• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗保护下急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克应用 Impella 左心室微轴流泵撤机的结构优化:非心脏外科中心的经验。

Structured Weaning From the Impella Left Ventricular Micro-Axial Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock and Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Experience From a Non-Cardiac Surgical Centre.

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit Department, Western Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.

Department of Cardiology, Western Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.

出版信息

Heart Lung Circ. 2024 Apr;33(4):460-469. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.12.007. Epub 2024 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2023.12.007
PMID:38388259
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) temporary percutaneous left ventricular assist device is increasingly used as mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock (AMICS) or those undergoing high-risk protected percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The optimal weaning regimen remains to be defined.

METHOD

We implemented a structured weaning protocol in a series of 10 consecutive patients receiving Impella support for protected PCI or AMICS treated with PCI in a high volume non-cardiac surgery centre. Weaning after revascularisation was titrated to native heart recovery using both haemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters.

RESULTS

Ten patients (eight male, two female; aged 43-70 years) received Impella support for AMICS (80%) or protected PCI (20%). Cardiogenic shock was of Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions grade C-E of severity in 80%, and median left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was 31 mmHg. Protocol implementation allowed successful weaning in eight of 10 patients with a median support time of 29 hours (range, 4-48 hours). Explantation was associated with an increase in heart rate (81 vs 88 bpm; p=0.005), but no significant change in Cardiac Index (2.9 vs 2.9 L/min/m), mean arterial pressure (79 vs 82 mmHg), vasopressor requirement (10% vs 10%), or serum lactate (1.0 vs 1.0). Median durations of intensive care and hospital stay were 3 and 6 days, respectively. At 30 days, the mortality rate was 20%, with median left ventricular ejection fraction of 40%.

CONCLUSIONS

A structured and dynamic weaning protocol for patients with AMICS and protected PCI supported by the Impella device is feasible in a non-cardiac surgery centre. Larger studies are needed to assess generalisability of such a weaning protocol.

摘要

背景

Impella(Abiomed,马萨诸塞州丹弗斯)临时经皮左心室辅助装置越来越多地用于急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克(AMICS)或接受高危保护经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者的机械循环支持。最佳撤机方案仍有待确定。

方法

我们在一家高容量非心脏手术中心对接受 Impella 支持的接受保护 PCI 或 AMICS 治疗的 10 例连续患者实施了一项结构化撤机方案。使用血流动力学和超声心动图参数对再血管化后的心脏恢复情况进行滴定以达到撤机。

结果

10 例患者(8 例男性,2 例女性;年龄 43-70 岁)因 AMICS(80%)或保护 PCI(20%)接受 Impella 支持。心原性休克的严重程度为心血管造影与介入学会(Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions)分级 C-E 级的患者占 80%,左心室舒张末期压中位数为 31mmHg。该方案的实施使 10 例患者中的 8 例成功撤机,中位支持时间为 29 小时(范围 4-48 小时)。撤机时,心率从 81 增加到 88 bpm(p=0.005),但心指数(2.9 升/分钟/米)、平均动脉压(79 毫米汞柱)、血管加压素需求(10%)或血清乳酸(1.0)没有明显变化。重症监护和住院时间中位数分别为 3 天和 6 天。30 天时死亡率为 20%,左心室射血分数中位数为 40%。

结论

Impella 装置支持的 AMICS 和保护 PCI 患者的结构化和动态撤机方案在非心脏手术中心是可行的。需要更大规模的研究来评估这种撤机方案的普遍性。

相似文献

1
Structured Weaning From the Impella Left Ventricular Micro-Axial Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock and Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Experience From a Non-Cardiac Surgical Centre.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗保护下急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克应用 Impella 左心室微轴流泵撤机的结构优化:非心脏外科中心的经验。
Heart Lung Circ. 2024 Apr;33(4):460-469. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.12.007. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
2
Long term survival after early unloading with Impella CP in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者应用 Impella CP 早期撤机后的长期生存。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Mar;9(2):149-157. doi: 10.1177/2048872618815063. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
3
Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者使用机械循环支持的当代趋势。
Open Heart. 2020 Mar 4;7(1):e001214. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001214. eCollection 2020.
4
Early Impella Support in Postcardiac Arrest Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Improves Short- and Long-Term Survival.早期经皮 Impella 辅助治疗急性心肌梗死后并发心原性休克伴心脏骤停可改善短期和长期生存率。
Crit Care Med. 2021 Jun 1;49(6):943-955. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004915.
5
Impella 2.5 initiated prior to unprotected left main PCI in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock improves early survival.在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者进行无保护左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)之前启动Impella 2.5可提高早期生存率。
J Interv Cardiol. 2017 Jun;30(3):256-263. doi: 10.1111/joic.12377. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
6
Clinical outcomes among cardiogenic shock patients supported with high-capacity Impella axial flow pumps: A report from the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group.高容量 Impella 轴流泵支持下心源性休克患者的临床结局:心源性休克工作组的报告。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Sep;43(9):1478-1488. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.05.015. Epub 2024 Jun 2.
7
Real-life use of left ventricular circulatory support with Impella in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: 12 years AMC experience.经皮左心室辅助装置在急性心肌梗死后心源性休克中的应用:12 年 AMC 经验。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Jun;8(4):338-349. doi: 10.1177/2048872618805486. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
8
Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并发心源性休克患者使用经皮左心室辅助装置的性别差异:来自经皮心室辅助装置工作组
Indian Heart J. 2018 Jul;70 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S90-S95. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
9
Outcomes of Hemodynamic Support With Impella for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock at a Rural Community Hospital Without On-Site Surgical Back-up.在一家没有现场手术支持的农村社区医院,使用Impella进行血流动力学支持治疗急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克的结果。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Feb;31(2):E23-E29. doi: 10.25270/jic/18.00252.
10
Mechanical circulatory support versus vasopressors alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.机械循环支持与单独使用血管加压素在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者中的比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan;103(1):30-41. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30913. Epub 2023 Nov 23.