• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

活体肝移植供者的社会人口学特征:20 年来变化不大。

Sociodemographic characteristics of living liver donors: Few changes over 20 years.

机构信息

New York-Presbyterian Hospital Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York, NY, USA.

New York-Presbyterian Hospital Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2022 Jul;36(7):e14701. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14701. Epub 2022 May 20.

DOI:10.1111/ctr.14701
PMID:35532183
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although there are well-documented challenges in access to living donor liver transplant (LDLT) among recipients, it is unclear whether living liver donors (LLDs) face similar challenges.

METHODS

We analyzed the UNOS Standard Transplant Analysis and Research database, including LLDs ≥ 18 years in the United States from 1/1998 to 12/2018. We compared sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, race/ethnicity, education level, employment status, BMI, and relationship to recipient) of LLDs across three eras-pre-MELD (1998-2002), MELD (2003-2013), and post-direct acting antivirals (DAA) (2014-2018). We also described sociodemographic characteristics of living donor recipients and waitlisted patients. Chi-squared and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

From 1998 to 2018, 4756 LDLTs and 99 765 DDLTs were performed. Across the three eras, LLD age did not change significantly (P = .3), but donors were generally young (mean age 37 ± 11). While men comprised most LLDs in the pre-MELD era (55.2%), women surpassed them in the post-DAA era (52.9%), P < .001. In total, White donors comprised 81.5% of total LLDs, while Black and Asian donors were a small minority of total donors (3.7% and 2.5%, respectively). Most donors had at least a college education and were employed. Educational attainment and employment did not significantly change over the study period.

CONCLUSION

During the last 20 years, LLDs have remained White, employed, highly educated, and young with increasing numbers of women LLDs. The relative lack of change in the characteristics of donors is likely attributable largely to socioeconomic factors, which should be assessed in future investigation.

摘要

介绍

尽管受体接受活体供肝移植(LDLT)存在有据可查的困难,但尚不清楚活体肝供者(LLD)是否面临类似的挑战。

方法

我们分析了美国器官共享网络(UNOS)标准移植分析和研究数据库,包括 1998 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间年龄≥18 岁的美国 LLD。我们比较了三个时代(MELD 前时代[1998-2002 年]、MELD 时代[2003-2013 年]和直接作用抗病毒药物[DAA]后时代[2014-2018 年])中 LLD 的社会人口统计学特征(年龄、性别、种族/民族、教育程度、就业状况、BMI 和与受体的关系)。我们还描述了活体供体受体和等候名单患者的社会人口统计学特征。卡方检验和单因素方差分析(ANOVA)分别用于比较分类变量和连续变量。

结果

1998 年至 2018 年期间,共进行了 4756 例 LDLT 和 99765 例 DDLT。在三个时代中,LLD 年龄没有显著变化(P=0.3),但供者通常较年轻(平均年龄 37±11 岁)。虽然在 MELD 前时代,男性构成了大多数 LLD(55.2%),但在 DAA 后时代,女性超过了男性(52.9%),P<0.001。总的来说,白人供者占所有 LLD 的 81.5%,而黑人和亚洲供者是供者的少数群体(分别为 3.7%和 2.5%)。大多数供者至少具有大学学历并就业。受教育程度和就业状况在研究期间没有显著变化。

结论

在过去的 20 年中,LLD 一直保持白人、就业、高学历和年轻,女性 LLD 的数量不断增加。供者特征相对缺乏变化可能在很大程度上归因于社会经济因素,这应在未来的研究中进行评估。

相似文献

1
Sociodemographic characteristics of living liver donors: Few changes over 20 years.活体肝移植供者的社会人口学特征:20 年来变化不大。
Clin Transplant. 2022 Jul;36(7):e14701. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14701. Epub 2022 May 20.
2
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score does not predict patient or graft survival in living donor liver transplant recipients.终末期肝病模型评分不能预测活体肝移植受者的患者或移植物存活率。
Liver Transpl. 2003 Jul;9(7):737-40. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50122.
3
Long-term donor quality of life after living donor liver transplantation in Japan.日本活体肝移植后供者的长期生活质量。
Clin Transplant. 2019 Jun;33(6):e13584. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13584. Epub 2019 May 9.
4
Comparative analysis of hepatitis C recurrence and fibrosis progression between deceased-donor and living-donor liver transplantation: 8-year longitudinal follow-up.比较尸肝和活体肝移植后丙型肝炎复发和纤维化进展:8 年纵向随访。
Transplantation. 2011 Aug 27;92(4):453-60. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182259282.
5
Challenging the Traditional Paradigm of Supply and Demand in Pediatric Liver Transplantation Through Nondirected Living Donation: A Case Series.通过非定向活体捐赠挑战小儿肝移植中的供需传统模式:病例系列。
Liver Transpl. 2021 Oct;27(10):1392-1400. doi: 10.1002/lt.26108. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
6
Improved Graft Survival After Liver Transplantation for Recipients With Hepatitis C Virus in the Direct-Acting Antiviral Era.直接作用抗病毒药物时代肝移植治疗丙型肝炎病毒感染者的移植物存活率提高。
Liver Transpl. 2019 Apr;25(4):598-609. doi: 10.1002/lt.25424.
7
Living Donation Versus Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation for Low Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Recipients.活体捐赠与循环死亡后肝脏移植在低终末期肝病模型受体中的比较。
Liver Transpl. 2019 Apr;25(4):580-587. doi: 10.1002/lt.25073. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
8
UNOS Liver Registry: ten year survivals.器官共享联合网络肝脏登记处:十年生存率
Clin Transpl. 2006:29-39.
9
Trends and Health Care Outcomes Among Living Liver Donors: Are We Ready to Expand the Donor Pool With Living Liver Donations?活体肝移植供者的趋势和医疗保健结果:我们是否准备好通过活体肝移植扩大供者库?
Liver Transpl. 2021 Nov;27(11):1603-1612. doi: 10.1002/lt.26223. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
10
Liver transplantations with donors aged 60 years and above: the low liver damage strategy.
Transpl Int. 2009 Apr;22(4):423-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2008.00812.x. Epub 2008 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Financial toxicity in living donor liver transplantation: A call to action for financial neutrality.活体肝移植中的财务毒性:呼吁财务中立。
Am J Transplant. 2024 Oct;24(10):1742-1754. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.05.012. Epub 2024 May 18.