• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种不同牙龈退缩系统临床疗效的比较评估：一项体内研究

Comparative Evaluation of the Clinical Efficacy of Four Different Gingival Retraction Systems: An In Vivo Study.

作者信息

Madaan Rahul, Paliwal Jyoti, Sharma Vineet, Meena Kamal K, Dadarwal Ashish, Kumar Roshni

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences College of Dental Sciences, Jaipur, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Apr 7;14(4):e23923. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23923. eCollection 2022 Apr.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.23923
PMID:35530916
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9078289/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There are numerous gingival retraction systems available on the market. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of four gingival retraction systems, namely, impregnated retraction cord, gingival retraction capsule, retraction paste, and polyvinyl acetate strips.

METHODS

A total of 20 people were chosen for the study, and 100 specimens were collected. The specimens were classified into five groups based on the materials used for gingival displacement. On the first day, a baseline impression without gingival displacement was made. Afterward, impressions were made with any of the following four gingival retraction systems: impregnated retraction cord (SURE-Cord® Plus; Sure Dent Corporation, Jungwon-gu, South Korea), retraction capsule (3M ESPE astringent retraction paste capsule; 3M Corporation, St. Paul, MN), retraction paste (Traxodent® Hemodent® Paste Retraction System; Premier Dental Co., Plymouth Meeting, PA) and polyvinylacetate strips (Merocel; Merocel Co., Mystic, CT), with a 14-day interval between each system. The amount of gingival displacement was measured using an optical microscope as the distance from the tooth to the gingiva crest in a horizontal plane.

RESULTS

All experimental groups had higher gingival displacement than the control group (P < 0.01). Among the experimental groups, polyvinyl acetate strips had the highest gingival displacement value (541.65 μm), followed by impregnated retraction cord (505.37 μm), retraction capsule (333.57 μm), and retraction paste (230.63 μm).

CONCLUSION

Within the limits of this in vivo study, significant differences in horizontal gingival displacement were discovered among the four evaluated systems. The horizontal displacement requirements of 200 μm were exceeded by all four systems. The maximum value for gingival displacement was found in polyvinyl acetate strips (Merocel), followed by impregnated retraction cord (SURE-Cord), and retraction capsule (3M ESPE), and the lowest value was found in retraction paste (Traxodent).

摘要

引言

市场上有众多牙龈退缩系统。本研究旨在评估四种牙龈退缩系统的临床疗效，即浸渍退缩线、牙龈退缩胶囊、退缩糊剂和聚醋酸乙烯条带。

方法

共选择20人进行研究，收集100个样本。根据用于牙龈移位的材料将样本分为五组。第一天，制作无牙龈移位的基线印模。之后，使用以下四种牙龈退缩系统中的任何一种制作印模：浸渍退缩线（SURE-Cord® Plus；韩国全罗南道顺天市Sure Dent公司）、退缩胶囊（3M ESPE收敛性退缩糊剂胶囊；美国明尼苏达州圣保罗市3M公司）、退缩糊剂（Traxodent® Hemodent® 糊剂退缩系统；美国宾夕法尼亚州普利茅斯会议市Premier Dental公司）和聚醋酸乙烯条带（Merocel；美国康涅狄格州神秘市Merocel公司），每种系统之间间隔14天。使用光学显微镜测量牙龈移位量，即水平平面上从牙齿到牙龈嵴的距离。

结果

所有实验组的牙龈移位均高于对照组（P < 0.01）。在实验组中，聚醋酸乙烯条带的牙龈移位值最高（541.65μm），其次是浸渍退缩线（505.37μm）、退缩胶囊（333.57μm）和退缩糊剂（230.63μm）。

结论

在本体内研究的范围内，在所评估的四种系统中发现水平牙龈移位存在显著差异。所有四种系统均超过了200μm的水平移位要求。牙龈移位的最大值出现在聚醋酸乙烯条带（Merocel）中，其次是浸渍退缩线（SURE-Cord）和退缩胶囊（3M ESPE），最小值出现在退缩糊剂（Traxodent）中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/f3edeb49cabf/cureus-0014-00000023923-i22.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/8ac2f289eaa1/cureus-0014-00000023923-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/c0a7c33d6484/cureus-0014-00000023923-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/dff19ed24090/cureus-0014-00000023923-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/143b781e1ce9/cureus-0014-00000023923-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/0d9f32af4141/cureus-0014-00000023923-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/941685b54482/cureus-0014-00000023923-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/eb971f81c5ce/cureus-0014-00000023923-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/59dfc65344cf/cureus-0014-00000023923-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/40a236d4842d/cureus-0014-00000023923-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/0ce999fb1a1c/cureus-0014-00000023923-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/572da5e23386/cureus-0014-00000023923-i11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/4dc1792b19c8/cureus-0014-00000023923-i12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/cec9101cd6af/cureus-0014-00000023923-i13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/f47a62aa3e12/cureus-0014-00000023923-i14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/440443cab5e7/cureus-0014-00000023923-i15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/e9e0cf7de73c/cureus-0014-00000023923-i16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/facb040b224b/cureus-0014-00000023923-i17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/c606cbd18897/cureus-0014-00000023923-i18.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/b99332cbc83e/cureus-0014-00000023923-i19.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/69f3cd5ac8da/cureus-0014-00000023923-i20.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/fc61ffd23765/cureus-0014-00000023923-i21.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/f3edeb49cabf/cureus-0014-00000023923-i22.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/8ac2f289eaa1/cureus-0014-00000023923-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/c0a7c33d6484/cureus-0014-00000023923-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/dff19ed24090/cureus-0014-00000023923-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/143b781e1ce9/cureus-0014-00000023923-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/0d9f32af4141/cureus-0014-00000023923-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/941685b54482/cureus-0014-00000023923-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/eb971f81c5ce/cureus-0014-00000023923-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/59dfc65344cf/cureus-0014-00000023923-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/40a236d4842d/cureus-0014-00000023923-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/0ce999fb1a1c/cureus-0014-00000023923-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/572da5e23386/cureus-0014-00000023923-i11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/4dc1792b19c8/cureus-0014-00000023923-i12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/cec9101cd6af/cureus-0014-00000023923-i13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/f47a62aa3e12/cureus-0014-00000023923-i14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/440443cab5e7/cureus-0014-00000023923-i15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/e9e0cf7de73c/cureus-0014-00000023923-i16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/facb040b224b/cureus-0014-00000023923-i17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/c606cbd18897/cureus-0014-00000023923-i18.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/b99332cbc83e/cureus-0014-00000023923-i19.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/69f3cd5ac8da/cureus-0014-00000023923-i20.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/fc61ffd23765/cureus-0014-00000023923-i21.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2151/9078289/f3edeb49cabf/cureus-0014-00000023923-i22.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of the Clinical Efficacy of Four Different Gingival Retraction Systems: An In Vivo Study.四种不同牙龈退缩系统临床疗效的比较评估：一项体内研究
Cureus. 2022 Apr 7;14(4):e23923. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23923. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Comparative Evaluation of the Amount of Gingival Displacement Using Three Recent Gingival Retraction Systems - Study.使用三种新型牙龈退缩系统对牙龈移位量的比较评估——研究
Contemp Clin Dent. 2020 Jan-Mar;11(1):28-33. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_311_19. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
3
Comparison of four cordless gingival displacement systems: A clinical study.四种无绳牙龈移位系统的比较：一项临床研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Feb;121(2):265-270. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
4
Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials in the Management of Gingival Sulcus Width: A Comparative Study.不同牙龈移位材料在控制牙龈沟宽度中的疗效：一项对比研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Jun 1;22(6):703-706.
5
Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Gingival Retraction using Polyvinyl Acetate Strips and Conventional Retraction Cord - An in Vivo Study.聚醋酸乙烯酯条与传统缩龈线用于牙龈退缩疗效的比较研究——一项体内研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Oct;7(10):2368-71. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6980.3526. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
6
Effect of gingival displacement cord and cordless systems on the closure, displacement, and inflammation of the gingival crevice.牙龈排龈线和无排龈线系统对龈沟封闭、移位及炎症的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Feb;115(2):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.023. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
7
Comparative evaluation of three noninvasive gingival displacement systems: An study.三种非侵入性牙龈移位系统的比较评估：一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 Apr-Jun;18(2):122-130. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_225_17.
8
Comparative clinical efficacy evaluation of three gingival displacement systems.三种牙龈退缩系统的临床疗效比较评估
J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015 Aug;6(Suppl 1):S53-7. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.166082.
9
A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Gingival Retraction Using Polyvinyl Siloxane Foam Retraction System, Vinyl Polysiloxane Paste Retraction System, and Copper Wire Reinforced Retraction Cord in Endodontically Treated Teeth: An Study.聚硅氧烷泡沫收缩系统、乙烯基聚硅氧烷糊剂收缩系统和铜丝增强收缩线在根管治疗牙齿中牙龈收缩效果的比较评估：一项研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2019 Jul-Sep;10(3):428-432. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_708_18.
10
Comparative evaluation of three gingival displacement materials for efficacy in tissue management and dimensional accuracy.三种牙龈退缩材料在组织管理和尺寸精度方面疗效的比较评估
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019 Apr-Jun;19(2):173-179. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_285_18.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Two Cordless Retraction Materials on Inflammatory Biomarkers Interleukin-1 Beta and Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha in Gingival Crevicular Fluid: An In-Vivo Study.两种无绳牵引材料对龈沟液中炎症生物标志物白细胞介素-1β和肿瘤坏死因子-α的影响：一项体内研究。
Cureus. 2025 Aug 6;17(8):e89464. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89464. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Comparative evaluation of gingival displacement and clinical efficacy using polyvinyl siloxane foam and retraction cord systems: A randomized controlled in vivo study.使用聚乙烯基硅氧烷泡沫和缩龈线系统对牙龈移位和临床疗效的比较评估：一项随机对照体内研究。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025 Sep-Oct;15(5):1103-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.07.016. Epub 2025 Jul 26.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of three noninvasive gingival displacement systems: An study.三种非侵入性牙龈移位系统的比较评估：一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 Apr-Jun;18(2):122-130. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_225_17.
2
Evaluation of a novel compule-based gingival retraction system in UK general dental practices.在英国普通牙科诊所对一种新型基于计算机的牙龈退缩系统的评估。
Dent Update. 2014 Jun;41(5):432-4, 437-8. doi: 10.12968/denu.2014.41.5.432.
3
Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Gingival Retraction using Polyvinyl Acetate Strips and Conventional Retraction Cord - An in Vivo Study.
Efficacy of hemostasis and gingival retraction of Merocel strip compared with conventional retraction cord utilizing digital gypsum model: a randomized controlled trial.
与传统缩龈线相比，使用数字石膏模型评估美洛赛条带的止血和牙龈退缩效果：一项随机对照试验
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 27;15(1):10508. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95612-8.
4
Intraoral Applications of Lasers in the Prosthetic Rehabilitation with Fixed Partial Dentures-A Narrative Review.激光在固定局部义齿修复中的口腔内应用——一项叙述性综述
Dent J (Basel). 2024 May 31;12(6):164. doi: 10.3390/dj12060164.
5
A Clinical Study of 50 Partially Edentulous Patients with Fixed Partial Denture Restorations to Compare Clinical Parameters and Changes in Gingival Sulcus Width After Displacement with 2 Different Gingival Retraction Cord Materials (Cotton and Polymer).50 名部分牙缺失患者的固定局部义齿修复的临床研究，比较 2 种不同牙龈收缩线材料（棉线和聚合物）移位后临床参数和龈沟宽度的变化。
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Apr 27;29:e940098. doi: 10.12659/MSM.940098.
聚醋酸乙烯酯条与传统缩龈线用于牙龈退缩疗效的比较研究——一项体内研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Oct;7(10):2368-71. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6980.3526. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
4
Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques.固定修复中制取印模时的牙龈退缩：现代原则、材料与技术
Dent Clin North Am. 2014 Jan;58(1):45-68. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2013.09.002.
5
A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques.当代印模材料与技术综述。
Dent Clin North Am. 2004 Apr;48(2):vi-vii, 445-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.014.
6
Current methods of finish-line exposure by practicing prosthodontists.口腔修复医生目前采用的终点暴露方法。
J Prosthodont. 1999 Sep;8(3):163-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.1999.tb00031.x.
7
The effect of displacement time on gingival crevice width.移位时间对龈沟宽度的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 1997 May-Jun;10(3):248-53.
8
The effect of marginal thickness on the distortion of different impression materials.边缘厚度对不同印模材料变形的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Nov;76(5):466-71. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90002-5.
9
Tissue management with a new gingival retraction material: a preliminary clinical report.使用新型牙龈退缩材料的组织管理：一份初步临床报告。
J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Mar;75(3):242-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90479-5.
10
Oral hygiene, periodontal conditions and carious lesions in patients treated with dental bridges. A 15-year clinical and radiographic follow-up study.牙桥修复患者的口腔卫生、牙周状况及龋损。一项为期15年的临床及影像学随访研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 1993 Aug;20(7):482-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1993.tb00395.x.