Suppr超能文献

药物治疗原发性头痛中的反安慰剂效应:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The Nocebo Response in Pharmacologic Treatments of Primary Headache: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.

出版信息

J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Oct;62(10):1257-1272. doi: 10.1002/jcph.2072. Epub 2022 Jun 1.

Abstract

The nature and magnitude of nocebo responses in primary headache disorders are still unknown. To assess the distribution and possible predictors of nocebo responses in primary headache treatments, databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched from 1988 to December 31, 2020, for parallel-group, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials of pharmacologic treatments of primary headaches. The nocebo responses were calculated using a random effects meta-analysis model. Subgroup and metaregression analyses were performed to determine the associations of study design and demographic characteristics with nocebo responses. A total of 178 randomized controlled trials that satisfied the inclusion criteria were included. Prophylactic treatments elicited stronger nocebo responses than acute treatments. The majority of nocebo adverse events were mild to moderate in severity, with the nervous and digestive systems being the most commonly affected. There was a strong correlation between the active medication and control groups in terms of adverse events, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Long treatment duration, a high proportion of subjects receiving active medications, multicenter design, North America, high body mass index, women, previous treatment experiences, and a high proportion of patients with migraine headache with aura were all found to be significant positive predictors of nocebo responses, whereas the year of publication was found to be inversely related to them. Nocebo effects should be noticed for their contribution to discontinuation of or lack of adherence to active treatments. Clarifying these nocebo-related risk factors can aid in their clinical prevention and management.

摘要

原发性头痛障碍中否塞反应的性质和程度尚不清楚。为了评估原发性头痛治疗中否塞反应的分布和可能的预测因素,从 1988 年到 2020 年 12 月 31 日,对包括 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 在内的数据库进行了平行组、双盲、随机安慰剂对照试验的药物治疗原发性头痛的搜索。否塞反应使用随机效应荟萃分析模型进行计算。进行了亚组和荟萃回归分析,以确定研究设计和人口统计学特征与否塞反应的关系。共有 178 项符合纳入标准的随机对照试验被纳入。预防性治疗比急性治疗引起更强的否塞反应。大多数否塞不良事件的严重程度为轻度至中度,以神经系统和消化系统最常受到影响。在不良事件方面,活性药物组和对照组在数量和质量上都有很强的相关性。治疗时间长、接受活性药物的受试者比例高、多中心设计、北美、高体重指数、女性、既往治疗经验以及偏头痛伴先兆的患者比例高,这些都是否塞反应的显著阳性预测因素,而出版年份则与之呈负相关。否塞效应应该因其对活性治疗的停药或不依从的贡献而受到关注。阐明这些与否塞相关的风险因素有助于对其进行临床预防和管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验