invasive method.
牙科微创技术的概念强调在龋病治疗中采用保守策略,这会减少对健康牙体组织的破坏。不同技术的使用似乎会影响牙本质的粗糙度以及与修复材料的粘结机制。本研究采用轮廓仪、原子力显微镜(AFM)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对用四种微创技术处理的乳牙牙本质表面粗糙度进行了表征;此外,还测定了Vitremer™玻璃离子水门汀的剪切粘结强度。样本分为四组:G1_CB 硬质合金车针组、G2_PB 聚合物车针组、G3_C Carisolv™组和 G4_AA 空气喷砂组。治疗前后各组在粗糙度方面未发现差异。用硬质合金车针处理的样本呈现出一层玷污层;智能车针表面有材料残留;G3_C Carisolv™组显示表面粗糙,空气喷砂呈现出颗粒痕迹。关于Vitremer™玻璃离子水门汀的剪切粘结强度,治疗后未发现差异(>0.05)。得出的结论是,粗糙度呈现出因所用技术而产生的特征模式,并且在使用任何微创方法后,剪切粘结强度均未受到显著影响。
Data Brief. 2019-3-6
Dent Mater. 2019-1-30
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019-1