• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗左侧胰腺导管腺癌可能降低局部复发率。

Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy for Left-Sided Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma May Reduce the Local Recurrence Rate.

作者信息

Kiritani Sho, Kaneko Junichi, Arita Junichi, Ishizawa Takeaki, Akamatsu Nobuhisa, Hasegawa Kiyoshi

机构信息

Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Dig Surg. 2022;39(4):191-200. doi: 10.1159/000524927. Epub 2022 May 9.

DOI:10.1159/000524927
PMID:35533649
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although several clinical applications have reported the usefulness of the radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) procedure for left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, few studies have reported the advantages of RAMPS with respect to the local recurrence (LR) rate.

METHODS

As of 2018, 68 and 62 patients underwent RAMPS and standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SRPS). The first recurrence and all subsequent recurrence sites observed on images during a follow-up period and/or chemotherapy. The clinical variables are collected retrospectively.

RESULTS

LR only was found in 5 patients in the RAMPS group (5/68, 7.3%) and in 15 patients in the SRPS group (15/62, 24.2%; p = 0.008) as the first recurrence site. Any chemotherapies were not a risk factor for the incidence of LR. The 5-year cumulative LR rate was significantly lower in patients in the RAMPS group compared with those in the SRPS group (23.6% vs. 49.6%; p = 0.019). The 5-year overall survival was 42.2% in the RAMPS group and 33.0% in the SRPS group (p = 0.251).

CONCLUSION

The RAMPS procedure for left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma may reduce the LR, cumulative LR rates.

摘要

引言

尽管多项临床应用报告了根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)治疗胰体尾导管腺癌的有效性,但很少有研究报道RAMPS在局部复发(LR)率方面的优势。

方法

截至2018年,68例和62例患者分别接受了RAMPS和标准逆行胰脾切除术(SRPS)。在随访期间和/或化疗期间通过影像学观察首次复发及所有后续复发部位。回顾性收集临床变量。

结果

作为首次复发部位,RAMPS组有5例患者仅出现局部复发(5/68,7.3%),SRPS组有15例患者出现局部复发(15/62,24.2%;p = 0.008)。任何化疗均不是局部复发发生率的危险因素。与SRPS组患者相比,RAMPS组患者的5年累积局部复发率显著更低(23.6%对49.6%;p = 0.019)。RAMPS组的5年总生存率为42.2%,SRPS组为33.0%(p = 0.251)。

结论

用于治疗胰体尾导管腺癌的RAMPS手术可能会降低局部复发及累积局部复发率。

相似文献

1
Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy for Left-Sided Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma May Reduce the Local Recurrence Rate.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗左侧胰腺导管腺癌可能降低局部复发率。
Dig Surg. 2022;39(4):191-200. doi: 10.1159/000524927. Epub 2022 May 9.
2
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Standard Retrograde Pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS) for Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与标准逆行胰脾切除术(SPRS)治疗左侧胰腺癌的手术结果比较
World J Surg. 2016 Sep;40(9):2267-75. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3526-x.
3
Standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy versus radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for body and tail pancreatic adenocarcinoma.标准逆行胰脾切除术与根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗胰体尾腺癌的比较
Am Surg. 2013 Nov;79(11):1154-8.
4
Robotic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SRPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与标准逆行胰脾切除术(SRPS)的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Apr 3;21(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04250-0.
5
Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus conventional distal pancreatosplenectomy (CDPS) for left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与传统胰体尾切除术(CDPS)治疗左侧胰导管腺癌的比较。
Surg Today. 2021 Jul;51(7):1126-1134. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02203-3. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
6
Comparison of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy with Standard Retrograde Pancreatosplenectomy for Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Experience of a Single Center.左半侧胰腺癌行根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术与标准逆行胰脾切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析及单中心经验。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Jun 21;25:4590-4601. doi: 10.12659/MSM.914540.
7
Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SRPS) for resectable body and tail pancreatic adenocarcinoma: protocol of a multicenter, prospective, randomized phase III control trial (CSPAC-3).根治性顺行模块化胰体尾切除术(RAMPS)与标准逆行胰体尾切除术(SRPS)治疗可切除胰体尾腺癌的多中心前瞻性随机 III 期对照临床试验(CSPAC-3)方案。
Trials. 2023 Aug 17;24(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07456-0.
8
A LASSO Cox Regression Predictive Model for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Pancreatic Body and Tail Adenocarcinoma Patients: Comparative Long-Term Survival Analysis of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Standard Retrograde Pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS).用于接受胰体尾腺癌手术患者的 LASSO Cox 回归预测模型:根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术 (RAMPS) 和标准逆行胰脾切除术 (SPRS) 的比较长期生存分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Nov;31(12):8317-8326. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15939-w. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
9
Initial experience with laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer in a single institution: technical aspects and oncological outcomes.单机构开展腹腔镜根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗左侧胰腺癌的初步经验:技术要点与肿瘤学结局
BMC Surg. 2017 Jan 7;17(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0200-z.
10
Surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.腹腔镜与开腹根治性顺行模块胰脾切除术治疗胰导管腺癌的手术和肿瘤学结果。
Surg Today. 2022 Feb;52(2):224-230. doi: 10.1007/s00595-021-02326-1. Epub 2021 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Distal pancreatectomy with or without radical approach, vascular resections and splenectomy: Easier does not always mean easy.采用或不采用根治性术式的远端胰腺切除术、血管切除术和脾切除术:操作简单并不总是意味着容易。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jun 27;15(6):1020-1032. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i6.1020.
2
Pancreaticoduodenectomy: how to handle a replaced right hepatic artery.胰十二指肠切除术:如何处理替代的右肝动脉。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2023 Apr 10;12(2):280-283. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-117. Epub 2023 Mar 27.