• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性顺行模块化胰体尾切除术(RAMPS)与标准逆行胰体尾切除术(SRPS)治疗可切除胰体尾腺癌的多中心前瞻性随机 III 期对照临床试验(CSPAC-3)方案。

Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SRPS) for resectable body and tail pancreatic adenocarcinoma: protocol of a multicenter, prospective, randomized phase III control trial (CSPAC-3).

机构信息

Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.

Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.

出版信息

Trials. 2023 Aug 17;24(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07456-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-023-07456-0
PMID:37592267
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10436627/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive malignancy. Radical surgical resection offers the only potential cure. There is increasing agreement that radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) may benefit patients with tumors in the body and tail of the pancreas. To address this, the Chinese Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (CSPAC)-3 trial is proposed to compare the effect of RAMPS and standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SRPS) on patient survival and preoperative safety METHODS: The randomized controlled trial will be multicenter and two-armed with blinded outcomes and intention-to-treat analysis. Three hundred patients with resectable body and tail pancreatic adenocarcinoma will be enrolled and randomly assigned to RAMPS or SRPS. Adjuvant chemotherapy based on an initial regimen will be recommended 4-6 weeks after surgery if no serious complication occurs. The hypothesis that RAMPS improves survival outcomes compared with SRPS will be tested using a superiority trial. The primary outcome will be overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes will include recurrence-free survival (RFS), R0 resection rate, the number of harvested lymph nodes, postoperative complications, and quality of life scores.

DISCUSSION

The use of RAMPS has increased over the past decade. It is reported that RAMPS is superior to SRPS in improving both the rate of R0 resection and lymph node yield. Despite these advantages, however, there is little high-level documentation of the superiority of RAMPS in terms of survival and this needs to be investigated. To address this issue, CSPAC has instigated the first prospective, randomized phase III control trials, aiming to explore the optimal surgical strategy for improving the prognosis and OS of patients with left-sided pancreatic cancer Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100053844; pre-results. Registered on December 1, 2021.

摘要

背景

胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)是一种高度侵袭性的恶性肿瘤。根治性手术切除是唯一可能治愈的方法。越来越多的人认为,根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)可能有益于胰腺体尾部肿瘤患者。为此,提出了中国胰腺癌研究组(CSPAC)-3 试验,旨在比较 RAMPS 和标准逆行胰脾切除术(SRPS)对患者生存和术前安全性的影响。

方法

这项随机对照试验将是多中心的、双臂的、结局盲法和意向治疗分析。将招募 300 名可切除的胰腺体尾部腺癌患者,并随机分为 RAMPS 或 SRPS 组。如果没有严重并发症,术后 4-6 周将根据初始方案推荐辅助化疗。采用优效性试验检验 RAMPS 改善生存结局的假设。主要结局是总生存(OS)。次要结局包括无复发生存(RFS)、R0 切除率、采集的淋巴结数量、术后并发症和生活质量评分。

讨论

过去十年中,RAMPS 的应用有所增加。据报道,RAMPS 在提高 R0 切除率和淋巴结检出率方面优于 SRPS。然而,尽管有这些优势,但关于 RAMPS 在生存方面的优越性的高水平文献却很少,这需要进行研究。为了解决这个问题,CSPAC 发起了第一项前瞻性、随机 III 期对照临床试验,旨在探索改善左侧胰腺癌患者预后和 OS 的最佳手术策略。

试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心 ChiCTR2100053844;预注册于 2021 年 12 月 1 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4d1/10436627/d18e0e87eb21/13063_2023_7456_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4d1/10436627/d18e0e87eb21/13063_2023_7456_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4d1/10436627/d18e0e87eb21/13063_2023_7456_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SRPS) for resectable body and tail pancreatic adenocarcinoma: protocol of a multicenter, prospective, randomized phase III control trial (CSPAC-3).根治性顺行模块化胰体尾切除术(RAMPS)与标准逆行胰体尾切除术(SRPS)治疗可切除胰体尾腺癌的多中心前瞻性随机 III 期对照临床试验(CSPAC-3)方案。
Trials. 2023 Aug 17;24(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07456-0.
2
Robotic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SRPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与标准逆行胰脾切除术(SRPS)的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Apr 3;21(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04250-0.
3
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Standard Retrograde Pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS) for Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与标准逆行胰脾切除术(SPRS)治疗左侧胰腺癌的手术结果比较
World J Surg. 2016 Sep;40(9):2267-75. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3526-x.
4
Standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy versus radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for body and tail pancreatic adenocarcinoma.标准逆行胰脾切除术与根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗胰体尾腺癌的比较
Am Surg. 2013 Nov;79(11):1154-8.
5
Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus conventional distal pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: findings of a multicenter, retrospective, propensity score matching study.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与传统胰体尾切除术治疗左侧胰腺癌的比较:一项多中心回顾性倾向评分匹配研究的结果。
Surg Today. 2021 Nov;51(11):1775-1786. doi: 10.1007/s00595-021-02280-y. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
6
Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy for Left-Sided Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma May Reduce the Local Recurrence Rate.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗左侧胰腺导管腺癌可能降低局部复发率。
Dig Surg. 2022;39(4):191-200. doi: 10.1159/000524927. Epub 2022 May 9.
7
Comparison of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy with Standard Retrograde Pancreatosplenectomy for Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Experience of a Single Center.左半侧胰腺癌行根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术与标准逆行胰脾切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析及单中心经验。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Jun 21;25:4590-4601. doi: 10.12659/MSM.914540.
8
A LASSO Cox Regression Predictive Model for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Pancreatic Body and Tail Adenocarcinoma Patients: Comparative Long-Term Survival Analysis of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Standard Retrograde Pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS).用于接受胰体尾腺癌手术患者的 LASSO Cox 回归预测模型:根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术 (RAMPS) 和标准逆行胰脾切除术 (SPRS) 的比较长期生存分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Nov;31(12):8317-8326. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15939-w. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
9
ISOlation Procedure vs. conventional procedure during Distal Pancreatectomy (ISOP-DP trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.ISOlation Procedure vs. conventional procedure during Distal Pancreatectomy (ISOP-DP trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Trials. 2021 Sep 16;22(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05523-y.
10
Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus conventional distal pancreatosplenectomy (CDPS) for left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与传统胰体尾切除术(CDPS)治疗左侧胰导管腺癌的比较。
Surg Today. 2021 Jul;51(7):1126-1134. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02203-3. Epub 2021 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Value of a ≥ 1000 μm Posterior Margin After Gerota's Fascia Resection in Distal Pancreatectomy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.在可切除胰腺癌的胰体尾切除术中,肾筋膜切除术后后缘≥1000μm的预后价值:一项单中心回顾性研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18173-0.
2
The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection for Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Updates, Trends, and Future Considerations.里程碑系列:导管腺癌的微创胰腺切除术、进展、趋势及未来考量
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun 7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17483-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer Statistics, 2021.癌症统计数据,2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
2
Assessement of postoperative long-term survival quality and complications associated with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.顺行性模块化胰脾切除术和远端胰腺切除术相关的术后长期生存质量及并发症评估:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
BMC Surg. 2019 Jan 28;19(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0476-x.
3
R0 Versus R1 Resection Matters after Pancreaticoduodenectomy, and Less after Distal or Total Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer.
胰十二指肠切除术(PD)后,R0 与 R1 切除的结果有差异,而对于胰腺癌行胰远端或全胰切除术时,这种差异较小。
Ann Surg. 2018 Dec;268(6):1058-1068. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002345.
4
Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy versus standard procedure in the treatment of left-sided pancreatic cancer: A systemic review and meta-analysis.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术与标准手术治疗左侧胰腺癌的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Surg. 2017 Jun 5;17(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0259-1.
5
Role of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Pancreatic Cancer.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与胰腺癌的关系。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jan;25(1):46-50. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5675-4. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
6
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Standard Retrograde Pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS) for Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer.根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)与标准逆行胰脾切除术(SPRS)治疗左侧胰腺癌的手术结果比较
World J Surg. 2016 Sep;40(9):2267-75. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3526-x.
7
Comparison of standard distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy.标准远端胰腺切除术和脾切除术与根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术的比较。
Am Surg. 2014 Mar;80(3):295-300.
8
Role of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas.根治性顺行模块化胰体尾切除术治疗胰体尾部腺癌。
World J Surg. 2014 Jan;38(1):186-93. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2254-8.
9
Standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy versus radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for body and tail pancreatic adenocarcinoma.标准逆行胰脾切除术与根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗胰体尾腺癌的比较
Am Surg. 2013 Nov;79(11):1154-8.
10
Improved survival of left-sided pancreas cancer after surgery.左侧胰腺癌手术后生存率提高。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun;40(6):530-6. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyq015. Epub 2010 Apr 2.