Suppr超能文献

蔓越莓补充剂、D-甘露糖及其他非处方疗法用于预防电灼术后女性复发性尿路感染

Cranberry Supplement, D-Mannose, and Other OTC Modalities for Prevention of Recurrent UTI in Women Post-Electrofulguration.

作者信息

Kenee Parker R M, Christie Alana L, Zimmern Philippe E

机构信息

Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75290-9110, USA.

Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center Biostatistics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390-8852, USA.

出版信息

Int J Womens Health. 2022 May 3;14:643-653. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S355469. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess patient reliance on various over-the-counter (OTC) modalities used for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection (RUTI) after electrofulguration (EF).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Following IRB approval, qualifying women were offered a short survey over the phone by a medical researcher to collect information about their use of various OTC modalities for prophylaxis of RUTI. Data was compared between two cohorts, ≥70 years old and <70 years old, using chi-squared and Student's -tests.

RESULTS

From a database of 324 patients, 163 accepted the interview. 17% (28/163) reported current use of cranberry supplements, 10% (16/163) D-mannose supplements, and 42% (69/163) another non-prescription modality for RUTI prophylaxis. The non-geriatric (<70 years old) cohort spent, on average, $80 less annually on cranberry/D-mannose supplements (=0.043) than the geriatric cohort and were more likely to use non-prescription modalities for the prevention of UTI (52% vs 30%; =0.0061). Individuals using D-mannose were also much more likely to purchase their product online compared to those using cranberry supplements (85% vs 56%). Across all modalities, the perceived benefit difference in reducing UTI/year ranged from a median of 0 for Pyridium® (phenazopyridine hydrochloride) to four for probiotics, with D-mannose and cranberry at two/year, and those increasing daily fluid consumption at 2.5 fewer UTI/year.

CONCLUSION

Continued use of non-prescription modalities for RUTI prophylaxis were common among women with an EF history, but varied based on age groups. Across both age cohorts, annual expenditure and perceived benefit also varied among different OTC prophylactic modalities. Awareness of type and method of OTC modality implementation by patients with RUTI is essential to aligning use with current field recommendations.

摘要

目的

评估患者对电灼术后用于预防复发性尿路感染(RUTI)的各种非处方(OTC)方法的依赖程度。

患者与方法

经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准后,医学研究人员通过电话向符合条件的女性提供一份简短调查问卷,以收集她们使用各种OTC方法预防RUTI的信息。使用卡方检验和学生t检验对≥70岁和<70岁这两个队列的数据进行比较。

结果

在324例患者的数据库中,163例接受了访谈。17%(28/163)报告目前正在使用蔓越莓补充剂,10%(16/163)使用D-甘露糖补充剂,42%(69/163)使用另一种非处方方法预防RUTI。非老年(<70岁)队列每年在蔓越莓/D-甘露糖补充剂上的花费平均比老年队列少80美元(P=0.043),并且更有可能使用非处方方法预防尿路感染(52%对30%;P=0.0061)。与使用蔓越莓补充剂的人相比,使用D-甘露糖的人也更有可能在网上购买产品(85%对56%)。在所有方法中,每年减少尿路感染的感知益处差异范围从中位值0(对于盐酸非那吡啶)到4(对于益生菌),D-甘露糖和蔓越莓为每年2次,而增加每日液体摄入量可使每年尿路感染减少2.5次。

结论

有电灼病史的女性中继续使用非处方方法预防RUTI很常见,但因年龄组而异。在两个年龄队列中,不同OTC预防方法的年度支出和感知益处也有所不同。RUTI患者对OTC方法的类型和实施方法的了解对于使使用情况与当前领域建议保持一致至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验