• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移位时间对龈沟宽度的影响。

The effect of displacement time on gingival crevice width.

作者信息

Baharav H, Laufer B Z, Langer Y, Cardash H S

机构信息

Section of Oral Rehabilitation, Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, University of Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 1997 May-Jun;10(3):248-53.

PMID:9484057
Abstract

The authors investigated the length of time medicated displacement cord should remain in the gingival crevice prior to impression making. A silk cord (Deknatel) was placed into the sulcus and was not removed during the study. Medicated cords (Hemodent on Ultrapak #1) were placed into the gingival sulcus for 2, 4, 6, and 8 minutes. Following cord removal, closure of the sulcus was recorded at intervals using a miniature video camera. Crevicular widths were measured at the midbuccal and transitional line angle areas. At both the midbuccal and transitional line angle areas, gingival crevices displaced for 2 minutes were significantly smaller at 20 seconds (P < .05) than crevices following displacement for 4, 6, and 8 minutes. No significant difference in crevicular width was found at any time period after cord removal for crevices displaced for 4, 6, and 8 minutes. At the transitional line angle, crevicular widths were significantly smaller than at the midbuccal at 20 seconds for all times and remained so up to 180 seconds. To achieve a crevicular width of 0.2 mm, cord should remain in the gingival crevice for an optimum time of 4 minutes prior to impression making when using the materials evaluated in this study.

摘要

作者们研究了在制取印模前,含药排龈线应保留在龈沟内的时间。将一根丝线(Deknatel)放入龈沟内,在研究过程中不取出。将含药排龈线(Ultrapak #1上的Hemodent)分别放入龈沟2、4、6和8分钟。取出排龈线后,使用微型摄像机每隔一段时间记录龈沟的闭合情况。在颊侧中点和移行线角区域测量龈沟宽度。在颊侧中点和移行线角区域,排龈2分钟的龈沟在20秒时明显比排龈4、6和8分钟后的龈沟小(P <.05)。对于排龈4、6和8分钟的龈沟,在取出排龈线后的任何时间段,龈沟宽度均未发现显著差异。在移行线角处,所有时间点20秒时的龈沟宽度均明显小于颊侧中点处,并且一直保持到180秒。当使用本研究中评估的材料时,为了获得0.2mm的龈沟宽度,在制取印模前,排龈线应在龈沟内保留4分钟的最佳时间。

相似文献

1
The effect of displacement time on gingival crevice width.移位时间对龈沟宽度的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 1997 May-Jun;10(3):248-53.
2
The closure of the gingival crevice following gingival retraction for impression making.
J Oral Rehabil. 1997 Sep;24(9):629-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00558.x.
3
Effect of gingival displacement cord and cordless systems on the closure, displacement, and inflammation of the gingival crevice.牙龈排龈线和无排龈线系统对龈沟封闭、移位及炎症的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Feb;115(2):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.023. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
4
Effects of pre-soaked retraction cords on the microcirculation of the human gingival margin.预浸缩龈线对人牙龈边缘微循环的影响。
Oper Dent. 2002 Jul-Aug;27(4):343-8.
5
Dose-related effects of epinephrine on human gingival blood flow and crevicular fluid production used as a soaking solution for chemo-mechanical tissue retraction.
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Jan;97(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.10.004.
6
[Three-dimensional model analysis of the gingival sulcus width from different retraction time].[不同缩龈时间龈沟宽度的三维模型分析]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2011 Feb 18;43(1):73-6.
7
Influence of different retraction techniques on crevicular fluid flow.不同牵张技术对龈沟液流动的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 2008 May-Jun;21(3):215-6.
8
In vitro kinetic study of absorbency of retraction cords.缩龈线吸收性的体外动力学研究
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Jan;89(1):45-9. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.61.
9
Using the double-cord packing technique of tissue retraction for making crown impressions.采用组织牵开的双丝线填充技术制取冠部印模。
Dent Today. 1999 Jan;18(1):54-9.
10
Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.用于评估弹性印模材料渗透特性的牙龈沟模拟模型
Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Jul-Aug;16(4):385-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of gingival displacement and clinical efficacy using polyvinyl siloxane foam and retraction cord systems: A randomized controlled in vivo study.使用聚乙烯基硅氧烷泡沫和缩龈线系统对牙龈移位和临床疗效的比较评估:一项随机对照体内研究。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025 Sep-Oct;15(5):1103-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.07.016. Epub 2025 Jul 26.
2
Efficacy of hemostasis and gingival retraction of Merocel strip compared with conventional retraction cord utilizing digital gypsum model: a randomized controlled trial.与传统缩龈线相比,使用数字石膏模型评估美洛赛条带的止血和牙龈退缩效果:一项随机对照试验
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 27;15(1):10508. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95612-8.
3
Comparative Evaluation of the Clinical Efficacy of Four Different Gingival Retraction Systems: An In Vivo Study.
四种不同牙龈退缩系统临床疗效的比较评估:一项体内研究
Cureus. 2022 Apr 7;14(4):e23923. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23923. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
The Influence of Hemostatic Agents and Cordless Gingival Retraction Materials on Smear Layer: An Ex vivo Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis.止血剂和无绳牙龈退缩材料对玷污层的影响:一项体外扫描电子显微镜分析
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2021 Jul-Sep;11(3):143-147. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_324_20. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
5
Influence of the Gingival Condition on the Performance of Different Gingival Displacement Methods-A Randomized Clinical Study.牙龈状况对不同牙龈排龈方法效果的影响——一项随机临床研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 22;10(13):2747. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132747.
6
Comparative evaluation of three gingival displacement materials for efficacy in tissue management and dimensional accuracy.三种牙龈退缩材料在组织管理和尺寸精度方面疗效的比较评估
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019 Apr-Jun;19(2):173-179. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_285_18.
7
Effect of the impression margin thickness on the linear accuracy of impression and stone dies: an in vitro study.印模边缘厚度对印模和石膏模型线性精度的影响:一项体外研究
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013 Mar;13(1):13-8. doi: 10.1007/s13191-012-0160-7. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
8
Assessment of crown and bridge work quality among Sudanese dental practitioners.苏丹牙科从业者牙冠与牙桥修复工作质量评估
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010 Mar;10(1):53-6. doi: 10.1007/s13191-010-0009-x. Epub 2010 Aug 5.