Suppr超能文献

注意功能和抑制控制在不同物质使用障碍中的作用。

Attentional function and inhibitory control in different substance use disorders.

机构信息

Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America.

Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2022 Jul;313:114591. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114591. Epub 2022 May 1.

Abstract

Attentional function in substance use disorder (SUD) is not well understood. To probe attentional function in SUD as a function of primary substance of abuse, we administered the attentional network task (ANT) to 44 individuals with Cocaine Use Disorder (CoUD), 49 individuals with Cannabis Use Disorder (CaUD), 86 individuals with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD), and 107 controls with no SUD, along with the stop-signal task (SST). The ANT quantifies the effects of (temporal) alerting cues and (spatial) orienting cues to reduce reaction time (RT) to targets, as well as probing how conflicting (target-incongruent) stimuli slow RT. The SST quantifies individuals' ability to inhibit already-initiated motor responses. After controlling for sex representation and age, OUD and CaUD participants showed blunted alerting effects compared to controls, whereas CaUD and CoUD participants showed greater stimulus conflict (flanker) effects. Finally, CoUD participants showed a trend toward increased orienting ability. In SST performance, no SUD group showed a prolonged stop-signal reaction compared to controls. However, the OUD group (and CoUD group at trend level) showed prolonged "go" RT to targets and reduced hit rates. These data indicate differences in attentional function in persons with SUD as a function of the primary substance use.

摘要

物质使用障碍(SUD)患者的注意力功能尚未得到充分理解。为了探究 SUD 患者的注意力功能是否与滥用的主要物质有关,我们对 44 名可卡因使用障碍(CoUD)患者、49 名大麻使用障碍(CaUD)患者、86 名阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者和 107 名无 SUD 的对照者进行了注意力网络测试(ANT)和停止信号任务(SST)。ANT 量化了(时间)警觉线索和(空间)定向线索对减少目标反应时间(RT)的影响,以及探究冲突(目标不一致)刺激如何减缓 RT。SST 量化了个体抑制已启动的运动反应的能力。在控制了性别表现和年龄后,OUD 和 CaUD 参与者的警觉效应较对照组减弱,而 CaUD 和 CoUD 参与者的刺激冲突(侧翼)效应更大。最后,CoUD 参与者表现出定向能力增强的趋势。在 SST 表现中,无 SUD 组与对照组相比,停止信号反应时间延长。然而,OUD 组(和 CoUD 组在趋势水平上)表现出目标的“go”RT 延长和击中率降低。这些数据表明,SUD 患者的注意力功能存在差异,这取决于主要的物质使用。

相似文献

5
Attentional network deficits in children with autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍儿童的注意力网络缺陷。
Dev Neurorehabil. 2016 Dec;19(6):389-397. doi: 10.3109/17518423.2015.1017663. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

3
Opioid Use and Driving Performance.阿片类药物的使用与驾驶表现。
J Med Toxicol. 2021 Jul;17(3):289-308. doi: 10.1007/s13181-020-00819-y. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
5
One Is Not Enough: Understanding and Modeling Polysubstance Use.一种并不够:理解和建模多物质使用。
Front Neurosci. 2020 Jun 16;14:569. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00569. eCollection 2020.
10
Dissociated deficits in attentional networks in social anxiety and depression.社交焦虑和抑郁中注意力网络的分离缺陷。
Sci China Life Sci. 2020 Jul;63(7):1071-1078. doi: 10.1007/s11427-019-1624-5. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验