Saikaew Pipop, Senawongse Pisol, Chowdhury Afm Almas, Sano Hidehiko, Harnirattisai Choltacha
Department of Operative and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Oral Health Science, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Dental Medicine.
Dent Mater J. 2018 Nov 30;37(6):973-980. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2017-349. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of surface roughness and smear layer on the micro-shear bond strength (µSBS) of two self-etching adhesives, Clearfil SE Bond (SE) and Clearfil Tri-S Bond (S3). Flat dentin surfaces were prepared with SiC papers (600-, 180- and 120-grit) and diamond burs (extra fine, medium and coarse). They were further divided into smear-covered and smear-free surfaces and bonded with respective adhesives. µSBS test was performed after water storage at 37ºC for 24 h. Smear layer thickness measurement was evaluated by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Surface roughness was examined by contact stylus profilometer. Smear layer thickness and surface roughness were significantly different among all groups (p<0.05). No difference in µSBS was observed among surface prepared by SiC whereas bur-cut smear layer had negative effect on µSBS, especially for S3. Surface roughness from different surface preparations had no influence on µSBS (p<0.05).
本研究的目的是评估表面粗糙度和玷污层对两种自酸蚀粘结剂Clearfil SE Bond(SE)和Clearfil Tri-S Bond(S3)的微剪切粘结强度(µSBS)的影响。使用碳化硅砂纸(600目、180目和120目)和金刚石车针(极细、中号和粗号)制备平坦的牙本质表面。将其进一步分为有玷污层和无玷污层的表面,并用相应的粘结剂进行粘结。在37℃下水储存24小时后进行µSBS测试。通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估玷污层厚度。用接触式触针轮廓仪检查表面粗糙度。所有组之间的玷污层厚度和表面粗糙度存在显著差异(p<0.05)。碳化硅制备的表面之间µSBS无差异,而车针切割的玷污层对µSBS有负面影响,尤其是对于S3。不同表面制备方法产生的表面粗糙度对µSBS没有影响(p<0.05)。