• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并发心原性休克的急性心肌梗死中 Impella 装置的置入时机:一项更新的荟萃分析。

Timing of impella placement in PCI for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: An updated meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, ASL Città di Torino, Turin, Italy.

Division of Cardiology, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, ASL Città di Torino, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2022 Sep 1;362:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.05.011. Epub 2022 May 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.05.011
PMID:35533755
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The timing of hemodynamic support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) has yet to be defined. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the impact of timing of Impella initiation on early and midterm mortality.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane databases. All studies reporting short-term mortality rates and timing of Impella placement in AMICS were included. Meta-regression analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed on the primary endpoint, short-term mortality (≤30 days), and secondary endpoints (midterm mortality, device-related bleeding, and limb ischemia).

RESULTS

Of 1289 studies identified, 13 studies (6810 patients; 2970 patients identified as receiving Impella pre-PCI and 3840 patients receiving Impella during/post-PCI) were included in this analysis. Median age was 63.8 years (IQR 63-65.7); 76% of patients were male, and a high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors was noted across the entire population. Short-term mortality was significantly reduced in those receiving pre-PCI vs. during/post-PCI Impella support (37.2% vs 53.6%, RR 0.7; CI 0.56-0.88). Midterm mortality was also lower in the pre-PCI Impella group (47.9% vs 73%, RR 0.81; CI 0.68-0.97). The rate of device-related bleeding (RR 1.05; CI 0.47-2.33) and limb ischemia (RR 1.6; CI 0.63-2.15) were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This analysis suggests that Impella placement prior to PCI in AMICS may have a positive impact on short- and midterm mortality compared with post-PCI, with similar safety outcomes. Due to the observational nature of the included studies, further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis (CRD42022300372).

摘要

引言

急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克(AMI-CS)患者的血流动力学支持时机尚未确定。本荟萃分析旨在评估 Impella 启动时机对早期和中期死亡率的影响。

方法

通过 PubMed 和 Cochrane 数据库进行系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。纳入所有报告 AMI-CS 短期死亡率和 Impella 放置时机的研究。对主要终点(30 天内死亡率)和次要终点(中期死亡率、器械相关出血和肢体缺血)进行荟萃回归分析和敏感性分析。

结果

在 1289 项研究中,有 13 项研究(6810 例患者;2970 例患者被确定为接受 PCI 前的 Impella,3840 例患者在 PCI 期间/后接受 Impella)被纳入本分析。中位年龄为 63.8 岁(IQR 63-65.7);76%的患者为男性,整个人群均存在较高的心血管危险因素。与接受 PCI 期间/后 Impella 支持的患者相比,接受 PCI 前 Impella 支持的患者短期死亡率显著降低(37.2%比 53.6%,RR 0.7;95%CI 0.56-0.88)。PCI 前 Impella 组的中期死亡率也较低(47.9%比 73%,RR 0.81;95%CI 0.68-0.97)。两组器械相关出血(RR 1.05;95%CI 0.47-2.33)和肢体缺血(RR 1.6;95%CI 0.63-2.15)的发生率相似。

结论

与 PCI 后相比,AMI-CS 患者在 PCI 前放置 Impella 可能对短期和中期死亡率产生积极影响,且安全性结局相似。由于纳入研究的观察性质,需要进一步研究来证实这一假设(CRD42022300372)。

相似文献

1
Timing of impella placement in PCI for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: An updated meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并发心原性休克的急性心肌梗死中 Impella 装置的置入时机:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Sep 1;362:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.05.011. Epub 2022 May 6.
2
Left Ventricular Unloading Before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention is Associated With Improved Survival in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前左心室卸载与伴心原性休克的急性心肌梗死患者生存率的改善相关:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jun;39:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.10.012. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
3
Long term survival after early unloading with Impella CP in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者应用 Impella CP 早期撤机后的长期生存。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Mar;9(2):149-157. doi: 10.1177/2048872618815063. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
4
Impella Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Meta-Analysis.经皮左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊反搏在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克中的应用比较:一项荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jan;34:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.01.028. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
5
Early Impella Support in Postcardiac Arrest Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Improves Short- and Long-Term Survival.早期经皮 Impella 辅助治疗急性心肌梗死后并发心原性休克伴心脏骤停可改善短期和长期生存率。
Crit Care Med. 2021 Jun 1;49(6):943-955. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004915.
6
Impella 2.5 initiated prior to unprotected left main PCI in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock improves early survival.在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者进行无保护左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)之前启动Impella 2.5可提高早期生存率。
J Interv Cardiol. 2017 Jun;30(3):256-263. doi: 10.1111/joic.12377. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
7
Impella in cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性心肌梗死后心原性休克患者应用 Impella:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2020 Dec;132(23-24):716-725. doi: 10.1007/s00508-020-01712-y. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
8
Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者使用机械循环支持的当代趋势。
Open Heart. 2020 Mar 4;7(1):e001214. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001214. eCollection 2020.
9
Timing of Impella implantation and outcomes in cardiogenic shock or high-risk percutaneous coronary revascularization.在心原性休克或高危经皮冠状动脉血运重建中 Impella 植入的时机和结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Aug 1;98(2):E222-E234. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29674. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
10
Structured Weaning From the Impella Left Ventricular Micro-Axial Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock and Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Experience From a Non-Cardiac Surgical Centre.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗保护下急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克应用 Impella 左心室微轴流泵撤机的结构优化:非心脏外科中心的经验。
Heart Lung Circ. 2024 Apr;33(4):460-469. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.12.007. Epub 2024 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Priorities for Early Revascularization or Introduction of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.急性冠状动脉综合征合并心源性休克患者早期血运重建或引入机械循环支持的优先事项——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Circ Rep. 2025 Jul 23;7(9):715-726. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0098. eCollection 2025 Sep 10.
2
SCAI/EAPCI/ACVC Expert Consensus Statement on Cardiogenic Shock in Women: This statement was endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA).美国心脏协会(HFSA)认可的关于女性心源性休克的SCAI/EAPCI/ACVC专家共识声明。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 May 20;4(6):102150. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102150. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Timing of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in patients with cardiogenic shock.心源性休克患者静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合支持的时机
Eur J Heart Fail. 2025 Jan;27(1):40-50. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3498. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
4
Contemporary optimal therapeutic strategy with escalation/de-escalation of temporary mechanical circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock and advanced heart failure in Japan.日本心源性休克和晚期心力衰竭患者临时机械循环支持的升级/降级当代最佳治疗策略
J Artif Organs. 2025 Jun;28(2):103-109. doi: 10.1007/s10047-024-01471-x. Epub 2024 Sep 8.
5
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock: Current Studies and Future Directions.急性心肌梗死所致心源性休克中的机械循环支持装置:当前研究与未来方向
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Mar 27;2(2):100586. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100586. eCollection 2023 Mar-Apr.
6
Cardiogenic Shock a Quarter Century Later: A Dire Outcome Barely Changed.25年后的心源性休克:严峻结局几乎未变。
JACC Adv. 2023 May 26;2(3):100357. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100357. eCollection 2023 May.
7
Protected high risk percutaneous coronary intervention-Impella 5.0 as a single-access technique: a case report.受保护的高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗——使用Impella 5.0作为单通路技术:一例病例报告。
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2024 Jan 30;8(2):ytae060. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytae060. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
Timing of Initiation of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support and Outcomes Among Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.心源性休克患者体外膜肺氧合支持启动时机与预后
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 6;13(3):e032288. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032288. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
9
From medical therapy to mechanical support: strategies for device selection and implantation techniques.从药物治疗到机械支持:设备选择策略与植入技术
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2023 Dec 13;25(Suppl I):I11-I18. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad128. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
Timing and treatment strategies according to SCAI classification in cardiogenic shock.心源性休克中根据SCAI分类的时机和治疗策略
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2023 Dec 13;25(Suppl I):I19-I23. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad129. eCollection 2023 Dec.