Meraj Perwaiz M, Doshi Rajkumar, Schreiber Theodore, Maini Brijeshwar, O'Neill William W
Department of Cardiology, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York.
Department of Cardiology, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan.
J Interv Cardiol. 2017 Jun;30(3):256-263. doi: 10.1111/joic.12377. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
To assess post-procedural outcomes when Impella 2.5 percutaneous left ventricular assist device (pLVAD) support is initiated either prior to or after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) culprit lesion in the context of acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock (AMICS).
Initiation of Impella 2.5 pLVAD prior to PCI is associated with significant survival benefit in the setting of AMICS. Outcomes of those presenting with a ULMCA culprit lesion in this setting have not been well characterized.
Thirty-six consecutive patients in the cVAD Registry supported with Impella 2.5 pLVAD for AMICS who underwent PCI on ULMCA culprit lesion were included in our multicenter study.
The average age was 69.8 ± 14.2 years, 77.8% were male, 72.7% were in CS at admission, 44.4% sustained one or multiple cardiac arrests, and 30.6% had anoxic brain injury. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the Pre-PCI group (n = 20) and Post-PCI group (n = 16). Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and greater coronary disease burden were significantly more frequent in the Pre-PCI group but they had significantly better survival to discharge (55.0% vs 18.8%, P = 0.041). Kaplan-Meier 30-day survival analysis showed very poor survival in Post-PCI group (48.1% vs 12.5%, Log-Rank P = 0.004).
Initiation of Impella 2.5 pLVAD prior to as compared with after PCI of ULMCA for AMICS culprit lesion is associated with significant early survival. As previously described, patients supported after PCI appear to have very poor survival at 30 days.
评估在急性心肌梗死心源性休克(AMICS)背景下,对无保护左主干冠状动脉(ULMCA)罪犯病变进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)之前或之后启动Impella 2.5经皮左心室辅助装置(pLVAD)支持后的术后结果。
在AMICS情况下,PCI之前启动Impella 2.5 pLVAD与显著的生存获益相关。在这种情况下,出现ULMCA罪犯病变患者的结果尚未得到充分描述。
我们的多中心研究纳入了连续36例在cVAD登记处接受Impella 2.5 pLVAD支持治疗AMICS且对ULMCA罪犯病变进行PCI的患者。
平均年龄为69.8±14.2岁,77.8%为男性,72.7%入院时处于心源性休克状态,44.4%发生过一次或多次心脏骤停,30.6%有缺氧性脑损伤。PCI前组(n = 20)和PCI后组(n = 16)的基线特征具有可比性。非ST段抬高型心肌梗死和更严重的冠状动脉疾病负担在PCI前组中明显更常见,但他们出院生存率显著更高(55.0%对18.8%,P = 0.041)。Kaplan-Meier 30天生存分析显示PCI后组生存率极低(48.1%对12.5%,对数秩检验P = 0.004)。
对于AMICS罪犯病变的ULMCA,与PCI后启动Impella 2.5 pLVAD相比,PCI前启动与显著的早期生存相关。如前所述,PCI后接受支持的患者在30天时生存率似乎极低。