• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜可调节胃束带仍然是一种安全、有效且持久的手术减肥选择。

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band remains a safe, effective, and durable option for surgical weight loss.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery and Bariatric Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7781-7788. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09278-8. Epub 2022 May 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-022-09278-8
PMID:35534734
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite many patients doing well after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) several studies caution offering this procedure for weight loss. The aim of our study was to review our long-term results over a decade.

METHODS

Following IRB approval, the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Data Registry was used to identify LAGB placement between 2007 and 2013 by a single surgeon. We sought to determine complications of initial operation, weight loss and resolution of comorbidities over time, the indications for reoperation including removal, revision or conversion to another weight loss surgery. Chi-square test was used to analysis.

RESULTS

From 403 LAGB performed between January 2007 and December 2013, 75 patients required reoperation with total 79 procedures, including band revision and/or conversion. Mean follow-up time was 5.78 years (73.67 months). The rate of reoperation was at least 18.61%. There were 60 band removals, 10 band revisions, 9 conversions to either sleeve or gastric bypass. Only 16 patients (20.25%) required reoperation due to inadequate weight loss. Band slippage/prolapse remained the most common non weight-related indication for reoperation (23, 29.11%). Reoperation associated with longer length of stay compared to index procedures (2.12 days vs 1.63 days, p < 0.0001) but no statistical difference in 30_days_complication. Of those who did not require reoperation, BMI at 10th year follow-up was 37.50 from initial BMI of 42.23 with EWL of 39.22%.

CONCLUSIONS

Lap band is effective for most patients with long-term durability. Over time approximately one fifth will need additional surgery. Only one fifth of reoperation relates to inadequate weight loss.

摘要

背景

尽管许多患者在腹腔镜可调节胃带(LAGB)手术后恢复良好,但仍有几项研究对该手术用于减肥持谨慎态度。我们研究的目的是回顾过去十年的长期结果。

方法

在获得机构审查委员会批准后,使用代谢和减重手术质量改进计划(MBSAQIP)数据登记处,由一位外科医生确定在 2007 年至 2013 年间进行 LAGB 放置。我们试图确定初始手术的并发症、随时间推移的体重减轻和合并症的解决情况,以及再次手术的指征,包括带的移除、修改或转换为另一种减肥手术。采用卡方检验进行分析。

结果

在 2007 年 1 月至 2013 年 12 月期间,共有 403 例 LAGB 患者,其中 75 例患者需要再次手术,共进行了 79 例手术,包括带的修改和/或转换。平均随访时间为 5.78 年(73.67 个月)。再次手术的比例至少为 18.61%。有 60 例带的移除,10 例带的修改,9 例转换为袖套或胃旁路。仅有 16 例(20.25%)因体重减轻不足需要再次手术。带的滑脱/脱垂仍然是最常见的非体重相关再次手术指征(23 例,29.11%)。与初次手术相比,再次手术的住院时间更长(2.12 天 vs 1.63 天,p < 0.0001),但 30 天并发症无统计学差异。在不需要再次手术的患者中,第 10 年随访时的 BMI 为初始 BMI 的 37.50,而 EWL 为 39.22%。

结论

腹腔镜胃带对大多数患者长期有效。随着时间的推移,大约五分之一的患者需要进行额外的手术。只有五分之一的再次手术与体重减轻不足有关。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band remains a safe, effective, and durable option for surgical weight loss.腹腔镜可调节胃束带仍然是一种安全、有效且持久的手术减肥选择。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7781-7788. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09278-8. Epub 2022 May 9.
2
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band removal and outcome of subsequent revisional bariatric procedures: A retrospective review of 214 consecutive patients.腹腔镜可调节胃束带移除术及后续减重手术修正的结果:对214例连续患者的回顾性研究
Int J Surg. 2016 Mar;27:133-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.068. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
3
Revisional weight loss surgery after failed laparoscopic gastric banding: an institutional experience.腹腔镜胃束带术失败后的减重修正手术:机构经验
Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4087-93. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3065-6. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
4
Surgery for weight loss in adults.成人减肥手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 8;2014(8):CD003641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub4.
5
Revisional Gastric Bypass for Failed Restrictive Procedures: Comparison of Single-Anastomosis (Mini-) and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.针对限制性手术失败的翻修性胃旁路手术:单吻合口(迷你)胃旁路手术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术的比较
Obes Surg. 2018 Apr;28(4):970-975. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2991-0.
6
Revision Procedures After Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding: Comparison of Efficacy and Safety.可调节胃束带术失败后的修复手术:疗效与安全性比较
Obes Surg. 2017 Nov;27(11):2861-2867. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2716-4.
7
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after successful weight loss with a laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: rationales and early outcomes in patients of body mass index<35 kg/m(2.).腹腔镜可调节胃束带减肥成功后行Roux-en-Y胃旁路术:体重指数<35kg/m²患者的理论依据及早期结果
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
8
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy as Revisional Procedures after Adjustable Gastric Band: 5-Year Outcomes.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术作为可调节胃束带术后修正手术的5年结果
Obes Surg. 2017 Jun;27(6):1430-1437. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2502-8.
9
An update on 73 US obese pediatric patients treated with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: comorbidity resolution and compliance data.73例接受腹腔镜可调节胃束带术治疗的美国肥胖儿科患者的最新情况:合并症缓解及依从性数据
J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Jan;43(1):141-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.09.035.
10
Gastric band conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass shows greater weight loss than conversion to sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year outcomes.胃束带转换为 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术比转换为袖状胃切除术能获得更大的减重效果:5 年随访结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Oct;14(10):1531-1536. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Gastric banding adjustment catheter dislodgement and perforation into the colon: case report.胃束带调整导管移位并穿孔进入结肠:病例报告
AME Case Rep. 2025 Jun 19;9:78. doi: 10.21037/acr-24-240. eCollection 2025.
2
Revisional One-Step Bariatric Surgical Techniques After Unsuccessful Laparoscopic Gastric Band: A Retrospective Cohort Study with 2-Year Follow-up.腹腔镜胃带术失败后再次减重手术的一步法:一项具有 2 年随访的回顾性队列研究。
Obes Surg. 2024 Mar;34(3):814-829. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-07039-7. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
3
Management of abdominal wall hernias in patients with severe obesity.
严重肥胖患者腹壁疝的处理。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):6619-6626. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10312-6. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
4
How Good is Stratification and Prediction Model Analysis Between Primary and Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery? A Multi-center Study and Narrative Review.初次与再次 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术之间的分层和预测模型分析效果如何?一项多中心研究和叙述性综述。
Obes Surg. 2023 May;33(5):1431-1448. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06532-3. Epub 2023 Mar 11.